Theme: Civilization

  • My sister is spinning wool. On a spinning wheel. Watching Norwegian women spin w

    My sister is spinning wool. On a spinning wheel. Watching Norwegian women spin wool directly from sheared sheep. And I am thinking (with some degree of seriousness) that the industrialization of farming was a good thing – farming is hard and unnatural for man. And that it’s hard to argue with the value of electricity that freed women from the hard work of washing and cleaning. And it is very hard to argue with the value of electronic information systems. But as far as I can tell, there is very little in this world that has benefitted from industrial manufacturing and assembly. Wood and Brick were much better for us than steel and concrete and glass. And one hope I have for ‘printing’ is that printed things, assembled by hand, or designed and assembled locally will eradicate the centralized and industrialized capital that has been so bad for us.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-07 13:03:00 UTC

  • ITS LAW NOT ECONOMICS – THE FALSE DICHOTOMY We fail at communism and a hundred m

    ITS LAW NOT ECONOMICS – THE FALSE DICHOTOMY

    We fail at communism and a hundred million die.

    We fail at capitalism, create cronyism, and a civilization dies.

    We fail at natural law and give birth to capitalism and communism and everything in between.

    If we succeed at natural law, we create markets not capitalism.

    And our civilization will flourish – yet again.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-07 09:58:00 UTC

  • The Integration of Christianity into Aryanism (Markets in Everything)

    Germanization of Christianity serves as the extension of ARYAN commercial behavior (markets in everything) into all walks of life public and private. But what requirements in exchange? Integration. And without integration?  Ostracization from the value of markets in everything. You must integrate fully, leave, or die.  

  • The Integration of Christianity into Aryanism (Markets in Everything)

    Germanization of Christianity serves as the extension of ARYAN commercial behavior (markets in everything) into all walks of life public and private. But what requirements in exchange? Integration. And without integration?  Ostracization from the value of markets in everything. You must integrate fully, leave, or die.  

  • Via Negativa of Gods

    VIA-NEGATIVA OF GODS Rome was pagan all along, and christians were a tiny minority, The emperor’s emphasis on the SI cult was somewhat of an attempt to bring unity (monotheism) to the empire, by expanding the cult of mithras. Its fairly obvious that the christians basically attempted to defeat the martial cult of the western roman empire by appropriating mithraism, the sol invictus cult, and the submission demanded of the jewish and persion and egyptians gods, and then justified it later with the biblical readings and instittions. So the army was infected by exposure to the persians from alexander onward. We already practice polytheism today. The question is not which gods we will all follow, but WHICH GODS WE WILL OUTLAW AND DESTROY. Let me say that again. Via Negativa: We destroy the false gods, the false rationalism, and the false sciences, and only the true gods, the true rationalisms, and the true sciences remain. WE NEED NOT INVENT NEW GODS TO FOLLOW BUT DEFEAT ALL GODS THAT ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH NATURAL LAW

  • Via Negativa of Gods

    VIA-NEGATIVA OF GODS Rome was pagan all along, and christians were a tiny minority, The emperor’s emphasis on the SI cult was somewhat of an attempt to bring unity (monotheism) to the empire, by expanding the cult of mithras. Its fairly obvious that the christians basically attempted to defeat the martial cult of the western roman empire by appropriating mithraism, the sol invictus cult, and the submission demanded of the jewish and persion and egyptians gods, and then justified it later with the biblical readings and instittions. So the army was infected by exposure to the persians from alexander onward. We already practice polytheism today. The question is not which gods we will all follow, but WHICH GODS WE WILL OUTLAW AND DESTROY. Let me say that again. Via Negativa: We destroy the false gods, the false rationalism, and the false sciences, and only the true gods, the true rationalisms, and the true sciences remain. WE NEED NOT INVENT NEW GODS TO FOLLOW BUT DEFEAT ALL GODS THAT ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH NATURAL LAW

  • The Central Works of Philosophy: John Shand’s List

    1  Plato: Republic 2  Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics 3  Lucretius: On the Nature of the Universe 4  Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Pyrrhonism 5  Plotinus: The Enneads 6  Augustine: City of God 7  Anselm: Proslogion 8  Aquinas: Summa Theologiae 9  Duns Scotus: Ordinatio 10  William of Ockham: Summa Logicae 1 René Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy 2 Baruch Spinoza: Ethics 3 G. W. Leibniz: Monadology 4 Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan 5 John Locke: An Essay concerning Human Understanding 6 George Berkeley: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge 7 David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature 8 Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Social Contract 1 Immanuel Kant: Critique of Pure Reason 2 Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Foundations of the Entire Science of Knowledge 3 G. W. F. Hegel: Phenomenology of Spirit 4 Arthur Schopenhauer: The World as Will and Representation 5 John Stuart Mill: On Liberty 6 Søren Kierkegaard: Philosophical Fragments 7 Karl Marx: Capital 8 Friedrich Nietzsche: The Genealogy of Morals 1. G. E. Moore: Principia Ethica 2. Edmund Husserl: The Idea of Phenomenology 3. William James: Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking 4. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 5. Martin Heidegger: Being and Time 6. Rudolf Carnap: The Logical Structure of the World 7. Bertrand Russell: An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth 8. Jean-Paul Sartre: Being and Nothingness 9. Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Phenomenology of Perception 10. A. J. Ayer Language, Truth and Logic 11. Gilbert Ryle: The Concept of Mind 12. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophical Investigations 13. Karl Popper: The Logic of Scientific Discovery 1.W. V. Quine: Word and Object 2. P. F. Strawson: Individuals 3. John Rawls: A Theory of Justice 4. Robert Nozick: Anarchy, State, and Utopia 5. Michael Dummett: Truth and Other Enigmas 6. Richard Rorty: Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature 7. Donald Davidson: Essays on Actions and Events 8. Saul Kripke: Naming and Necessity 9. Hilary Putnam: Reason, Truth and History 10. Bernard Williams: Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy 11. Thomas Nagel: The View From Nowhere 12. David Lewis: On the Plurality of Worlds 13. Charles Taylor: Sources of the Self 14. John McDowell: Mind and World

