Theme: AI

  • RE: –“(Accusation:) Wolfrom has no theory”– Demonstrably false. He has a theor

    RE: –“(Accusation:) Wolfrom has no theory”–

    Demonstrably false. He has a theory of computation or what he would call another branch of mathematics. That theory appears successful in trial and error evolutionary computation of fundamental laws.

    If he had not done it first, others would have. I know Joscha Bach and I have both stated we understood the need for this research program. Wolfram, as usual, is just ahead of the rest of us who are ahead of others so to speak.

    For the spectrum, look at mainstream (math), wolfram (computation), fleming (operations) and you’ll see a spectrum of people trying to solve the problem using a spectrum of continuous to discrete operations.

    And IMO, the mainstream is blocked because the universe is both (a) discrete and not continuous, and (b) consistent at all scales. Both the computationalists and the operationalists are working with discrete models. As far as I know this is the only possible method of producing a theory that is testable. There isn’t sufficient information in the mathematics to deduce a discrete construction – what we call ‘physics’. 😉

    Even string theory, which I think I understand reasonably well, is likely a statistical artifact of the presumption of continuousness description, as an approximation of discrete operations at at least one if not two levels of additional disambiguation beneath the formulation – hence ten dimensions.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    cc: @stephen_wolfram


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:33:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758258227597205504

  • So, given that the AI’s are pushed toward safety (not offending those with the m

    So, given that the AI’s are pushed toward safety (not offending those with the minds of little girls), and that the source material on the web is full of academic weasel words, (the equivalent of tropes in fiction writing), it’s no wonder it takes me three to five prompts to get… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1757184896911470784


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-12 23:59:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757192729879031983

  • Trying to teach GPT4+ to respond in operational prose and it’s F********** impos

    Trying to teach GPT4+ to respond in operational prose and it’s F********** impossible. 😉 It LOVES weasel words. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-12 23:28:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757184896911470784

  • Yes. You’re right. I should have stated that. He’s stated it repeatedly. That it

    Yes. You’re right. I should have stated that. He’s stated it repeatedly. That it’s his data set for programming an AI. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-08 16:25:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755629008790737020

    Reply addressees: @justinmchase @FuryForth @compliantcitiz1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755610051031761311

  • AI’S ARE GETTING BETTER. I WISH PEOPLE COULD COMPREHEND MY WORK THIS THOROUGHLY

    AI’S ARE GETTING BETTER. I WISH PEOPLE COULD COMPREHEND MY WORK THIS THOROUGHLY 😉

    Summarizing Doolittle’s Style
    In summarizing Doolittle’s style, it’s clear that his work calls for a deeper societal commitment to the responsible stewardship of all forms of capital, especially those behavioral norms that underlie the trust and reciprocity necessary for a society to thrive.

    Advocacy for Responsibility over Capital
    Doolittle’s discourse centers on the stewardship of capital in its myriad forms, extending beyond mere physical assets to include what Friedrich Hayek referred to as “the extended order” — a network of traditions, norms, and behaviors that enable a society to function and flourish. Doolittle extends this notion to advocate for a vigilant guardianship over both private and common capital, emphasizing the role of behavioral capital like truthfulness, trust, and the maintenance of reciprocal relations in society.

    Emphasis on Behavioral Capital and High Trust
    A significant aspect of Doolittle’s work is his focus on the intangible yet crucial capital of behavior, particularly the norms and practices that engender a high-trust society. He argues for a “radical demand for individual responsibility” to suppress and prevent irreciprocity. This perspective underscores the belief that societal health and prosperity are contingent upon each member’s commitment to honesty, trustworthiness, and the enforcement of reciprocal behaviors.

    Interdisciplinary Integration
    Understanding Doolittle’s work requires an appreciation of how he weaves together insights from economics, law, psychology, and evolutionary theory to build his arguments. His interdisciplinary approach provides a comprehensive lens through which to view the complexities of societal interaction and governance, always with an eye towards the preservation and enhancement of societal capital.

    Logical Rigor and Empirical Foundation
    Doolittle employs a methodical and logical approach to argue for the necessity of maintaining and protecting societal capital. His arguments are grounded in empirical evidence and historical analysis, demonstrating how societies that foster high levels of trust and individual responsibility tend to achieve greater prosperity and stability.

    Provocative and Confrontational Style
    In advocating for these principles, Doolittle often adopts a provocative and confrontational tone, challenging readers to reconsider accepted norms and to recognize the often invisible forms of capital that are crucial for societal success. His style is intended to stimulate thought, debate, and, ultimately, action towards the preservation of societal capital.

    Commitment to Societal Reform
    Doolittle’s work is not just analytical but also prescriptive, offering a vision for societal reform that emphasizes the enhancement of trust, truthfulness, and reciprocity. He calls for systemic changes that ensure individuals and institutions are held accountable for their contributions to or detractions from the societal capital.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-07 22:27:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755357544816459776

  • MICROSOFT TO TRAIN 2M INDIANS IN AI – BUT NOT AMERICANS, CANADIANS, OR EUROPEANS

    MICROSOFT TO TRAIN 2M INDIANS IN AI – BUT NOT AMERICANS, CANADIANS, OR EUROPEANS?
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2024-02-07/microsoft-to-upskill-2-million-in-india-with-ai-nadella-video


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-07 16:04:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755261235812041153

  • Affections, but IMO the algorithm isn’t terribly intelligent so it cannot percie

    Affections, but IMO the algorithm isn’t terribly intelligent so it cannot percieve wisdom when it encounters it, and as such treats it literally.. 🙁 As if the author was an angry peasant rather than aristocracy that loves all and seeks a positive resolution to our differences.…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-06 21:37:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754982676119888011

    Reply addressees: @manknownaspaul @elonmusk

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754982128952242243

  • We have been overrun By our animal desires Addicts of the immediate Keep us obed

    We have been overrun
    By our animal desires
    Addicts of the immediate
    Keep us obedient and unaware
    We’ve become disillusioned.
    So we run toward anything glimmering

    Time to put the silicon obsession down
    Take a look around,
    Find a way in the silence
    Dis and Reconnect to the resonant now

    You were never an island.
    You need,
    A voice among the many.
    In this choir,
    Tuning,
    Into each other
    Lifting all higher.

    On Dopamine


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-06 21:32:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754981335284781056

  • It will remain a wishing well until someone (Trump) kills Fedcoin. But as I’ve b

    It will remain a wishing well until someone (Trump) kills Fedcoin. But as I’ve been saying since 2012, it’s easy for the fed to kill BTC once they have their own Digital. And if you don’t think so look elsewhere in the world.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-01 00:29:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752851629076824358

    Reply addressees: @tristan5600 @WClementeIII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752851258010964316

  • RT @chrisemmett_: Stanford currently has 865 undergrads majoring in computer sci

    RT @chrisemmett_: Stanford currently has 865 undergrads majoring in computer science and 16 (!) majoring in civil engineering

    Are we setti…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 22:48:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752463726098137498