He who breeds most and fastest inherits the earth. It has nothing to do with character or merit. Hence why we’d all die of cancer eventually. That which breeds wins always no matter what the consequence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-21 21:59:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976579053246435330
Nope. He who breeds most and fastest inherits the earth. It has nothing to do with character or merit. Hence why we’d all die of cancer eventually. That which breeds wins always no matter what the consequence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-21 21:59:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976579009613127680
Reply addressees: @KalishJantzen @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976506530781679616
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976506530781679616
Infinity nor infinities exist or can exist, so there is no opportunity to have it both ways. Fantasies assist us in understanding but they do not ever come into existence such that we can make deductions of possibility from their existence.
This particular fallacy, which does not have a name that I know of, is the basis of the other half of philosophical sophisms. (the first half of philosophical sophisms are made possible by incomplete sentences and incomplete grammar. Otherwise they could not be said.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-21 08:53:00 UTC
Via-Negativa in Everything: Of all the genetic markers we have identified in the production of intelligence, nearly all of them are inhibitory.The problems we face are eliminating error: ignorance, error, bias, suggestion and deceit. This is the intellectual shift I’m advancing..
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 13:14:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975722057458647040
5 – In all things, Mises was only half right, which is the problem we fall into whenever we cherry pick what we measure. Hayek started with cognition, and worked through economics, and finally understood behavioral capital was created by TORT LAW, and all else was a consequence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 00:06:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974799032559325185
Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765006825832449
IN REPLY TO:
@FriedrichHayek
I’m rather shocked at how many fundamental mistakes @BobMurphyEcon makes in this article on Hayek, knowledge, Mises, and calculation. Stunned actually. https://t.co/rn3JZED9pi
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974765006825832449
THE FREQUENCY OF DISASTERS
The causal relation between disasters and frequency is population density to lower the cost of infrastructure so that taxes can be directed to the bureaucracy’s payroll and pensions (really, thats the reason).
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 20:50:00 UTC
So mathematics is very simple. It’s consists of the use of positional names to create general rules of arbitrary precision using some number of dimensions of causality. In other words, it’s the discipline of measurement. It is highly successful in constant relations and less …
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 17:45:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973978477593616385
Reply addressees: @ProfessorLarp @GolfNorman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973978119488057346
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ProfessorLarp @GolfNorman with lie groups as the next primitive category (referent), and repeat the entire process all over again. Which is how we categorize subatomic(wave), particle(object), chemistry, biology, sentience. or physics engineering, programming, language. The same hierarchical process.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973978119488057346
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ProfessorLarp @GolfNorman with lie groups as the next primitive category (referent), and repeat the entire process all over again. Which is how we categorize subatomic(wave), particle(object), chemistry, biology, sentience. or physics engineering, programming, language. The same hierarchical process.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973978119488057346
with lie groups as the next primitive category (referent), and repeat the entire process all over again. Which is how we categorize subatomic(wave), particle(object), chemistry, biology, sentience. or physics engineering, programming, language. The same hierarchical process.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 17:44:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973978119488057346
Reply addressees: @ProfessorLarp @GolfNorman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973977570155917312
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ProfessorLarp @GolfNorman and create time. We can add another dimension and create competition (forces). We can add n-dimensions and create causalities (algebraic geometry). We can add obseve the consequences of the externalities produced by algebraic patterns (lie groups), and then repeat the cycle…
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973977570155917312
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ProfessorLarp @GolfNorman and create time. We can add another dimension and create competition (forces). We can add n-dimensions and create causalities (algebraic geometry). We can add obseve the consequences of the externalities produced by algebraic patterns (lie groups), and then repeat the cycle…
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973977570155917312