  • Provoking Thoughts: Man’s First Occupation: Predator

    The Greatest Happiness? To crush your enemies. To scatter and drive them before you. To burn their cities to ashes. To take their possessions. To hear the wails of their women. And, To rape their wives and daughters. That is what is best in life. As a few have noticed. By posting a quote by Genghis Khan, I was making a fairly serious statement. (Not the least of which was de-christianizing the translation of the original quote (which, if I remember correctly was spoken in mongolian, written down phonetically using *chinese* characters, translated into persian, translated into german, and then translated into english. I’m not positive but most of the ‘secret history’ followed that route. ) Now, in the context in which I made that post, I was trying to illustrate a few things at once: 1) That hunting man and animal *is* his preferred profession. And that man is not Rousseauian. It is not surprising that all other variations of the semi-sentient apes were exterminated upon our arrival. Nor why the only competition the great plagues have had is Islam first and communism second. 2) That we have spent a great deal of effort ‘regulating’ man’s preferred profession. And that the many achievements of man were made by suppressing that profession 3) **BUT**, that to CHOOSE the method of suppressing that profession requires we preserve that profession: hunting, killing, destroying, and taking – we can construct many orders from enslavement on one end to markets on the other. 4) And to preserve that profession such that we create the advanced order that we have in the ancient and modern worlds requires the Aryan (markets) and the Christian (the extirpation of hatred from the human heart.) 5) Because there is a vast difference between predation and parasitism of the khan, and the conquest and rule of people by the production of markets through which they transcend the beast, the slave, the serf, the freeman, the civilian, the sovereign – and the god. What we have failed to learn (which I am so glad someone reminded me of yesterday) is that having conquered from spain to china, and from the arctic circle to egypt, and having tried to create markets in each of those region, that we failed among all but our own. Therefore the evidence suggests that there is something special about our kin group, tribe, and race that makes markets possible. But if we must preserve the Aryan and the Christian to rule by natural law, we must also preserve the warrior to obtain and hold the condition of natural law. And we must preserve the warrior hunter’s joy and lust in Aryan and Christian forms, so that those that cannot transcend cannot harm us. If they can harm must they can be weakened. If they cannot be weakened they can be exterminated. Not with hatred, and not for profit, but for defense. Not for defense of us alone. But for the defense of human kind. And the transcendence we are inspired to achieve. So, (a) I want to cause you to attempt to disagree with this statement by stating it provocatively, (remember, this is the purpose of hyperbole that conservatives rely upon. the Asians use contradictions to cause you to think. Aristocracy uses hyperbole to cause you to think. (b) I want to force you to face a necessary truth: that violence is just a resource that we can use to create good by the incremental suppression of all means of parasitism – and that to incrementally suppress means of parasitism among hunters, requires that we maintain exceptional skill in hunting, killing, taking, destroying. (c) we created this world by mastering, professionalizing, and using violence to obtain and hold rule, through which we imposed markets, and the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. I experiment a lot. I run tests. All my arguments are tests. Each test constitutes an attempt to construct a proof. When they are complete (closed), parsimonious, and clear my tests are complete, and a proof constructed. But you should not dismiss the difference between an analytic list and an emotive or poetic bit of inspiration. They are attempts to make you (and i) think about those assumptions we hold, beliefs we hold, justifications we feel, and arguments we practice. So that not only are markets created, and not only is hatred extirpated, but that ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, pseudorationalism, and pseudoscience, are removed from our thoughts.

