Theme: Civilization

  • Any religion not compatible with natural law is not in fact a religion, but a po

    Any religion not compatible with natural law is not in fact a religion, but a political competitor at war with western civilization.

    You can possess no right to freedom of religion if the premise of your religion is other than natural law – since no such rights are possible.

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 11:37:00 UTC

  • The Corrected History Of Civilization: Paternalism as Domestication

    (by Eli Harman) [A]dvanced civilization, with production and division of labor, is necessarily founded on property, which is a masculine innovation, the more private, the more masculine. Property is that which you obtain and maintain at personal cost, and that which you are willing and able to defend. Property rights are a subset of that property that your peers are willing to ensure, just as law is a subset of morality. Males evolved to specialize in the production of violence which sustains all property claims (and supply even the violence necessary to sustain communal forms of property in pre-civilized, matriarchal, societies.) Patriarchy and private property originate in bands of men organized for aggressive conquest, and the subsequent necessity of dividing the spoils of conquest (land, goods, and women) between them, organizing them for production, and defending them henceforth. Once unleashed on the world, patriarchal civilization proved unstoppable. And its advantages, in productivity, including but not limited to the production of violence, have only snowballed over time with the accumulation of capital and eugenic reproduction (made possible by restraining females’ dysgenic, egalitarian, tendencies.) Recent innovations to the contrary, which are really just regressive throwbacks to the paleolithic, were only made possible because one patriarchal society, Western civilization, attained such a commanding lead over adversaries and antagonists, that our forefathers thought they could afford to indulge their women without limit. And for a while, we could. But the madness has gone exponential, and a century and a half of unchecked consumption and decay wrought by faulty egalitarian premises have brought our enemies, once more, near enough to parity that they may begin punishing us for our folly. We will learn. Or we will die. But things will not continue as they were. Eli Harman.

  • The Corrected History Of Civilization: Paternalism as Domestication

    (by Eli Harman) [A]dvanced civilization, with production and division of labor, is necessarily founded on property, which is a masculine innovation, the more private, the more masculine. Property is that which you obtain and maintain at personal cost, and that which you are willing and able to defend. Property rights are a subset of that property that your peers are willing to ensure, just as law is a subset of morality. Males evolved to specialize in the production of violence which sustains all property claims (and supply even the violence necessary to sustain communal forms of property in pre-civilized, matriarchal, societies.) Patriarchy and private property originate in bands of men organized for aggressive conquest, and the subsequent necessity of dividing the spoils of conquest (land, goods, and women) between them, organizing them for production, and defending them henceforth. Once unleashed on the world, patriarchal civilization proved unstoppable. And its advantages, in productivity, including but not limited to the production of violence, have only snowballed over time with the accumulation of capital and eugenic reproduction (made possible by restraining females’ dysgenic, egalitarian, tendencies.) Recent innovations to the contrary, which are really just regressive throwbacks to the paleolithic, were only made possible because one patriarchal society, Western civilization, attained such a commanding lead over adversaries and antagonists, that our forefathers thought they could afford to indulge their women without limit. And for a while, we could. But the madness has gone exponential, and a century and a half of unchecked consumption and decay wrought by faulty egalitarian premises have brought our enemies, once more, near enough to parity that they may begin punishing us for our folly. We will learn. Or we will die. But things will not continue as they were. Eli Harman.

  • We spent thousands of years domesticating the human animal. Not oppressing him.

    We spent thousands of years domesticating the human animal. Not oppressing him. Domesticating him. Truth hurts.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 18:52:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711264053461700608

    Reply addressees: @JeBroo5 @JonHaidt @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711262581835620353


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JeBroo5

    @curtdoolittle @JonHaidt @sapinker not that I think Hobbes was necessarily wrong. Pinker made a compelling case for Hobbes in Better Angels

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711262581835620353

  • Every enlightenment culture sought to cast its group evolutionary strategy as a

    Every enlightenment culture sought to cast its group evolutionary strategy as a universal theory of man.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 18:21:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711256350953742336

    Reply addressees: @JeBroo5 @JonHaidt @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711243673003028481


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JeBroo5

    @curtdoolittle @JonHaidt @sapinker then comes Hobbes and the Leviathan to the “rescue”…

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711243673003028481

  • WE ARE THE NEW RIGHT Your ‘movement’ fantasies that you could expand the Anglo e

    WE ARE THE NEW RIGHT

    Your ‘movement’ fantasies that you could expand the Anglo enlightenment ideology of an aristocracy of everyone to the rest of the world as if a new Christian religion, or the Jewish enlightenment ideology of a universal market of satisfied consumers seduced by hyper consumption – have failed.

