Theme: Civilization

TRUTH AND FEMALE MYSTICISM

(very controversial)

TRUTH BY CULTURE

German Protestant : Martial Duty. Truth and Duty are inseparable.

English Catholic (Episcopalian) : Aristocratic Paternalism. Testimonial Truth.

Italian Catholic : Utilitarian Paternalism. Objective Truth, Pragmatic action.

French Catholic : Authoritarian Paternalism. Pragmatism as Truth.

European Jews : Authoritarian Separatism. Results, not truth. (Truth unknowable)

Finns and Estonians (lutherans) : Pagans using christian rituals.

I don’t feel ready to express any confidence in the eastern european concept of truth because as most Russians have said, it is almost impossible for westerners to understand the depth of Russian nihilism. As far as I can tell, eastern europeans practice demonstrable truth, and non-demonstrable mysticism, although their mysticism can be expressed as the opposite of western optimism: a deep presumption that the universe conspires to cheat or oppress them somehow, and that the truth is hidden from them by the universe, and they must defend against both man and the universe.

ON WOMEN, PRE-SCIENTIFIC AND PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC MYSTICISM

Women are easier to diagnose than men, since, for example, in the west, we have all the “crazy-chicks” that are into light therapy, pop psychology, postmodern sociology, horoscopes, feminism as an aspirational social model, yoga as religion, and reactionary religions in themselves. ***Western women have, at every single class level, and every single level of education, replaced traditional mysticism with pseudoscientific mysticism.*** The cosmopolitans have sold women every possible means of fulfilling their mystical desires.

Here in the east, women are still very likely to resort to pre-scientific mysticism. They believe in magic, spells, taboos, superstitions, talismans, gods and demons, female intuition as extra sensory perception, and ‘the order of the universe’ as anthropocentric. Although we do see a creeping expansion of female pseudoscientific mysticism in the culture, as pre-scientific mysticism no longer seems to fulfill their needs, and the various female cults of buddhism, yoga in particular, and other emotionally loaded forms of mysticism evolve in response to increases in formal education. But there is no sign here or in the west that women have abandoned mysticism, even if it is formalized as a pseudoscience in the extreme of academic feminism.

Women have been traditionally considered the root of evil. And given their impact on devolution of the aristocratic society, back to socialist and premodern forms, and their fascination by and expansion of pseudoscientific mysticism as a replacement for traditional mysticism, it is becoming statistically irrefutable that there is truth to this ancient caution.

The root is quite obvious however. Female reproduction and intuition evolved for the self and her genes, while male reproduction and intuition evolved for the tribe and advancing the tribe. For women, peace means that they can select preferred mates, but they select mates poorly for regressive (aggressive and impulsive) traits whenever possible (sorry ladies, I just go with the data). Males on the other hand want to band together as brothers to create a tribe, that can compete with other tribes of men.

For this reason women are politically and genetically destructive. The evidence is that under democracy women have sought to, and succeeded in, destroying their own civilization, mostly by their support of pseudoscientific mysticism as the new religion, and attacking traditional religion so that the could replace it with new pseudoscientific religion. That is why the other civilizations are rebelling against expansion of cultural suicide. They adopt central banking, fiat money, consumer capitalism, but not democracy. Because under democracy the lowest common denominator is expressed in law, and therefore in culture.

For this reason male dominated cultures will always conquer female dominated cultures. Because if males submit to female political preferences, the more aggressive males have, and always will, propagate. Which is in contrast to evolution that has shown us that the most advanced civilizations suppress impulsivity and aggression at the genetic level.

POLITICAL SOLUTIONS

I am not recommending that women be disenfranchised, only that we acknowledge that male and female votes are not of equal weight, or of similar interest. As such, just as we have had the monarchy, the aristocracy (the great families), the business class (the good families), and the church (the peasantry) as separate ‘houses’ of government, representing competing interests, we should also separate the male and female vote, representing competing interests. Competing interests with houses of government allow those houses to conduct exchanges rather than under a monopoly, conduct thefts (“takings”).

I promote compatibilism through voluntary exchange (cooperation). This promotes truth telling. Democracy requires that we lie (conquest). And the evidence is that all we do is lie under democracy. And anyone who tries will have a very hard time refuting this argument.

Curt Doolittle

The Philosophy of Aristocracy

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine