Theme: Causality

  • The why is trivial. And explained above. Even if you don’t recognize it. And its

    The why is trivial. And explained above. Even if you don’t recognize it. And its boring. And it mean’s we’re the deterministic outcome of a fringe permutation under niche conditions. The consequence of intersecting ripples in a vast pond. We aren’t special. The chaos of the universe could eradicated us easily at any moment, and nearly has many times. There is nothing supernatural in the universe. There are no spirits. No gods. Just us. Our little planet. Each other. And our struggle to defeat the dark forces of time and ignorance.
    And that’s possible with truth. Even if lies are comforting.

    Reply addressees: @Scatolalia


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-10 22:19:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656423799678554114

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656421835427250176

  • I don’t make excuses. I just ‘science’ everything down to first principles, and

    I don’t make excuses. I just ‘science’ everything down to first principles, and describe it as physics of the physical world, or the equivalent of physics in the behavioral world: reciprocal economic terms, and the physics of the evolutionary word: consequences.

    I don’t have a simplistic view of much of anything. What I have is a scientific understanding of nearly everything. Because operational logic, physics economics and evolution aren’t opinions. The problem I’ve faced is that writing all of that content is a vast project, but any casual perusal of any part of the work that is in draft form is as unassailable as geometry.

    That isn’t to say that people don’t need ‘feels’, and myths, and religions, for cooperation and mindfulness, because they are largely unfit for the world as it is – but it does allow me to judge (that’s my job) true/false, possible/not, ethical/not, moral/not, right/wrong, good/bad, regardless of feels. πŸ˜‰

    No one really wants the truth except to stop some group of liars, cheaters, and thieves from lying cheating and stealing, while permitting themselves to continue lying, cheating, stealing. πŸ˜‰

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212 @ToddNQuick1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-08 17:15:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655622585973972992

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655605917319086081

  • I can. I can also understand data and make claims of the causal and deterministi

    I can. I can also understand data and make claims of the causal and deterministic ends of aggregate effects.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-07 22:51:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655344639497338883

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1655343981998342147

  • You’re correct. Causal Sequence: (a) race differences in neoteny (b) race differ

    You’re correct. Causal Sequence: (a) race differences in neoteny (b) race differences in rate and depth of maturity (c) race differences in intolerance, aggression, and impulsivity. Causal Conditions: selection for cooperation during isolation during expansion, especially in…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-06 20:03:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654939915174412291

    Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir @freeusefulinfo @huangkuan @RichardHanania

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654938776190451712

  • @DajaniRiad 1) We know the paradigm (first principles, causal hierarchy), logic,

    @DajaniRiad
    1) We know the paradigm (first principles, causal hierarchy), logic, and grammar of the universe, including not only physics, but neurology, psychology, sociology, politics, and group evolutionary strategy.

    2) We know the logic of decidability across all human cooperation and conflict at all scales.

    3) It’s trivially simple once you grasp it, but just as Galileo, Darwin, and Menger gave us knowledge we didn’t like, and the Greeks and Romans Knowledge the middle east despised, and so does the knowledge of the science and logic of human behavior.

    4) Why? Because it means suppression of the reproduction of the demonstrably unfit is necessary, and that necessity is impossible to overcome (soft eugenics), and that the systematic postwar suppression of research into and expression of human differences is equal to a fundamentalist revolution suppressing knowledge in prior ages.

    πŸ™

    Reply addressees: @SovereigntyKing @DajaniRiad @BrianRoemmele


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-06 18:59:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654923914626097153

  • We have identified at least at thousand SNP variations that contribute to IQ, an

    We have identified at least at thousand SNP variations that contribute to IQ, and that’s not enough for prediction because all genetic expression is probabalistic in competition during development – though the difference as I said, as with almost all variation from the other great apes is almost entirely by neotenic selection causing decreases in expression as stem cells migrate outward from the neural tube, slowing maturity giving greater time for development, under lower pressure of maturity, but at higher risk.

    The authority on the subject is the largest lab doing the most work (Reich’s) and he has been not so subtly warning the academic world that the scale of the differences between the races is contrary to the postwar suppression of biological differences in response to the German adoption of american eugenics research and practice informed by Darwin and Spencer – who was the most influential philosopher prior to the world wars.

    So you are welcome to try to find someone who understands these subjects better than I do – and you will find people who understand the stats, others who understand the biochemistry, others who understand the genetics, but as far as I know there aren’t many people who understand the operation of the brain better than I do, because in order to write about and teach the subject, I’ve had to exhaust that research. And there just isn’t anyone that’s outside of a small section of the AI commumity that seems to have a basic understanding of just how simple it is after all -despite the anxieties of philosophers.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Nick65979825 @UsingLyft


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:37:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654118007227006976

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654114649489522688

  • RE: ~”IQ ISN”T A PHYSICAL MEASURE”~ (short explanation of what causes IQ differe

    RE: ~”IQ ISN”T A PHYSICAL MEASURE”~
    (short explanation of what causes IQ differences)

    That’s in correct. Neural conductivity follows the same mathematical law as wires and undersea cables, where the law was first discovered. So neural response time is precisely what we are measuring.