    The world does not want meritocracy because it cannot compete, and if parasitism is available it is permanently preferable to merit. Each wants its own evolutionary strategy to persist as much as we want ours to persist. Each want’s ascent as we did, not parity. Each seeks defeat not equality.

    Every fantasy of each enlightenment has proven a failure: the Anglo, the French, the German, the Jewish, the Russian, the Hindu and the Chinese. Every fantasy of each that still has yet to come will do the same.

    Why? Because demographics and norms limit the institutions and norms of any polity. Upon truthful introspection, both the Anglo imperial aristocracy of everyone and the Jewish merchant and finance free-rider strategies were attempts to preserve group evolutionary strategies using group advantages of the prior era and to promote them as universal strategies.

    But they were both dependent upon one advantage: the northern european “Hanseatic civilization’s” scientific, technological, military, cultural, mathematical, financial advantages – combined with their most precious advantage: the culling of the underclasses and the reduction of losses from their behavior.

    The Chinese, Japanese, and Northern Europeans were successful in the use of eugenic policy to eliminate the costly impulsives from their populations. Your experiment in self aggrandizement has reversed every one of our advantages, and done millennia of harm to our people in the process.

    So you are evicted. We will compose the history of your era as a great pseudoscience for the purpose of self aggrandizement. A folly upon which the wealth of the west was expended.

    And we will damn you as Nero’s for all eternity.

    If you are lucky you will die in your beds rather than at the end of a noose, beheaded by a guillotine, impaled upon a pole, or burned.

    But we will have no mercy upon your legacy.

    WE ARE THE NEW RIGHT. WE ARE LEGION. AND WE ARE COMING. AND WE WILL PUNISH THE WICKED – WITH ENTHUSIASM.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 08:49:00 UTC

  • WE ARE THE NEW RIGHT. Universalism, corporatism, individualism and financialism

    WE ARE THE NEW RIGHT. Universalism, corporatism, individualism and financialism dies with your generation. Familialism+nationalism returns.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 06:16:00 UTC

  • What Is The History Of Bellevue, Wa?

    1. Coal mines, lumber, swamps. scandinavians.
    2. War era manufacturing on the lakes.
    3. Bridge = cheap land, ‘the sticks’. suburbia. very white.
    4. Tech boom (Microsoft), ‘ bizarre economy’, extreme wealth.
    5. Best city to live in in america because no viable underclass, highly educated upper middle class. too expensive for lower classes to move in. no underclass means of employment.
    6. Microsoft people are extremely dysfunctional because of the corporate culture and it leads to very strange social order that permeates the region.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-history-of-Bellevue-WA

  • What Is The History Of Bellevue, Wa?

    1. Coal mines, lumber, swamps. scandinavians.
    2. War era manufacturing on the lakes.
    3. Bridge = cheap land, ‘the sticks’. suburbia. very white.
    4. Tech boom (Microsoft), ‘ bizarre economy’, extreme wealth.
    5. Best city to live in in america because no viable underclass, highly educated upper middle class. too expensive for lower classes to move in. no underclass means of employment.
    6. Microsoft people are extremely dysfunctional because of the corporate culture and it leads to very strange social order that permeates the region.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-history-of-Bellevue-WA

  • That is the one and only reason. We must face the truth of our history. And come

    That is the one and only reason. We must face the truth of our history. And come to terms with it. Or we have no future.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-17 09:58:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710404917668745216

    Reply addressees: @DemsRRealRacist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709961829116735488


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JBurtonXP

    I can cite no more conclusive proof of Trump being a liberal than that my colleagues and I seem completely powerless to thwart his agenda.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709961829116735488