Dear Muslim world. You don’t get it yet, do you? In our civilization, our words are promises, not wishes. You do not threaten white civilization unless you expect us to interpret it as a promise. We are trained from birth to speak only in testimony, and ‘deflationary truth’.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-22 11:19:00 UTC
THE DEFLATIONARY SPECIALIZATION OF WESTERN CIV.
1 – Athens Intellectual Utopianism (Idealism) (Gossip) – LONDON
2 – Rome Commercial Pragmatism (Realism) (Trade) – NE AMER.
3 – Sparta Martial Conservatism (Skepticism) (Force) – GERMANY
Western Civ (like africa) was unable to capture a monopoly (water) resource as was china, north india, and the middle east. so it took longer to develop wealth through more distributed commerce, because of greater opportunity costs, instead of having the advantage of Mesopotamian or yellow river or indus river civilizations and their warmer climates. Asymmetry of environmental calories alone was prohibited.
However, this apparent disadvantage forced the formation of a very different form of equally distributed capital in every possible part of society.
This distribution caused an opportunity for sovereignty (egalitarian reciprocity) to evolve when combined with metal, wheel and horse.
While I attribute Sovereignty to western martial order, and almost all of western achievement due to sovereignty, I am still unable to quite put together how western ‘obsession’ with deflationary reasoning right down to the very structure of our language, is necessarily a consequence? Is it merely that the principal function of truthfulness is deflation? That seems to be the case. But why would that result in deflationary institutions? Deflated methods of communication? Is it just the consequence of a civlization governed by all intents and purposes by a family-funded militia that invested heavily in heavy weaponry and training in every era?
This is why Africa is so interesting to me. Because it seems to me that a christian Africa, with the disadvantage of it’s vast underclass, should simply take longer to develop than other civilizations. Africa does not have the geographic advantage of the levant or the steppe, so that it cannot so easily have gained information from other civilizations. the scale of the desert is inconceivable to all but the Chinese who are equally separated by it.
my view is that christianity grants one another status signals and virtue signals for improving trust, by discounting slights, and thereby making it much easier to develop a commercial order than other religions. Except that europeans developed this behavior more than a thousand years before christianity was imagined. But maybe the current order requires a ‘christianity’ or its equivalent to move the lower classes into higher tolerance for slights, and placing more ‘bets’ on opportunities for cooperation and trade?
Back to deflationary truth – all I can get is that deflationary truth leads to specialization, and specialization to competition between elites? That is the only answer I can come up with. It is fine to speak in myth as long as you don’t bring it into commercial law? Is this all it is? The competition between elites forces the elites in each method of communication to specialize in their method while not justifying the others, in order to seek status among peers?
That is all I can model evolving.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-21 13:19:00 UTC
YES WE CAN RESTORE WESTERN CIVILIZATION – EASILY —“It appears that a golden bullet would be to reduce the value of [false] advertising, and this ineffectiveness would lead to the media industry being starved of revenue. Any suggestions on how this could be achieved?”—- Julian le Roux GREAT QUESTION!!!! YES!
YES WE CAN RESTORE WESTERN CIVILIZATION – EASILY —“It appears that a golden bullet would be to reduce the value of [false] advertising, and this ineffectiveness would lead to the media industry being starved of revenue. Any suggestions on how this could be achieved?”—- Julian le Roux GREAT QUESTION!!!! YES!
WESTERN CIVILIZATION MADE WHOLE The Cult of Non-Submission The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Sovereign Men
WESTERN CIVILIZATION MADE WHOLE The Cult of Non-Submission The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Sovereign Men
THE ERROR OF THE ANCIENTS: TALKING BIZ WAS “OH, SO, BOURGEOISE” Aside from the conquest of the west by byzantine mysticism, the central problem of western philosophy was thinking and ruling classes avoidance of the centrality of economics. We get philosophy to circumvent the traditional law. And we get science to circumvent the traditional church. And we finally get jewish pseudoscience and puritan outright deceit as ways of circumventing science, economics, an law. Economics really doesn’t come into being until smith’s combination of it with ethics, morality, and politics, or turn into a science until menger. Then just as the german scientific revolution is about to kick in, we get the wars, and the postwar era keynes replaces pseudoscience with obscurantist immoral mathematics that menger and smith had sought to avoid. Then the americans kick in – so proud they are to have found a way to destroy civilization faster using stocks as money.
THE ERROR OF THE ANCIENTS: TALKING BIZ WAS “OH, SO, BOURGEOISE” Aside from the conquest of the west by byzantine mysticism, the central problem of western philosophy was thinking and ruling classes avoidance of the centrality of economics. We get philosophy to circumvent the traditional law. And we get science to circumvent the traditional church. And we finally get jewish pseudoscience and puritan outright deceit as ways of circumventing science, economics, an law. Economics really doesn’t come into being until smith’s combination of it with ethics, morality, and politics, or turn into a science until menger. Then just as the german scientific revolution is about to kick in, we get the wars, and the postwar era keynes replaces pseudoscience with obscurantist immoral mathematics that menger and smith had sought to avoid. Then the americans kick in – so proud they are to have found a way to destroy civilization faster using stocks as money.
