Theme: Civilization

  • “In the last couple of centuries clever people’s designs for reinventing human c

    –“In the last couple of centuries clever people’s designs for reinventing human civilization have tended to end pretty badly, especially when they’ve been imposed from above.”– Matt Ridley @mattwridley

    The evidence is that the slow, continuous, incremental correction of falsehood, suppresion of irreciprocity, and scientific innovation solve what no radical policy solves – radical policy is the impulsivity of an ignorant child with high time preferences unable to resist eating the marshmallow while the test administrator leaves the room.

    Reply addressees: @DavidGHFrost @mattwridley


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-07 12:42:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688531137956646912

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688305530874306560

  • (IMO Nietzsche’s criticisms are correct, his primary insight in his first book i

    (IMO Nietzsche’s criticisms are correct, his primary insight in his first book is the need for our western restoration. But few people understand him thoroughly because they’re looking for what isn’t there. Nietzche didn’t solve the problem he set out to. He didn’t. He couldn’t. He could only tell us what it might feel like if we did. I would argue we are still trying to complete the 19th-century Darwinian revolution and the classical restoration, but the Marxists have been selling snake oil precisely because all the past thinkers never succeeded sufficiently to counter them.
    Now, IMO (and I don’t know anyone who understands this better than I do) the information was sitting under our noses – it just wasn’t in philosophical or theological form, and unfortunately, there is a deep need for supernatural or ideal sentiments that justify emotions rather than explain the solutions rationally.
    I’m more worried about ending the Marxist-to-woke cult than anything else. Because it’s what’s prohibiting our restoration = because our restoration requires responsibility and the entire leftist corpus is a promise of irresponsibility and freedom from the laws of nature – which of course, is not only false, but suicidal. No more dark ages please.)

    Reply addressees: @CCrowley100 @QuixoteSword


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-06 00:00:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687977030413844481

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687599004538777600

  • RT @bronzeagemantis: If kids in first image had been reading Homer, admiring anc

    RT @bronzeagemantis: If kids in first image had been reading Homer, admiring ancient Grek fountain of life, Nietzsche, Mishima, military tr…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-05 23:54:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687975388352335872

  • “The west has to go through a right of passage”— @LukeWeinhagen

    —“The west has to go through a right of passage”— @LukeWeinhagen


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-05 18:16:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687890246300471296

  • RT @ArcologyTech: A built environment is a product of a peoples’ genetics, much

    RT @ArcologyTech: A built environment is a product of a peoples’ genetics, much like a crustacean’s shell – and will ill-fit another geneti…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-05 18:14:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687889845702512641

  • (worth repeating) The Americans like the European colonial powers, like the roma

    (worth repeating)

    The Americans like the European colonial powers, like the romans, and like the greeks, before them, have ‘rediscovered’ that we cannot ‘domesticate’ other civilizations, because they cannot cooperate on equal footing. And if we cannot cooperate on equal footing it is in the interest of less evolved civilizations to conflict. As such civilizations and the races they serve (civilization = race) cannot comingle politically, only economically by trade, and strategically by alliances.

    (from an earlier post)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-05 14:47:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687837619290275840

  • Dutch and English are the closest of the west germanic languages. This is why it

    Dutch and English are the closest of the west germanic languages. This is why it’s almost as difficult to tell the difference between some dutch and english genes as it is northern french and english genes. Dutch and English culture are similar in that it’s the pairing of the Dutch and English merchants across the channel-north sea that created the financial and commercial revolutions.

    Additionally 93-95% of the Dutch population speaks English, so their tempo and intonation remains dutch. (and their education system is better than ours).

    That said you’re likely detecting a flatter response.

    So, yes, there are notable differences in speech rhythm between English and Dutch speakers. These differences can be attributed to several factors, including the structure of the languages, the placement of stress in words and sentences, and the use of intonation.

    1. Syllable-timing vs. Stress-timing: Languages are often categorized as being syllable-timed or stress-timed. In syllable-timed languages, syllables tend to take up roughly equal amounts of time, whereas in stress-timed languages, the time between stressed syllables tends to be equal, making unstressed syllables shorter. Dutch is often classified as more syllable-timed, while English is typically considered stress-timed. However, this is a simplification, and the rhythm of a language can fall on a continuum between these two categories.

    2. Stress Placement: English has variable stress, meaning that stress can fall on any syllable in a word, and this stress is crucial for understanding. Dutch, on the other hand, has more fixed stress patterns, typically on the first syllable of a word, and stress plays a less significant role in distinguishing word meanings.

    3. Intonation: English and Dutch also differ in their use of intonation, or the melody of speech. English often uses a wider pitch range and more varied intonation patterns, while Dutch intonation might seem flatter to an English speaker’s ear.

    4. Vowel Reduction: English frequently uses reduced, or “schwa,” vowels in unstressed syllables, contributing to its characteristic rhythm. Dutch also uses schwa vowels, but not as frequently as English.

    These differences can affect the perceived rhythm when speakers of these languages talk. However, individual speaking styles, regional accents, and other factors can also influence speech rhythm.

    Sources:

    Goedemans, R., & van Zanten, E. (2007). Stress and accent in Indonesian. In V. J. van Heuven & E. van Zanten (Eds.), Prosody in Indonesian languages (pp. 35-62). LOT.
    Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 515-546). Mouton de Gruyter.

    Reply addressees: @antigg860413


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-05 14:45:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687837243140866048

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687833136510431233

  • That is why your ancestors failed to produce dominion over nature and her laws a

    That is why your ancestors failed to produce dominion over nature and her laws and europeans did. “Faustian Spirit” We are not the victims of the gods, men, beasts and nature, but competitors seeking to displace them.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-04 14:02:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687463959488552960

    Reply addressees: @SameeraKhan @hbdchick

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687261215226032129

  • RT @Scientific_Bird: New study on the (self-)selection of Spanish migrants in co

    RT @Scientific_Bird: New study on the (self-)selection of Spanish migrants in colonial Americas

    “the findings show that Spaniards who left…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-04 13:56:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687462514303365120

  • Theoretically, given the current state of human evolution, we would want a popul

    Theoretically, given the current state of human evolution, we would want a population with an average IQ of 115. The British were very close to this before the industrial revolution, and the ashkenazim, once integrated were just under it (though it might be overstated a bit, I’m… https://t.co/8LJq8AlkIA


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-03 21:32:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687214839817535489

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687204415244222464