(FB 1549159120 Timestamp) —“The two greatest iron mines in this parts of Asia are located (1) by the Van-lake, and (2) by the Azov-lake… A good a reason as any to inflict war and competition between the Asas and the Vans.”— azov=north of black sea in southern russia. van = south of black sea in e anatolia.
Theme: Civilization
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549308177 Timestamp) —“Hi sir, do you believe sports like the NFL and NBA play a role in placating the modern western man?— a Friend Hmmm…, all civ’s that have military cultures have sports, primarily to make men fit for war. I think that the problem with the NFL is that (a) there aren’t enough teams (b) they aren’t local enough (c) the money is too concentrated rather than largely (like soccer) getting everyone involved. –“Seems very right, thank you for your insight”– cheers
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549301321 Timestamp) Um. The Black sea is origin of indo european peoples and the evidence is pretty clear. But all west asians are related, with lighter and fairer in the west, darker in the east, and bigger nosed in the south. Minoans were indigenous europeans. Greek common people were indigenous europeans (old europe -west black sea – metal workers). As far as I know the greek aristocracy (dorians et all) came from the north. The early anatolians(hittites) could have come trough either east or west passage. Evidence is very clear that the black sea, caucuses, caucasian-iranic caspian, to afghanistan and northern india and into mongolia (turkic) provided a gradient of west asians exiting the ice age as distinct racial groups. (africans, west asians, east asians, dravidians, southeast asians – I tend to classify dravidians as a distinct race not only because of size and geography because it’s hard not to.) Today india is 70-30 to 30-70 caucasian to dravidian in a progressive spectrum from north to south. I prefer to treat india as a race, civilization because it is an injustice to do otherwise. I don’t understand the indian origins thing. it’s like the nazi fantasy. (although there was an element of truth to both). I do understand that the indus river civilization was early and optimum – but also that it was wiped out. It is this constant difficulty with inability to defend itself that makes me wonder about what I see as the excellence of hindu ‘religion’ (‘way of life’) vs inability of self defense. Similar to germany whose philosophy is nonsense but whose ability to defend herself is amazing. I mean, conquering india requires little more than ‘showing up’. Why? India survives like russia survives: scale and climate. There is no value in expansion for indians so there is insufficient militarism. IMO the problem is that the unification was a mistake, and that many states of india would be superior if organized like many states of europe. Just as america would be superior if organized like many states of europe. There are some very difficult questions here to answer and the optimum cultural method (‘the way’), and the optimum means of self defense (The opposite of the way) and the means of communicating them (myth, philosophy, law, science) … seems almost unresolvable. But as always I am still working at understanding india, because she is the ‘outlier’ among the great civilizations, and as far as I an tell it is because of the lack of need or want of conquest. And I don’t like the ‘it’s all colonialism’s fault” because history says “it’s the inability of india to organize against conquerors” that’s the problem. Just as I say, “The west is defeated by the same abrahamic deception in the modern world as in the ancient. So is it our fault for allowing it again? Or the fault of abrahamic peoples for exploiting our weakness? The man in the mirror is the man at fault.”
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549309327 Timestamp) COPPERHEAD (plural Copperheads) (US, obsolete, slang) A northerner who sympathized with the South or wanted to end hostilities during the American Civil War.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549308177 Timestamp) —“Hi sir, do you believe sports like the NFL and NBA play a role in placating the modern western man?— a Friend Hmmm…, all civ’s that have military cultures have sports, primarily to make men fit for war. I think that the problem with the NFL is that (a) there aren’t enough teams (b) they aren’t local enough (c) the money is too concentrated rather than largely (like soccer) getting everyone involved. –“Seems very right, thank you for your insight”– cheers
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549301321 Timestamp) Um. The Black sea is origin of indo european peoples and the evidence is pretty clear. But all west asians are related, with lighter and fairer in the west, darker in the east, and bigger nosed in the south. Minoans were indigenous europeans. Greek common people were indigenous europeans (old europe -west black sea – metal workers). As far as I know the greek aristocracy (dorians et all) came from the north. The early anatolians(hittites) could have come trough either east or west passage. Evidence is very clear that the black sea, caucuses, caucasian-iranic caspian, to afghanistan and northern india and into mongolia (turkic) provided a gradient of west asians exiting the ice age as distinct racial groups. (africans, west asians, east asians, dravidians, southeast asians – I tend to classify dravidians as a distinct race not only because of size and geography because it’s hard not to.) Today india is 70-30 to 30-70 caucasian to dravidian in a progressive spectrum from north to south. I prefer to treat india as a race, civilization because it is an injustice to do otherwise. I don’t understand the indian origins thing. it’s like the nazi fantasy. (although there was an element of truth to both). I do understand that the indus river civilization was early and optimum – but also that it was wiped out. It is this constant difficulty with inability to defend itself that makes me wonder about what I see as the excellence of hindu ‘religion’ (‘way of life’) vs inability of self defense. Similar to germany whose philosophy is nonsense but whose ability to defend herself is amazing. I mean, conquering india requires little more than ‘showing up’. Why? India survives like russia survives: scale and climate. There is no value in expansion for indians so there is insufficient militarism. IMO the problem is that the unification was a mistake, and that many states of india would be superior if organized like many states of europe. Just as america would be superior if organized like many states of europe. There are some very difficult questions here to answer and the optimum cultural method (‘the way’), and the optimum means of self defense (The opposite of the way) and the means of communicating them (myth, philosophy, law, science) … seems almost unresolvable. But as always I am still working at understanding india, because she is the ‘outlier’ among the great civilizations, and as far as I an tell it is because of the lack of need or want of conquest. And I don’t like the ‘it’s all colonialism’s fault” because history says “it’s the inability of india to organize against conquerors” that’s the problem. Just as I say, “The west is defeated by the same abrahamic deception in the modern world as in the ancient. So is it our fault for allowing it again? Or the fault of abrahamic peoples for exploiting our weakness? The man in the mirror is the man at fault.”
