META’S LLAMA3 VS COPILOT(BING) ON MY WORK
Meta’s LLama3 is reasonably accurate describing some aspects of my work at an abstract level. While Bing’s Copilot hits the nail on the head.
Interesting from Llama3:
Testimonial truth, as developed by Curt Doolittle, refers to the idea that truth is determined by the consistency of testimony across individuals, rather than by reference to an objective reality or authority. The properties of testimonial truth include:
Decentralized: Truth is determined by the collective testimony of individuals, rather than by a central authority.
Consensus-based: Truth is established by the consistency of testimony across individuals, rather than by a single individual or group.
Falsifiable: Testimony can be challenged and potentially disproven by counter-testimony.
Empirical: Truth is grounded in experience and observation, rather than abstract reasoning or authority.
Provisional: Truth is considered provisional, subject to revision or refinement as new testimony emerges.
Polycentric: Truth can be determined by multiple, independent sources, rather than a single, centralized authority.
Adversarial: Truth is established through the adversarial process of challenging and defending testimony.
These properties aim to provide a framework for determining truth that is resilient to manipulation, coercion, and error, and that can adapt to new information and perspectives.
BUT ON dimensions it fails completely. It’s not even worth posting here.
While Bing’s Copilot Is peffect (Possibly best):
Curt Doolittle, a prominent thinker, has delved into the concept of truth and its dimensions. Let’s explore some of these dimensions:
Tautological Truth: This type of truth arises when we promise the equality of two statements using different terms. Essentially, it’s a circular definition or a statement of equality or identity12.
Performative Truth (Testimony): This form of truth requires coherence across dimensions that are testifiable by humans. These dimensions include:
Realism: Consistency with reality.
Naturalism: Alignment with natural phenomena.
Identity: Adherence to the identity of the subject.
Logical: Conformity to logical principles.
Operational: Practical applicability.
Rational: Reasonable and coherent.
Reciprocal: Mutual consistency.
Empirical: Based on observable evidence.
Within Stated Limits: Valid within specified boundaries.
Fully Accounted Within Those Limits: No missing factors.
Reversible (Restitutable): Can be undone or restored.
Within Your Ability To…: Feasible within your capacity1.
These dimensions provide a framework for evaluating truth claims, ensuring due diligence, and assessing the reliability of statements. Keep in mind that truth is multifaceted, and understanding its various dimensions enriches our pursuit of knowledge.
Learn more
📷https://t.co/Y3nTrjvCG2📷https://t.co/Y3nTrjvCG2📷https://t.co/Y3nTrjvCG2