Theme: Civilization

  • China was far behind because of it’s hostility to innovation. And has intentiona

    China was far behind because of it’s hostility to innovation. And has intentionally adopted western tech/institutions.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 07:56:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721608161199788032

    Reply addressees: @Vitex_DR

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721607608721809408


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721607608721809408

  • In both the ancient and modern world, europeans dragged mankind out of ignorance

    In both the ancient and modern world, europeans dragged mankind out of ignorance and poverty – kicking and screaming.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 07:55:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721607932736090112

    Reply addressees: @Vitex_DR

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721602238913728515


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Simpsonito9999

    @curtdoolittle do you remember how whites lived in 1500? And How arabs lived in 1500? The first were the “barbarians”

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721602238913728515

  • The brits built stonehenge before the pyramids. And without the fertile crescent

    The brits built stonehenge before the pyramids. And without the fertile crescent’s productivity and labor.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 07:54:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721607711654338560

    Reply addressees: @Vitex_DR

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721602238913728515


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Simpsonito9999

    @curtdoolittle do you remember how whites lived in 1500? And How arabs lived in 1500? The first were the “barbarians”

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721602238913728515

  • If one conquers the oldest civilizations, and drives them into poverty and ignor

    If one conquers the oldest civilizations, and drives them into poverty and ignorance, that is the test of barbarism.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 07:53:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721607502522097664

    Reply addressees: @Vitex_DR

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721602238913728515


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Simpsonito9999

    @curtdoolittle do you remember how whites lived in 1500? And How arabs lived in 1500? The first were the “barbarians”

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721602238913728515

  • How did the Britons live in 1500, 1000, 0, -1500, -3500?. What was the velocity

    How did the Britons live in 1500, 1000, 0, -1500, -3500?. What was the velocity of each? Why Muslim Failure post conquest?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 07:51:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721607067526672384

    Reply addressees: @Vitex_DR

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721602938494300160


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Simpsonito9999

    @curtdoolittle How live the celts in 1800?and how was the Great City of Mesopotamia ? In fact Ireland was poorer than Mexico till 1980

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721602938494300160

  • So the way to restore the west is the organized application of violence to suppr

    So the way to restore the west is the organized application of violence to suppress the natural parasitism of women and parasitic classes.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 05:12:00 UTC

  • We lost our civilization by trying to signal to women and avoid the high cost of

    We lost our civilization by trying to signal to women and avoid the high cost of using violence to impose morality and liberty. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 05:08:00 UTC

  • In London or Seattle you can borrow an iPhone charger from anyone sitting around

    In London or Seattle you can borrow an iPhone charger from anyone sitting around you in a coffee shop.

    In Ukraine you can borrow a Samsung charger but not an iPhone charger.

    iPhone vs Samsung country. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-16 03:48:00 UTC

  • Q&A: Curt, Why Is There White Trash?

    [W]HY IS THERE WHITE TRASH?

    —Curt: Can you explain the whole white trash phenomenon? How can a country so wealthy and full of opportunities have white trash? I anticipate that your answer is likely to be “it’s all IQ” or something along these lines, but aren’t there opportunities for dumb people as well?—-

    “All happy families are the same. All unhappy families are different”
    “All domesticate-able animals are the same. All un-domesticate-able animals are different”
    “All ‘good’ people are the same, all ‘bad’ people are different”

    IQ is correlative, but insufficient explanation for cause. But personality is sufficient.

    If we take all these variables:

    Visualization challenged vs Visualization/spatial intelligence
    Communication challenged vs Verbal intelligence
    autistic vs solipsistic
    introversion vs extroversion

    constancy vs novelty
    disciplined vs undisciplined
    secure/calm vs nervous/sensitive

    compassionate/cooperative vs suspicious/antagonistic
    Impulsivity vs non-impulsivity
    submissive vs aggressive

    With just these variables, we humans have the ability to construct cooperative, disciplined and satisfied minds, or aggressive, undisciplined and unsatisfied minds.

    The reason people in the bottom classes are generally difficult to employ MIGHT be intelligence, but all research I have read of late (when we see pseudoscience slowly receding in social science) is pretty consistent in stating that the unemployable people are just ‘bad personalities’. Much of the time it is that they constantly get negative feedback for their behaviors, and this effectively drives all of us into frustration.

    White trash is a minority in western civilization but in many cultures it’s the majority. Our culture systematically eliminated these people over many centuries. So they are smaller in number, but now rapidly breeding.

    It’s not all IQ. It is just that IQ and ‘good’ behaviors very often increase accordingly. Or that IQ allows us to COMPENSATE for our bad behaviors while lack of it forces us to give into those bad behaviors.

    INFORMATION
    I use the information model to study human behavior. And so I focus on the fact that all of these behaviors are constructed by the ability to organize and process information that gives us hormonal (chemical) rewards. Broken people have less ability to gain psychic rewards. Healthy people have more opportunity to gain psychic rewards.

    Each of us has a frustration budget.
    People at the bottom burn through that budget pretty frequently.
    you can have a dumb person with all good traits, and a smart person with all bad traits. It just isn’t that common.

  • The Next Grand Narrative of Man May Be The Long Sought Social Science

    [T]he Next Grand Narrative?

    1) The evolution of all disciplines has been away from myth to reason to calculation: a set of operations. (Webber). 

    2) I think that the output narrative produced by this age will look far more like social science than philosophy.

    3) I think that just as previous revolutions in the the sciences have produced useful but less fulfilling visions of the universe, that this revolution in human understanding will be the long sought after social science, and that it will be equally useful but unsatisfying.

    4) I think the only reason postmodernism succeeded – like pseudosciences that birthed it: Boaz(anthropology), Freud(psychology), Marx(economics and sociology), Cantor(mathematics), Keynes (mathematical economics), and the Frankfurt School (Use of Falsehood and Strawman) – was that the thinkers of the early 20th century failed to solve the problem of calculations (Operations) in social science: Brouwer (math), Bridgman(Physics), Mises (economics), Hayek(Law), Popper (philosophy). In each field, someone understood at least vaguely that the solution was in a single direction, but they could not produce a science – social science – from it.

    5) I think there are two reasons that they failed: a) the competition from pseudosciences was preferred by all, particularly, the academy that sought to replace the moral authority of the churches. b) the authors themselves were not able to make the same disassociation from the framing of moral intuition that was Einstein in in s framing of gravity. In fact, there is a moral sensibility to every thinker’s arguments. So the cause of their arguments (a sense of immorality to the pseudosciences) was too influenced by moral intuitions of their own cultures.

    6) I am fairly sure I know the basic structure of this science, and I am fairly sure that it is useful, true, and as usual: unsatisfying.