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549309327 Timestamp) COPPERHEAD (plural Copperheads) (US, obsolete, slang) A northerner who sympathized with the South or wanted to end hostilities during the American Civil War.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549396022 Timestamp) “Everybody wants to be a Viking until it’s time to do Viking sh-t.”—Eli Harman 😉
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1549377883 Timestamp) Itâs a very simple difference. Agency vs Submission. Heathens (Pagans in the pejorative) in western civilization are imagined heroes in competition with the spirits(dead), non-humans(green man, primitive man), demigods(powerful but mortal), and gods (powerful and immortal), and can, by effort and cunning outwit them â or â negotiate (bribe) them. This is a universal artifact of the conquest and replacement of european peoples by the westward expansion of the indo-europeans (Yaman, Corded ware et al) and their Militaristic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, Metalsmithing, business of profiting from the domestication of animal man, with horse, bronze, wheel and their very visible power over nature. It is a religion of agency not submission. Demand for a âreligion of empiresâ increases with the distribution of peoples under rule, and the group strategies of those people under rule, and the compatibilities of those groupâs strategies under such a universal rule. The semitic methodology of INVERTING the aristocratic (western) ethos by converting the bible of greco roman civilization (iliad of homer) which occupied the vast majority of writings in the greco roman period, with a âheroâ of âsubmission and resistanceâ was an interesting strategy by which the vast underclasses of the old european (byzantine), and greco-anatolian, syrian levantine world could create a resistance movement by the cultural destruction of their superiors, Just as the Marxists (Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno et al, Rothbard, and the neocons) repeated 1700 years later (monopoly marxism of private property, monopoly marxism of common property, monopoly marxism of identity-property (culture)). The Semitic method of undermining was as successful in the Modern world (undermining colonialism) as it was in the ancient world (undermining colonialism). False promise of salvation after death. False promise of economic salvation. False promise of cultural (identity) salvation. The method of using sophism (false promise + sophism (Pilpul) + Straw Manning (Critique) is in fact a successful method of undermining a civilization that is overwhelmed by overextension, and profiting from overextension through commerce, and the dependence of commerce at international scales on trust. Christianity succeeded because trade collapsed in europe after (a) undermining by jewish-christian vanguard, (b) enforcement by byzantine (old world, greek) defeat of rome, and (c) collapse of world trade under arab-muslim expansion, (d) and the eventual consumption of all capital of the great civilizations of the ancient world, and the destruction of all those civilizations as a consequence. So, as trade and knowledge increased, europeans gradually (expectedly) extracted themselves from Semitic superstition, the churchâsâ monopoly on information and literacy, the 50% of dead capital in europe under the church. and the corruption of the church as a monopoly federal government selling false receipts of salvation the way the current academy sells false diplomas. Given that the remains of Christianity are what leave us vulnerable to Semiticism (abrahamic monotheism, marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism, and the use of false promise, sophism, straw-manning, and the discount on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, moralizing, rallying as a substitute for truthful (scientific, rational) argument. It is only logical that the aristocratic right in Europe (using literary philosophy, moralism, and history) and aristocratic right in the States (using law and, economics, and science) should produce arguments to restore our native religion of the hearth to one that is heroic and expansionary rather than submissive and assisting in our surrender. Nothing in human behavior or history is difficult. Itâs all simple. Once you understand that nearly all use of language is simply means of lying in order to obtain discounts on the acquisition of the power to alter the probability of outcomes in oneâs favor. And all we do is search for narratives to echo (script). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine https://arktos.com/2018/10/31/alain-de-benoist-paganism-and-the-neo-christian-west/
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549364740 Timestamp) —“Thirty centuries of history allow us to look with supreme pity on certain doctrines which are preached beyond the Alps by the descendants of those who were illiterate when Rome had Caesar, Virgil, and Augustus.” — Benito Mussolini Let’s recall that the Ital’s were from beyond the alps, conquered a more advanced people (Etru) who were also from beyond the alps, and imported all their knowledge from either the Etru, Carthaginians (navy), or Greece. With their principle contributory excellence being bureaucracy and law. (Which is propertarianism: law)