No, the Etruscan gods were the same as the nordic, The Roman laws continued the germanic laws, because the romans “Itals” were Danubian people. The Roman laws were WRITTEN and a continuation of those germanic laws. The Germanics did not tolerate capital punishment.That was Rome.
Truth is enough. If you need lies, then why do you need lies?
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-09 11:46:00 UTC
I mean, you have to ask why, in the ancient world, the tragedy of achilles was as dominant as the bible was in the medieval era, and it constituted the vast majority of the content in alexandria. Why did they replace achilles with this person jesus? That analysis ends debate.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-09 11:45:00 UTC
ABRAHAMISM IS THE GREATEST CANCER EVER INVENTED BY MAN
Our common-law tradition and the militia built the west. We escaped Abrahamic religion, and immediately restored our ancient trajectory. The reason for degeneracy is the reintroduction of Abrahamic Religion in pseudoscientific (marxist) and peudorational (postmodernist) prose
Sorry. I have spent extraordinary effort in testing our most cherished beliefs: and Abrahamism created the dark ages. Jews did nothing. We did very little. And muslims destroyed the four great civilizations of the ancient world – dragging them backward into inescapable ignorance.
Every civilization needs literature, oaths, and festivals for the intergenerational propagation of general rules of decidability that express their group competitive strategy. No civilization needs lies, and Abrahamism in word and form is just lies.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-09 11:22:00 UTC
THERE ARE ONLY TWO SUCCESS STORIES
Don’t be daft. There are only two success stories in history. The far west: a professional militia of kin that create markets, and the far east: a professional bureaucracy of kin that create monopolies. I have no idea why we even pay attention to the fertile crescent. it is an exercise in a professional class of liars (priests). Which is the worst of all possible worlds. Starting first with any technology is a disadvantage because of the cumulative network effect. The chinese avoided religion altogether. The west was conquered by it and has tried repeatedly to escape it. Maybe this time we will be successful in replacing religion with Literature, the Oath, Sports, and Festivals.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-09 10:14:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 11:11:00 UTC
That’s strike two. Um. Study archaeology, economic history, genetics. Particularly neolithic-atlantic copper, Mesolithic civilization, and the conquest by the celts. And the economy of the celts. The Romans destroyed the celts for WEALTH.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 01:14:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982788759539167232
Reply addressees: @Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982787620857176064
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982787620857176064
What does a temporary organizational method like a ‘State’ or ‘Government’ have to do with a civilization? Governments and borders are disposable. And the Han are the largest most homogenous ethnic group. I have no idea where you get your ideas from….
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 01:12:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982788262547750912
Reply addressees: @Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982787179008151552
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982787179008151552
I don’t see that. I see a systemic problem going back to the origins in the late neolithic, passing through the development of their aristocracy in the age of transformation, and continuing to the present. It might be that we drag them out of it, but it doesn’t look encouraging.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 00:59:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982785055041794053
Reply addressees: @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982757932461850625
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982757932461850625
My current opinion is that verbal ability in a population and low vs high context is disproportionately influential on rates of development – and until we have better understanding of the genome I can’t but say “it sure looks like the causal axis”.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 00:47:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982781973826383872
Reply addressees: @Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982779565184466945
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer China is a very old civilization, nearly as remote as the british isles, and following a similar pattern of development. The chinese rate of development was early because of it, very slooooooow for reasons I think I might understand.Vs westerners who were late and very fast.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/982779565184466945
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer China is a very old civilization, nearly as remote as the british isles, and following a similar pattern of development. The chinese rate of development was early because of it, very slooooooow for reasons I think I might understand.Vs westerners who were late and very fast.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/982779565184466945
China is a very old civilization, nearly as remote as the british isles, and following a similar pattern of development. The chinese rate of development was early because of it, very slooooooow for reasons I think I might understand.Vs westerners who were late and very fast.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 00:38:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982779565184466945
Reply addressees: @Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982758779405160448
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982758779405160448