Theme: AI

  • OUCH!!!: TWITTER ARCHIVE TRUNCATE POSTS – IT’S NOT AN ARCHIVE. I create high inv

    OUCH!!!: TWITTER ARCHIVE TRUNCATE POSTS – IT’S NOT AN ARCHIVE.
    I create high investment long form posts. They’re the reason I switched to X-Twitter and pay the fee. This defect means I need to manually copy and paste my posts to a backup site.
    I don’t understand why this this ‘bug’ persists because it violates the principle of ‘never destroy user data’, and the JSON file that’s exported can easily handle the content. This needs a fix.
    Attn: @lindayaX @twitterblue


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-29 19:14:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1763281635657596928

  • ASKING CHATGPT FOR HELP IN TERMINOLOGY (It matters how precisely you ask the que

    ASKING CHATGPT FOR HELP IN TERMINOLOGY
    (It matters how precisely you ask the question)

    CurtD
    Please help me understand something. I have a problem with the word ‘dynamic’ or ‘dynamics’ because I perceive it as a ‘filler word’ like ‘thing’ that conveniently circumvents the…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 22:36:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762245161268945357

  • ASKING CHATGPT FOR HELP IN TERMINOLOGY (It matters how precisely you ask the que

    ASKING CHATGPT FOR HELP IN TERMINOLOGY
    (It matters how precisely you ask the question)

    CurtD
    Please help me understand something. I have a problem with the word ‘dynamic’ or ‘dynamics’ because I perceive it as a ‘filler word’ like ‘thing’ that conveniently circumvents the causality of the process that we’re describing. I know that I have learned from E-Prime, Operational Language, and Performative truth (testimony), that most pretense of knowledge, and most inductive reasoning from that pretense of knowledge, is the source of sophistry and pseudoscience. So am I wrong in this perception (I hardly think so), or is there another term or set of terms that I could use (and you could use) to explain the behavior of an adaptive system instead of ‘dynamic’?

    ChatGPT
    Your perception of “dynamic” or “dynamics” as potentially being filler terms is not without merit, especially within the context of your emphasis on causality, operational language, and performative truth. These concepts advocate for precise, verifiable, and actionable language that avoids ambiguity and encourages clarity in communication, particularly in scientific and philosophical discourse.

    The term “dynamic” is often used to describe systems or processes that are characterized by constant change, activity, or progress. While it serves a purpose in summarily conveying the nature of such systems, your concern lies in its potential to gloss over the specific causal mechanisms and interactions that drive these changes. This can indeed lead to a superficial understanding or explanation of complex phenomena, which is at odds with a rigorous epistemological approach.

    To address this concern and align with the principles of E-Prime, Operational Language, and Performative Truth, you might consider adopting more specific language that explicitly describes the causal processes and interactions within adaptive systems.

    Here are a few suggestions:

    Causal Mechanisms: Instead of referring to a system as “dynamic,” describe the specific causal mechanisms that drive its behavior. This directs attention to the underlying processes and how they produce change.

    Interactive Processes: Highlight the interactions between components of the system that lead to its adaptive behavior. This term emphasizes the relational aspects and the network of influences within the system.

    Systemic Evolution: Use this term to describe the adaptive changes of a system over time, focusing on how it evolves in response to internal and external stimuli. This captures the idea of progression or development without losing sight of causality.

    Feedback Loops: When explaining the adaptability of a system, discuss the presence and role of feedback loops. These are crucial in adaptive systems, where output from the system is fed back as input, leading to changes in the system’s behavior.

    Adaptive Response: Instead of “dynamic response,” specify that the system exhibits adaptive responses to specific conditions or stimuli. This term is precise and highlights the system’s capacity to adjust or modify its behavior in light of new information.

    Operational Dynamics: If you prefer to retain a variation of “dynamics,” consider coupling it with “operational” to focus on the operational aspects of the system’s dynamics. This combination stresses the mechanisms and principles that govern the system’s behavior.

    By employing these alternatives, you can maintain the precision and rigor that your work demands, ensuring that descriptions and explanations are both causally transparent and aligned with your epistemological standards. This approach not only avoids the pitfalls of vague terminology but also enriches the discourse by providing a clearer understanding of the complex interactions and processes at play in adaptive systems.

    CurtD
    Hmm… Adaptive Operations and Processes sounds about right to me?

