My current opinion is that verbal ability in a population and low vs high context is disproportionately influential on rates of development – and until we have better understanding of the genome I can’t but say “it sure looks like the causal axis”.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 00:47:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982781973826383872
Reply addressees: @Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982779565184466945
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer China is a very old civilization, nearly as remote as the british isles, and following a similar pattern of development. The chinese rate of development was early because of it, very slooooooow for reasons I think I might understand.Vs westerners who were late and very fast.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/982779565184466945
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer China is a very old civilization, nearly as remote as the british isles, and following a similar pattern of development. The chinese rate of development was early because of it, very slooooooow for reasons I think I might understand.Vs westerners who were late and very fast.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/982779565184466945
Leave a Reply