  • Provoking Thoughts: Man’s First Occupation: Predator

    The Greatest Happiness? To crush your enemies. To scatter and drive them before you. To burn their cities to ashes. To take their possessions. To hear the wails of their women. And, To rape their wives and daughters. That is what is best in life. As a few have noticed. By posting a quote by Genghis Khan, I was making a fairly serious statement. (Not the least of which was de-christianizing the translation of the original quote (which, if I remember correctly was spoken in mongolian, written down phonetically using *chinese* characters, translated into persian, translated into german, and then translated into english. I’m not positive but most of the ‘secret history’ followed that route. ) Now, in the context in which I made that post, I was trying to illustrate a few things at once: 1) That hunting man and animal *is* his preferred profession. And that man is not Rousseauian. It is not surprising that all other variations of the semi-sentient apes were exterminated upon our arrival. Nor why the only competition the great plagues have had is Islam first and communism second. 2) That we have spent a great deal of effort ‘regulating’ man’s preferred profession. And that the many achievements of man were made by suppressing that profession 3) **BUT**, that to CHOOSE the method of suppressing that profession requires we preserve that profession: hunting, killing, destroying, and taking – we can construct many orders from enslavement on one end to markets on the other. 4) And to preserve that profession such that we create the advanced order that we have in the ancient and modern worlds requires the Aryan (markets) and the Christian (the extirpation of hatred from the human heart.) 5) Because there is a vast difference between predation and parasitism of the khan, and the conquest and rule of people by the production of markets through which they transcend the beast, the slave, the serf, the freeman, the civilian, the sovereign – and the god. What we have failed to learn (which I am so glad someone reminded me of yesterday) is that having conquered from spain to china, and from the arctic circle to egypt, and having tried to create markets in each of those region, that we failed among all but our own. Therefore the evidence suggests that there is something special about our kin group, tribe, and race that makes markets possible. But if we must preserve the Aryan and the Christian to rule by natural law, we must also preserve the warrior to obtain and hold the condition of natural law. And we must preserve the warrior hunter’s joy and lust in Aryan and Christian forms, so that those that cannot transcend cannot harm us. If they can harm must they can be weakened. If they cannot be weakened they can be exterminated. Not with hatred, and not for profit, but for defense. Not for defense of us alone. But for the defense of human kind. And the transcendence we are inspired to achieve. So, (a) I want to cause you to attempt to disagree with this statement by stating it provocatively, (remember, this is the purpose of hyperbole that conservatives rely upon. the Asians use contradictions to cause you to think. Aristocracy uses hyperbole to cause you to think. (b) I want to force you to face a necessary truth: that violence is just a resource that we can use to create good by the incremental suppression of all means of parasitism – and that to incrementally suppress means of parasitism among hunters, requires that we maintain exceptional skill in hunting, killing, taking, destroying. (c) we created this world by mastering, professionalizing, and using violence to obtain and hold rule, through which we imposed markets, and the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. I experiment a lot. I run tests. All my arguments are tests. Each test constitutes an attempt to construct a proof. When they are complete (closed), parsimonious, and clear my tests are complete, and a proof constructed. But you should not dismiss the difference between an analytic list and an emotive or poetic bit of inspiration. They are attempts to make you (and i) think about those assumptions we hold, beliefs we hold, justifications we feel, and arguments we practice. So that not only are markets created, and not only is hatred extirpated, but that ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, pseudorationalism, and pseudoscience, are removed from our thoughts.

  • Why Were Westerners Unsuccessful At Exporting Aryanism: Markets in Everything?

    WHY WERE WESTERNERS UNSUCCESSFUL AT EXPORTING ARYANISM (MARKETS) by Simon Ström By merely establishing rule, a small minority of conquerors do not have the resources to alter the basic fabric of social organization in a region that is already populous, wealthy and has a rigid socio-political system that works for them and is adapted to the local natural incentives. Like the Mongols in China or Iran, the conquerors are rather the ones who are subject to assimilation, although they might retain or even spread their language and symbolism as a function of its prestige. In order to permeate all society, the imposed, foreign evolutionary strategy must be carried by greater numbers than that, or at least powerful enough mechanisms of overcoming the inertia of “immunological rejection” of non-self cultural impulses. The lesser the primordial differences in genes, culture and natural incentives between conqueror and conquered, the lesser the need of great numbers in order to assimilate through elite dominance. 1. Small minority conquest: dynastic turnover, insignificant gene flow and socio-cultural regression to the median. Examples: Yuan dynasty, Hittites, Gothic Spain, British Raj. (Early Indo-Aryans were close to 1, but gravitated somewhat toward 2) 2. Sizable minority conquest: significant gene flow (amalgamation), socio-cultural regression to the mean. Examples: Corded Ware horizon, Roman Gaul, Latin America. 3. Great majority conquest: displacement, insignificant or no gene flow, complete socio-cultural continuation of the conquerors. Examples: North America, Kosovo, West Bank (future). So the obstacles of exporting our strategy are: – They don’t want it. They can profit from modernization without Westernization. – Military dominance won’t cut it. You need to dominate kinship and the social fabric. – The cost of export is too great because we are too different. Rule might be profitable, but assimilation? Questionable. We have evolved to pursue our strategy for millennia, others have not. – Simon Ström From Curt: The problem with spreading our social order is (a) demographic distribution and (b) degree of civilization. In practice we should see Aryanism (markets for rule) expandable only into areas that did not have the ability to expand the underclass, and did not possess a large underclass, and face little tribal conflict. Conversely we should see the worst behavior among peoples who have expansive underclasses, the agrarian or pastoral ability to expand those underclasses, and lots of territorial competition from other kin groups. And that is what we see