Curt Doolittle

Theme: AI

  • GPT-4 SUMMARIZES MY 14 RULES OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION Prompt: –“Please Summa

    GPT-4 SUMMARIZES MY 14 RULES OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
    Prompt:
    –“Please Summarize [pasted text]”–

    The text provides a series of propositions that relate to the evolutionary computation of natural systems, human cognition, and human social organization. The author suggests that all causality and existence results from the universe’s attempt to decrease dissipation or increase organization, and that causality calculates potential for increasing organization. The text discusses the concepts of stable relations, continuous recursive disambiguation, and sex differences in the division of labor in evolutionary computation. The author argues that human organizational differences evolve from influence, coercion, and power and that human political organizations evolve from these three methods. The text states that the rate of evolutionary computation is determined by the order of founding institutions, and that organizing humans into evolutionary computation is difficult but produces the most commons, with the highest trust, highest risk tolerance, highest economic velocity, highest investment, and fastest innovation, adaptation, and evolution. The text concludes by discussing the success of European civilization, which the author suggests resulted from the maximization of evolutionary computation by maximizing the opportunity for self-determination, reciprocal insurance of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, and markets in all aspects of life.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 15:31:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641825669293174786

  • GPT-4 SUMMARIZES MY 14 RULES OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION Prompt: –“Please Summa

    GPT-4 SUMMARIZES MY 14 RULES OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
    Prompt:
    –“Please Summarize [pasted text]”–

    The text provides a series of propositions that relate to the evolutionary computation of natural systems, human cognition, and human social organization. The author suggests that all causality and existence results from the universe’s attempt to decrease dissipation or increase organization, and that causality calculates potential for increasing organization. The text discusses the concepts of stable relations, continuous recursive disambiguation, and sex differences in the division of labor in evolutionary computation. The author argues that human organizational differences evolve from influence, coercion, and power and that human political organizations evolve from these three methods. The text states that the rate of evolutionary computation is determined by the order of founding institutions, and that organizing humans into evolutionary computation is difficult but produces the most commons, with the highest trust, highest risk tolerance, highest economic velocity, highest investment, and fastest innovation, adaptation, and evolution. The text concludes by discussing the success of European civilization, which the author suggests resulted from the maximization of evolutionary computation by maximizing the opportunity for self-determination, reciprocal insurance of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, and markets in all aspects of life.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 15:31:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641825669159043076

  • Yeah, I think GPT is going to help me get to publication a bit faster. 😉

    Yeah, I think GPT is going to help me get to publication a bit faster. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 15:24:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641823911066185728

    Reply addressees: @DanAnde23836316

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641821539434733568

  • OMG I JUST FELL IN LOVE WITH GPT4. (I asked GPT to summarize a page of my notes

    OMG I JUST FELL IN LOVE WITH GPT4.
    (I asked GPT to summarize a page of my notes outlining the hierarchy of laws of evolutionary computation. I’m kind of floored…)

    –“Can you summarize this document from this url: https://naturallawinstitute.com/docs/the-law/part-xx-conclusion/evolutionary-computation/”–

    The document at the given URL…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 15:04:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641818799732137984

  • OMG I JUST FELL IN LOVE WITH GPT4. (I asked GPT to summarize a page of my notes

    OMG I JUST FELL IN LOVE WITH GPT4.
    (I asked GPT to summarize a page of my notes outlining the hierarchy of laws of evolutionary computation. I’m kind of floored…)

    –“Can you summarize this document from this url: https://t.co/rDd1NWiEQw”–

    The document at the given URL discusses the concept of “Evolutionary Computation” (EC) and its role in developing a comprehensive theory of natural law. The author argues that EC provides a useful framework for understanding the complexity of natural systems and for developing models that can accurately predict their behavior. The document provides an overview of the principles of EC and discusses its applications in various fields, such as biology, engineering, and artificial intelligence. The author suggests that EC can be used to model and understand the principles of natural law, and that it provides a basis for developing ethical and moral principles that are grounded in the natural world. The document concludes by emphasizing the importance of EC in understanding the fundamental principles of natural law and developing a comprehensive theory of ethics and morality.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 15:04:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641818799547588608

  • MORE –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define the firs

    MORE
    –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define the first principle of the universe?”–

    (GPT provides the wrong answer. It replies that (a) I don’t state one and (b) instead reiterates (though correctly) the emphasis on existence (realism, naturalism), operationalism, and the scientific method.)

