I don’t make excuses. I just ‘science’ everything down to first principles, and

I don’t make excuses. I just ‘science’ everything down to first principles, and describe it as physics of the physical world, or the equivalent of physics in the behavioral world: reciprocal economic terms, and the physics of the evolutionary word: consequences.

I don’t have a simplistic view of much of anything. What I have is a scientific understanding of nearly everything. Because operational logic, physics economics and evolution aren’t opinions. The problem I’ve faced is that writing all of that content is a vast project, but any casual perusal of any part of the work that is in draft form is as unassailable as geometry.

That isn’t to say that people don’t need ‘feels’, and myths, and religions, for cooperation and mindfulness, because they are largely unfit for the world as it is – but it does allow me to judge (that’s my job) true/false, possible/not, ethical/not, moral/not, right/wrong, good/bad, regardless of feels. 😉

No one really wants the truth except to stop some group of liars, cheaters, and thieves from lying cheating and stealing, while permitting themselves to continue lying, cheating, stealing. 😉

Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212 @ToddNQuick1