Theme: AI

  • PREDICTION: WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE COMMERCIAL DRONE REVOLUTION? They are extrem

    PREDICTION: WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE COMMERCIAL DRONE REVOLUTION?

    They are extremely vulnerable, and the culmination of “Cargo Cult” opportunism.

    It will take a while for their density to be such that it’s worth making a living off investment with capturing their cargo, but you know, I sure as heck know how to make a living at it, and a gang that gets organized enough will make a great living at it.

    I mean, you know that video from south africa where the locals cut up a beached whale while it’s still living, and run off with hunks of meat?

    A distribution channel of drones carrying ‘Cargo’ is simply a an opportunity for many generations of the division of labor more evolved than whale meat.

    Drones fly at 120 meters (130 yards) according to FAA regulations.

    Now if you’ve shot skeet, you can shoot down a done with 3 1/2” 12 gauge OOO Buckshot, with a drop of 18″. If you lead, and fire three shots in sequence assuming 18″ drop it’s shooting fish in a barrel. (and yes the gang bangers will develop ‘talent’ that will do it, and vehicles to do it from, and spend all f’king day doing it. You can use a rifled shotgun and slug pretty easily at 130 yards. Even with a .22 semi auto – because it’s so quiet and can put a lot of rounds up there. Or with another drone you can just tie nails to a bit of fishing net and drop it on the drone, or just smack into it with your landing gear.

    Now that’s before we get to the fact that they are even more vulnerable during delivery of the goods. And that even if their reasonably autonomous they aren’t endlessly autonomous. And that capturing, modifying, and using them for ‘other purposes’ is profitable in and of itself.

    So now, you get your own and deliver drugs anonymously and don’t need runners.

    I mean, the disintermediation from the human being is awesome. And you know, load it up with explosives and now people won’t interfere with it. I mean.. it’s a whole new criminal industry just waiting to happen! 😉

    Sorry. Just had to rain on the parade.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 16:58:00 UTC

  • Россию. (Congratulations Russia) I have to add that to our mission statement. Cu

    https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2019/10/russia-will-test-its-ability-disconnect-internet/160861/Поздравляю Россию.

    (Congratulations Russia)

    I have to add that to our mission statement.

    Cut off Anglo Civilization from the rest of the world. 😉

    https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2019/10/russia-will-test-its-ability-disconnect-internet/160861/Updated Oct 24, 2019, 9:27 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 21:27:00 UTC

  • True. (a) we don’t think of programming as an invention over the logics, that br

    True. (a) we don’t think of programming as an invention over the logics, that bridges the gap between empiricism and logic(words) and math(measures). It is. (b) programming and database work are intolerant and teach you to think using these terms. ….


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 00:39:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186804404994875393

    Reply addressees: @QuestionMThings

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186657424423505921


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186657424423505921

  • “ROBOT JUDGES” (from elsewhere) I have worked on automating legal argument since

    “ROBOT JUDGES”
    (from elsewhere)

    I have worked on automating legal argument since we wrote ipx drivers by hand, and was certainly one of the first people to do it for every federal court. I… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=488343851762510&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 01:54:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185735930537267200

  • “ROBOT JUDGES” (from elsewhere) I have worked on automating legal argument since

    “ROBOT JUDGES”

    (from elsewhere)

    I have worked on automating legal argument since we wrote ipx drivers by hand, and was certainly one of the first people to do it for every federal court. I currently work on the strict construction of law from the test of reciprocity, and the tests of whether one is given truthful testimony. Most cases are settled before trial because they are decidable, and those that make it to trial not easily decided without subjective testing of incentives, and the vast majority of legal cases are decided by whether we subjectively test the believability of the individuals at hand – (and some by oversaturating the reason of the jury). If AI justice is at all possible we are very, very, very far from it. And even so, I don’t think we would permit it. We might permit a machine to produce information FOR a jury. But if we get to the point where we abandon the jury of our peers, it’s time to hoist the jolly roger so to speak.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 21:53:00 UTC

  • “Quote: If FAMGA dropped off the face of the Earth, “Nearly all of your electron

    —“Quote: If FAMGA dropped off the face of the Earth, “Nearly all of your electronic devices would either stop working or would disappear, the internet would become nothing short of mass chaos, nearly all e-commerce activity would halt, and your undying thirst to watch cat videos would forever go unquenched.””—Matt Hulbert

    These companies are protected by a combination of

    1) effectively unlimited access to speculative credit markets;

    2) domestic intellectual property rights;

    3) ability to grind the court process;

    4) unconstitutional (irreciprocal) disintermediation of the public from juridical defense in matters of the commons; 5) unhealthy american habit of inaction on consumer protection;

    6) the slow pace of american legal adaptation to novel monopolies (Oil, Telecom, now internet service providers); 7) And at least, recently concern that such interference cascade would expose the weakness of the economy and its dependence on debt (financialization) and a narrow distribution of tech companies whose assets are being duplicated in china where none of these american ‘issues’ are a problem.

    I’m a conservative libertarian but our lack of consumer protection is criminal – tech is just obvious. Credit is even more criminal. I’ve lived in a very poor country (Ukraine) born costs in many, and there is no reason for most of the absurd costs we pay for what have converted from luxuries to infrastructure.

    Google is the national resource location platform, amazon the national shopping and delivery platform, and Facebook the national communication platform.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 18:29:00 UTC

  • I am not sure but i think this latter measure is what taleb tried to discover an

    I am not sure but i think this latter measure is what taleb tried to discover and failed. My understanding is we will not know it before we develop AI’s with GAI. Hippocampus, Cornu Ammonis, sec. 3 provides our auto association. Thatamic attention focuses association/prediction.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 03:45:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179241071567618048

    Reply addressees: @mizroba @LTF_01

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179239804204126210


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @mizroba @LTF_01 Well, since we produce hypotheses by free association with what we would consider practically infinite causal dimensions it’s partly true. But (a) we can reverse engineer them afterward, and (b) there appears a measurable ‘distance’ of prediction we can begin to identify.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179239804204126210


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @mizroba @LTF_01 Well, since we produce hypotheses by free association with what we would consider practically infinite causal dimensions it’s partly true. But (a) we can reverse engineer them afterward, and (b) there appears a measurable ‘distance’ of prediction we can begin to identify.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179239804204126210

  • I think we should study the brain a bit more – all of us, because it’s computati

    I think we should study the brain a bit more – all of us, because it’s computationally difficult to resist primal impulses when excited by stress. This lovely bundle of nerves across the top of the limbic system, serves largely to inhibit impulsive reactions to types of pain.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 19:20:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179113830456205313

    Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179112844203319298


    IN REPLY TO:

    @FullAccountant

    @curtdoolittle I don’t. My issue with them is when their cognitive bias concludes false/non-conclusive intentions towards others. Curt is a fed. Peterson is consciously gatekeeping and undermining. Jews are all consciously undermining. That isn’t truth, its speculation masquerading as truth.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179112844203319298

  • Yes this is a canon example, and one of the three ‘tests’ that caused the govern

    Yes this is a canon example, and one of the three ‘tests’ that caused the government to pressure providers to harden security on sites. Unfortunately for the government and providers, it’s actually not possible. Deprive the system of electricity – which is easy and nothing works.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 12:58:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177568248981852161

    Reply addressees: @D_Zanzer @OrienPermu

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177477597141159939


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177477597141159939

  • UPDATING ARTHUR C CLARKE *Any sufficiently intelligent individual will be indist

    UPDATING ARTHUR C CLARKE

    *Any sufficiently intelligent individual will be indistinguishable from an artificial intelligence.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 00:57:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175212521621479426