    So I asked again with a more specific prompt, and it even states that this is a more recent addition to my work:

    –“I thought Doolittle posited that the first principle of the universe was “Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation”. Am I wrong?”–

    I apologize for the confusion. You are correct that Curt Doolittle has discussed the concept of “Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation” as a possible first principle of the universe, particularly in his more recent work on the topic.

    According to Doolittle, Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation (CREC) is a fundamental process that occurs in the universe at all levels of complexity, from subatomic particles to biological organisms to social systems. CREC involves the continuous recursive application of simple computational operations, which generate increasingly complex forms of computation over time.

    Doolittle suggests that CREC is the foundation of all complexity in the universe, and that it provides a basis for understanding a wide range of phenomena, from the behavior of subatomic particles to the emergence of complex social institutions. He argues that understanding the principles of CREC is essential for developing a comprehensive theory of reality that can account for both physical and social phenomena.

    Overall, Doolittle’s concept of Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation can be seen as a possible first principle of the universe, which emphasizes the importance of computational processes and the continuous evolution of complexity over time.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:55:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641816432194224128

  • MORE –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define the firs

    MORE
    –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define the first principle of the universe?”–

    (GPT provides the wrong answer. It replies that (a) I don’t state one and (b) instead reiterates (though correctly) the emphasis on existence (realism, naturalism), operationalism, and the scientific method.)

    So I asked again with a more specific prompt, and it even states that this is a more recent addition to my work:

    –“I thought Doolittle posited that the first principle of the universe was “Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation”. Am I wrong?”–

    I apologize for the confusion. You are correct that Curt Doolittle has discussed the concept of “Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation” as a possible first principle of the universe, particularly in his more recent work on the topic.

    According to Doolittle, Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation (CREC) is a fundamental process that occurs in the universe at all levels of complexity, from subatomic particles to biological organisms to social systems. CREC involves the continuous recursive application of simple computational operations, which generate increasingly complex forms of computation over time.

    Doolittle suggests that CREC is the foundation of all complexity in the universe, and that it provides a basis for understanding a wide range of phenomena, from the behavior of subatomic particles to the emergence of complex social institutions. He argues that understanding the principles of CREC is essential for developing a comprehensive theory of reality that can account for both physical and social phenomena.

    Overall, Doolittle’s concept of Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation can be seen as a possible first principle of the universe, which emphasizes the importance of computational processes and the continuous evolution of complexity over time.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:55:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641816432034951171

  • FASCINATING: GPT SUMMARIZES MY WORK ON TRUTH DIFFERENTLY. (This response isn’t q

    FASCINATING: GPT SUMMARIZES MY WORK ON TRUTH DIFFERENTLY.
    (This response isn’t quite right, because it conflates the truth hierarchy with the dimensions of testing the truth of a statement. And is missing elements of both the definition and the test. So it’s ‘summarizing’ about like a high school or college student might – when in fact it’s engaging in an error of conflation. But you’ve got to admit it ‘understands’ better than 99% of the people who read my work. 😉 )

    –“Philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle defines truth as a spectrum from honesty to tautology. Can you list the types of truth he defines in that spectrum?”–

    Yes, Curt Doolittle’s theory of truth includes a spectrum that ranges from honesty to tautology. Along this spectrum, he identifies several different types of truth:

    Honesty: According to Doolittle, honesty is the most basic form of truth, and it involves accurately reporting what one has observed or experienced. Honesty is essential for building trust and cooperation in social groups.

    Correspondence: Correspondence truth is the degree to which a statement or belief accurately corresponds to reality. This type of truth is based on empirical evidence and is essential for making accurate predictions about the world.

    Operational: Operational truth is the degree to which a statement or belief can be verified or falsified through physical operations or tests. This type of truth is closely related to the concept of decidability, which involves the ability to determine whether a statement or belief is true or false through a physical operation or test.

    Coherence: Coherence truth is the degree to which a set of beliefs or statements fit together in a coherent and logical way. This type of truth is important for constructing internally consistent and logically valid systems of thought.