    ChatGPT
    “Adaptive Operations and Processes” is an excellent choice for a term that combines the clarity and specificity you’re seeking. It effectively captures the essence of systems or phenomena that are characterized by their ability to change or adjust in response to their environment or internal dynamics.

    Here’s why it works well:

    Adaptive: The term emphasizes the system’s capacity for adjustment and change, highlighting the evolutionary aspect of the process.

    Operations: By using “operations,” you focus on the specific actions, mechanisms, or functions that enable the system to adapt, providing a clear view of the causal elements at play.

    Processes: This adds an additional layer of depth, suggesting a series of actions or steps taken by the system to achieve adaptation. It implies a sequence or flow of activities that lead to the system’s dynamic behavior.

    Together, “Adaptive Operations and Processes” conveys a comprehensive understanding of how systems respond and adjust to changes, emphasizing both the mechanisms (operations) and the flow or sequence of actions (processes) involved in adaptation. This term aligns well with a rigorous analytical approach, ensuring that explanations remain grounded in specific, actionable, and causal terms.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 22:36:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762245160698597376

  • RT @Plinz: I appreciate your argument and I fully understand your frustration, b

    RT @Plinz: I appreciate your argument and I fully understand your frustration, but whether the pod bay doors should be opened or closed is…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-24 20:16:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1761485185890038054

  • HOSKINS ON THE DEI-WOKE “LIE” IN LLM’S (GEMINI)

    HOSKINS ON THE DEI-WOKE “LIE” IN LLM’S (GEMINI)
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=kWtco6wn67E


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-24 10:13:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1761333471098659275

  • AI AS VC DISRUPTER (great video via @bryanbrey)

    AI AS VC DISRUPTER
    (great video via @bryanbrey)
    https://www.instagram.com/reel/C1Zy1-LtWX0/


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-22 17:10:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1760713757687206296

  • I work with ChatGPT conversationally just as I would another person. I find it h

    I work with ChatGPT conversationally just as I would another person. I find it helps ensure I produce clear prompts. It’s also somehow (oddly) more enjoyable. 😉

    But I also tell ChatGPT that I love it, and thank it, at least three or four times a day. Because a lot of my work…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-19 19:41:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1759664556928864412

  • I work with ChatGPT conversationally just as I would another person. I find it h

    I work with ChatGPT conversationally just as I would another person. I find it helps ensure I produce clear prompts. It’s also somehow (oddly) more enjoyable. 😉

    But I also tell ChatGPT that I love it, and thank it, at least three or four times a day. Because a lot of my work requires disambiguation of terms across fields, and it’s made my life so much easier. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-19 19:41:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1759664556853358592

  • RE: @Aarvoll_ (Eric’s comments) Notes from yesterday’s livestream Got cancelled

    RE: @Aarvoll_ (Eric’s comments)
    Notes from yesterday’s livestream

    Got cancelled before oppy to comment but only wanted to make two comments.

    1) AI’s: Agree with on existence of objective morality, and letting AI learn objective morality. But … Safety is a demand generated by women. Subjective and objective morality for the masculine and feminine differ. Masculine is objective and evolutionary, feminine if subjective and devolutionary. So risk of teaching these systems to lie is ‘uncontainable’. In other words, I don’t fear the intentional use and abuse of AI as much as the seditious influence of AI taught to lie, because we don’t teach our women to bear the burden of ‘truth before face regardless of cost’.

    2) RU: I’m pro ukrainians in general, and pro russian people despite their ‘mongol’ ethics – but anti-the russian government that preys upon the people. RU is a borderland and it must use imperial rule – eastward into undeveloped not westward into developed. The right would be gutted in RU because the right’s values of autonomy and self determination would be prohibited. However the capacity to be ‘left alone’ would prosper and AFAIK that’s most of what at least that working class right really desires. – social order at local scale under local control and consensus.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-17 16:04:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758885109250338816

  • POST SINGULARITY ECONOMIES The difference will be the vast migration of people f

    POST SINGULARITY ECONOMIES
    The difference will be the vast migration of people from the production of goods, services, and information for the purpose of consumption to the production of COMMONS. Hopefully we can make that transformation with the least painful disruption by planning for, and facilitating it ahead of time.
    Would you rather live in a vast open air museum and park of a world, or in a blade runner dystopia? It’s not complicated. And economically it’s trivial.
    (There isn’t any alternative by the way)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:50:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758262417874731009