Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • They destroyed America mostly in my lifetime. Sure, they destroyed our potential

    They destroyed America mostly in my lifetime. Sure, they destroyed our potential future as another Europe in the Civil War. Sure, they destroyed our eugenic strategy with the federal reserve, income tax, and FDR. Sure they destroyed our constitution through revisionism. But they destroyed our families in the 1960’s. Feminism, the Great Society attempt at copying the Soviets, the destruction of the black family through urban migration, common property and child support, and worse of all, the immigration act. All of which were programs designed to accomplish through soviet-style relocation that which the socialists could not achieve through persuasion.

    We need to prosecute them, punish them and collect restitution from them.

    And since we can trace the arguments through publications, we have a record that we can prosecute those who still live, and take property from their descendants.

    If we can restore property seized by the Nazis by force, why cannot we restore property stolen by the socialists by fraud?

    We have all the evidence we need. The perpetrators largely still live. The consequences of their fraud can be repaired through restitution and prosecution.

    So we merely need a to prosecute, punish, and repossess, right?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 05:22:00 UTC

  • The Aristocracy Must Own and Maintain a Park – in the ancient sense. A grove. 😉

    The Aristocracy Must Own and Maintain a Park – in the ancient sense. A grove.

    😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 04:01:00 UTC

  • “I REMEMBER WHEN WE PLANTED OAKS NOT ORNAMENTALS” That is the answer right there

    “I REMEMBER WHEN WE PLANTED OAKS NOT ORNAMENTALS”

    That is the answer right there.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 03:59:00 UTC

  • Sorry, but I have to say this again: being surrounded by Ukrainian families: chi

    Sorry, but I have to say this again: being surrounded by Ukrainian families: children, and mothers, is … fulfilling. It’s a living art gallery. Its all of europe. And sure I live in the educated classes. But the men are still men (not feminized wimps) and the women are women (not men). And the children are gorgeous and perfectly behaved in public. It’s such a joy.

    I remember you know. I remember when women couldn’t even go to the bar and order. I remember when the family was sacred. I remember when the commons was sacred. I remember when we planted oaks not ornamentals.

    I REMEMBER WHEN WE PLANTED OAKS NOT ORNAMENTALS

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 03:51:00 UTC

  • UKRAINE MAY BE A FAILED STATE BUT NOT A FAILED PEOPLE You can’t fix south americ

    UKRAINE MAY BE A FAILED STATE BUT NOT A FAILED PEOPLE

    You can’t fix south america. you can’t fix the Arab world. These are failed peoples. They are failed peoples because they are so asymmetrically bottom weighted that it is not possible to construct formal institutions that produce a voluntary organization of production – there are too many dead weights. The only solution to governing bottom weighted populations, is rule of law, brutal, ruthless, fearsome suppression of corruption, and a total inability of the peasantry to gain access to political rents or subsidies.

    Democracy is a luxury good for the distribution of proceeds from a highly productive people who have themselves suppressed parasitism at all levels of society.

    Democracy is a reward for good behavior that was created by rule of law and careful breeding.

    But democracy in the absence of good behavior created by rule of law and careful breeding, is merely permission to engage in bad behavior, lack of rule of law, and careless breeding.

    There is nothing wrong with ukraine that young politicians, bureaucrats, and judges wouldn’t fix.

    But the solution is not democracy. It is rule of law and a constant propaganda drum of how to do the right thing, and turn in people doing the wrong thing.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 14:53:00 UTC

  • Islam was designed to provide a social structure for the intellectually limited

    Islam was designed to provide a social structure for the intellectually limited in a low trust civilization that could not be controlled by any other means thatn strict rules of observation – which is why the muslims always failed.

    They were little better than the mongols.

    The mongols had no writing ad could not produce a bureaucracy because of low trust.

    The Arabs had writing but could not produce a bureaucracy because of low trust.

    Religion is the most ‘base’ of social orders.

    Law the next

    Credit the next

    Truth the greatest.

    But it is only in retrospect this is obvious.

    #islam

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 05:57:00 UTC

  • If we are conquered by the barbarians yet again, and it is achieved through the

    If we are conquered by the barbarians yet again, and it is achieved through the folly of our women, then what will we learn from this lesson?

    Our vanity.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 03:52:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) Being conquered by accounting, rule of law, guns germs and stee

    (from elsewhere)

    Being conquered by accounting, rule of law, guns germs and steel is something that must be learned from.

    I suppose you make the same statement about being conquered by the Indo-iranians, the Greeks, the mongols, and the muslims, right? In the past century, why did Indians import the thinking of the French and the Russians rather than the british and amerians?

    The question is, what did your people do wrong, such that they failed to invent such things and prevent conquest by so many others?

    Why have you failed for so much of history?

    You see, when you criticize the british, who certainly were parasitic, we see a long series of Indian failures to create sovereignty, for thousands of years.

    And when you criticize the British most, we think of Mao’s statement “If india had been a french colony, gandhi never would have been an old man.” The british could not abide by the immorality of their occupation, despite the profits. Who else has done that?

    What is troublesome is not that the British occupied the indian continent with so few men. But that the indian continent has always be conquered by others with superior technology using so few men.

    Why do Indians always fail?

    When you answer this question you will looking the mirror and question yourself, not that of others.

    All men are fools. Conquerors and Conquered alike.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 03:50:00 UTC

  • Long distance trade has always been present in europe. Long distance travel. Aga

    Long distance trade has always been present in europe. Long distance travel. Again. Did the Celts create a pax celtica prior to the pax romana?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 12:05:00 UTC

  • I suspect one of the reasons western women have had such great liberty and choic

    I suspect one of the reasons western women have had such great liberty and choice of mates is because there were no competing tribes as there were in the fertile crescent, desert and steppe.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 12:04:00 UTC