    The rest is determined by the organization of connectivity as neural stem cells migrate into position, and various of thirty or so molecules bait the tips of each cell into different regions of the brain, until they recieve enough impulse to form local inter-neuronal connectivity and begin ‘computing’ so to speak. Then finally the overall size of the brain (size matters), grey vs white matter density, and the environment that consists of the biochemistry of your brain that feeds the neurons, and the many developmental ‘errors’ that creep in due to accumulated genetic load (defects), and one evolutoinary difference Neoteny.

    The uncomfortable truth that the scientific community suppresses out of self interest in survival is that human differences are due largely to on direction of evolution: neotenic selection, which trades aggression (impulse) for agency (consideration) necessary for social cooperation in increasingly scarce climates. Ergo the reason for performance differences between the four primary races is substantial, manifesting as difference in sizes of the classes, where social and economic class reflect the ability to posses the traits and intelligence to manage self regulation and therefore responsibility, because that is what humans have selected for: responsibility via neoteny.

    Hence we observe IQ and neotenic differences by the four speciation events (Races): 1SD African to South Eurasion, 1SD South Eurasian To European and East Asian. And NW Europeans (north sea) have already lost 1SD from around 115 in early modernity to 100-102 today due to asymmetric reproduction. East asians are losing – particularly the Chinese, and Ashkenazim are losing too. Reason? Urbanization. Cities are IQ sinks because of the cost of children for high investment parents, and the cost of education, and women delaying reproduction for education and employement, versus the irrelevance of the cost of children for low investment parents.

    So we attempt to judge the QUALITY of the organization of your brain with IQ tests by examining multiple capabilities – specifically among the feminine verbal empathizing vs masculine spatial systematizing division, because all skills roughly increase and decrease in parallel along whatever that sex ratio consist of, thus determining your neural performance, plasticity, and adaptability in time.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:02:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654109218675335170

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654003532847013888

  • RE: ~”IQ ISN”T A PHYSICAL MEASURE”~ (short explanation of what causes IQ differe

    RE: ~”IQ ISN”T A PHYSICAL MEASURE”~
    (short explanation of what causes IQ differences)

    That’s in correct. Neural conductivity follows the same mathematical law as wires and undersea cables, where the law was first discovered. So neural response time is precisely what we are measuring.

    The rest is determined by the organization of connectivity as neural stem cells migrate into position, and various of thirty or so molecules bait the tips of each cell into different regions of the brain, until they recieve enough impulse to form local inter-neuronal connectivity and begin ‘computing’ so to speak. Then finally the overall size of the brain (size matters), grey vs white matter density, and the environment that consists of the biochemistry of your brain that feeds the neurons, and the many developmental ‘errors’ that creep in due to accumulated genetic load (defects), and one evolutoinary difference Neoteny.

    The uncomfortable truth that the scientific community suppresses out of self interest in survival is that human differences are due largely to on direction of evolution: neotenic selection, which trades aggression (impulse) for agency (consideration) necessary for social cooperation in increasingly scarce climates. Ergo the reason for performance differences between the four primary races is substantial, manifesting as difference in sizes of the classes, where social and economic class reflect the ability to posses the traits and intelligence to manage self regulation and therefore responsibility, because that is what humans have selected for: responsibility via neoteny.

    Hence we observe IQ and neotenic differences by the four speciation events (Races): 1SD African to South Eurasion, 1SD South Eurasian To European and East Asian. And NW Europeans (north sea) have already lost 1SD from around 115 in early modernity to 100-102 today due to asymmetric reproduction. East asians are losing – particularly the Chinese, and Ashkenazim are losing too. Reason? Urbanization. Cities are IQ sinks because of the cost of children for high investment parents, and the cost of education, and women delaying reproduction for education and employement, versus the irrelevance of the cost of children for low investment parents.

    So we attempt to judge the QUALITY of the organization of your brain with IQ tests by examining multiple capabilities – specifically among the feminine verbal empathizing vs masculine spatial systematizing division, because all skills roughly increase and decrease in parallel along whatever that sex ratio consist of, thus determining your neural performance, plasticity, and adaptability in time.

    Reply addressees: @Nick65979825 @UsingLyft


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:02:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654109218453045253

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654003532847013888

  • Also: let me help you with a common cogintive error: “a thing is not what it cla

    Also: let me help you with a common cogintive error: “a thing is not what it claims but what outcomes it produces by the means it produces them.” Only by accepting ‘wisdom literature’ (which is the categorical name for these subjects other than science) at face value do you fall into the seduction of the false promise that what is stated is what’s intended, rather than that behavior is produced by suggestion as a consequencde of what’s stated.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 00:25:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653194009521577986

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653193072765796352

  • Also: let me help you with a common cogintive error: “a thing is not what it cla

    Also: let me help you with a common cogintive error: “a thing is not what it claims but what outcomes it produces by the means it produces them.” Only by accepting ‘wisdom literature’ (which is the categorical name for these subjects other than science) at face value do you fall into the seduction of the false promise that what is stated is what’s intended, rather than that behavior is produced by suggestion as a consequencde of what’s stated.

    Reply addressees: @Hamishtadel1 @AmKsheOref @Vessel_of_Glass


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 00:25:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653194009450278916

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653193072765796352