ARISTOCRACY AS AGENCY, AND THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CLASS STRUCTURES. Eli Harman makes a very important point, that I should, and we all should consider, when we refer to western man: that when constructing a class of Western man that we call ‘aristocracy’, which is a ‘class’ regardless of social and economic class, are we in fact referring to the preference for, necessity of, and selection for ‘Agency’? We use the term time preference; we use the term impulsivity. But these terms refer to the ‘negatives’ without stating a positive that is informative and testable. I use the term truthful. Others rational. But isn’t the central question agency? Isn’t that the question going into battle? Isn’t that the question building a social order? Isn’t that a question building a ruling class? Isn’t that a question building a judiciary class? isn’t that a question building an entrepreneurial class (Field Officers)? Isn’t that a question building a administrative class (lieutenants)? Even building the managerial class (sergeants)? Isn’t it a facsimile of agency that we build in military training? How to ‘report’ (testify), how to hold formation, how to overcome fear, embarrassment, emotion, exhaustion, pain, through training? Isn’t that military training the involuntary construction of stoicism? isn’t stoicism the construction of agency? Isn’t Aristocracy the achievement of agency? Isn’t that what Sovereignty results in? Agency? Isn’t Sovereignty an existential Condition in-fact, but Agency the Resource that makes Sovereignty both cognitively possible, and reciprocally necessary for the condition to exist? This is one of the questions I have been trying to solve for the past few years: Aristocracy consists of a class, like the military consists of a class: Priesthood(gossip), Scientist(craftsman), Aristocracy (force). And that one can join the aristocracy at many levels in society, just as one can join the military at many levels in society. We join aristocracy through the pursuit of sovereignty, through the use of agency(stoicism), and through the use of loyalty (shareholder contract). We construct horizontal classes: genetic class, social class, economic class. And we construct vertical classes: Priestly(gossip), Scientific (innovation and production), and Aristocratic (force). One of my own mistakes has been misconstruing the hierarchy of production, which is scientific, entrepreneurial, financial (administrative), craftsmanly(managerial), and laboring (transforming) classes as science vs craft and this was an error driven by the western tendency for the priesthood to fund ‘writing’ (gossip) intellectuals, and the aristocracy to fund engineers and artists (action) intellectuals. Like everyone else, despite identifying the three methods of coercion as three sets of elites, I gave too much emphasis to horizontal class structures, and not enough to vertical. I’ll continue to work on this analytically. But Eli has been framing this for a while now, and I just gleaned his insight. Curt Doolittle
ARISTOCRACY AS AGENCY, AND THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CLASS STRUCTURES. Eli Harman makes a very important point, that I should, and we all should consider, when we refer to western man: that when constructing a class of Western man that we call ‘aristocracy’, which is a ‘class’ regardless of social and economic class, are we in fact referring to the preference for, necessity of, and selection for ‘Agency’? We use the term time preference; we use the term impulsivity. But these terms refer to the ‘negatives’ without stating a positive that is informative and testable. I use the term truthful. Others rational. But isn’t the central question agency? Isn’t that the question going into battle? Isn’t that the question building a social order? Isn’t that a question building a ruling class? Isn’t that a question building a judiciary class? isn’t that a question building an entrepreneurial class (Field Officers)? Isn’t that a question building a administrative class (lieutenants)? Even building the managerial class (sergeants)? Isn’t it a facsimile of agency that we build in military training? How to ‘report’ (testify), how to hold formation, how to overcome fear, embarrassment, emotion, exhaustion, pain, through training? Isn’t that military training the involuntary construction of stoicism? isn’t stoicism the construction of agency? Isn’t Aristocracy the achievement of agency? Isn’t that what Sovereignty results in? Agency? Isn’t Sovereignty an existential Condition in-fact, but Agency the Resource that makes Sovereignty both cognitively possible, and reciprocally necessary for the condition to exist? This is one of the questions I have been trying to solve for the past few years: Aristocracy consists of a class, like the military consists of a class: Priesthood(gossip), Scientist(craftsman), Aristocracy (force). And that one can join the aristocracy at many levels in society, just as one can join the military at many levels in society. We join aristocracy through the pursuit of sovereignty, through the use of agency(stoicism), and through the use of loyalty (shareholder contract). We construct horizontal classes: genetic class, social class, economic class. And we construct vertical classes: Priestly(gossip), Scientific (innovation and production), and Aristocratic (force). One of my own mistakes has been misconstruing the hierarchy of production, which is scientific, entrepreneurial, financial (administrative), craftsmanly(managerial), and laboring (transforming) classes as science vs craft and this was an error driven by the western tendency for the priesthood to fund ‘writing’ (gossip) intellectuals, and the aristocracy to fund engineers and artists (action) intellectuals. Like everyone else, despite identifying the three methods of coercion as three sets of elites, I gave too much emphasis to horizontal class structures, and not enough to vertical. I’ll continue to work on this analytically. But Eli has been framing this for a while now, and I just gleaned his insight. Curt Doolittle