    Existential: Existential truth is the degree to which a statement or belief reflects the fundamental nature of existence. This type of truth is closely related to metaphysical and ontological questions, and it is often debated in philosophical and religious contexts.

    Tautological: Tautological truth is the degree to which a statement or belief is true by definition or by virtue of the meaning of its terms. This type of truth is often criticized for being circular or uninformative, as it does not provide any new information beyond what is already contained in the statement or belief.

    Overall, Doolittle’s spectrum of truth highlights the different ways in which truth can be defined and understood, ranging from basic honesty to more complex concepts related to correspondence, coherence, and existential questions.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:47:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641814591138045952

  • FASCINATING: GPT SUMMARIZES MY WORK ON TRUTH DIFFERENTLY. (This response isn’t q

    FASCINATING: GPT SUMMARIZES MY WORK ON TRUTH DIFFERENTLY.
    (This response isn’t quite right, because it conflates the truth hierarchy with the dimensions of testing the truth of a statement. And is missing elements of both the definition and the test. So it’s ‘summarizing’ about like a high school or college student might – when in fact it’s engaging in an error of conflation. But you’ve got to admit it ‘understands’ better than 99% of the people who read my work. 😉 )

    –“Philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle defines truth as a spectrum from honesty to tautology. Can you list the types of truth he defines in that spectrum?”–

    Yes, Curt Doolittle’s theory of truth includes a spectrum that ranges from honesty to tautology. Along this spectrum, he identifies several different types of truth:

    Honesty: According to Doolittle, honesty is the most basic form of truth, and it involves accurately reporting what one has observed or experienced. Honesty is essential for building trust and cooperation in social groups.

    Correspondence: Correspondence truth is the degree to which a statement or belief accurately corresponds to reality. This type of truth is based on empirical evidence and is essential for making accurate predictions about the world.

    Operational: Operational truth is the degree to which a statement or belief can be verified or falsified through physical operations or tests. This type of truth is closely related to the concept of decidability, which involves the ability to determine whether a statement or belief is true or false through a physical operation or test.

    Coherence: Coherence truth is the degree to which a set of beliefs or statements fit together in a coherent and logical way. This type of truth is important for constructing internally consistent and logically valid systems of thought.

    Existential: Existential truth is the degree to which a statement or belief reflects the fundamental nature of existence. This type of truth is closely related to metaphysical and ontological questions, and it is often debated in philosophical and religious contexts.

    Tautological: Tautological truth is the degree to which a statement or belief is true by definition or by virtue of the meaning of its terms. This type of truth is often criticized for being circular or uninformative, as it does not provide any new information beyond what is already contained in the statement or belief.

    Overall, Doolittle’s spectrum of truth highlights the different ways in which truth can be defined and understood, ranging from basic honesty to more complex concepts related to correspondence, coherence, and existential questions.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:47:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641814590915739650

  • SERIOUSLY GPT4 CAN EXPLAIN MY WORK… AND IT”S CORRECT. … FASCINATING –“How d

    SERIOUSLY GPT4 CAN EXPLAIN MY WORK… AND IT”S CORRECT. … FASCINATING

    –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define decidabilty?”–

    Curt Doolittle, the philosopher and social scientist who developed the theory of Propertarianism, uses the concept of “operationalism” to define decidability. According to Doolittle, operationalism is the principle that concepts and propositions should be defined in terms of the physical operations that can be used to verify or falsify them.

    In this context, decidability can be understood as the ability to determine whether a proposition or statement is true or false through a physical operation or test. Doolittle emphasizes that operational definitions are essential for achieving clarity and rigor in scientific and philosophical discourse, and that they allow for the development of empirical and testable theories.

    In the context of Propertarianism, decidability is closely related to the concept of “testimonialism,” which is the idea that knowledge can be obtained through testimony and can be verified through empirical tests. Doolittle argues that the ability to verify claims through empirical tests is essential for achieving objective knowledge and for overcoming biases and errors in human reasoning.

    Overall, Doolittle’s theory of operationalism and testimonialism provides a framework for defining decidability in terms of physical operations and empirical tests, which can be used to verify or falsify claims about the world.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:40:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641812809624240129