Theme: AI

  • @Aakash: AFAICT the problem with the algorithm is that it can’t judge and weigh

    @Aakash:
    AFAICT the problem with the algorithm is that it can’t judge and weigh the content itself. It’s still depending on audience reaction. And it’s limiting the audience to your network.

    I’d like to downweight low quality content, paraticularly content that violated decorum (easy). But I’d also like do downweight content that relied on undermining vs argumentation or persuasion (a bit harder, but possible).

    Reply addressees: @aakashg0


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-02 14:56:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642541620200439808

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641976869460275201

  • @Aakash: AFAICT the problem with the algorithm is that it can’t judge and weigh

    @Aakash:
    AFAICT the problem with the algorithm is that it can’t judge and weigh the content itself. It’s still depending on audience reaction. And it’s limiting the audience to your network.

    I’d like to downweight low quality content, paraticularly content that violated decorum (easy). But I’d also like do downweight content that relied on undermining vs argumentation or persuasion (a bit harder, but possible).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-02 14:56:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642541620317810688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641976869460275201

  • RT @aakashg0: 4. Mutes & unfollows hurt All of the following hurt your engagemen

    RT @aakashg0: 4. Mutes & unfollows hurt

    All of the following hurt your engagement:

    • Mutes
    • Blocks
    • Unfollows
    • Spam reports
    • Abuse re…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-02 14:47:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642539302427959299

  • TWITTER ALGORITHM RULES (via @ScottAdamsSays) Likes(30x) are more influential th

    TWITTER ALGORITHM RULES
    (via @ScottAdamsSays)
    Likes(30x) are more influential than retweets (20x).
    Images get a (2x) boost.
    Mention something that’s trending, boost. (+?x)
    More than 1 hashtag you get no boost at all. (0x)
    External links are deboosted. (-?x)
    Verified Users get a…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-02 01:09:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642333407161073664

  • TWITTER ALGORITHM RULES (via @ScottAdamsSays) Likes(30x) are more influential th

    TWITTER ALGORITHM RULES
    (via @ScottAdamsSays)
    Likes(30x) are more influential than retweets (20x).
    Images get a (2x) boost.
    Mention something that’s trending, boost. (+?x)
    More than 1 hashtag you get no boost at all. (0x)
    External links are deboosted. (-?x)
    Verified Users get a boost (+?x)
    Demoted if there is no text (-?x)
    URL Only Tweets are deboosted (-?x)
    Non News Item, Non Media (-?x)
    Your Reputation – Your repubation is harmed by responding to low quality accounts (trolls, etc) (-?x) meaning you should not engage with low quality people who most need ‘correction’. (Small and controversial accounts).
    There are Blacklisted Topics (-?x) but they aren’t public.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-02 01:09:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642333407031054337

  • CHAT GPT ON MACDONALD, DUCHESNE, DOOLITTLE (Added Ricardo to the list. Not reall

    CHAT GPT ON MACDONALD, DUCHESNE, DOOLITTLE (Added Ricardo to the list. Not really seeing any insight here. Just enumeration. It’s not wrong but it’s also just a set of ‘encyclopedia’ entries.)

    Curt Doolittle, Kevin MacDonald, and Ricardo Duchesne are all influential figures in their respective fields, but their work differs in terms of focus, scope, and objectives. Here is a brief overview of their work and the differences between them:

    Curt Doolittle:
    Doolittle is an American philosopher and social scientist who developed Propertarianism, a political philosophy emphasizing property rights, rule of law, and reciprocity as essential components of social cooperation and stability. His work aims to create a framework for understanding human behavior, social systems, and governance, with the goal of promoting cooperation, trust, and prosperity. Doolittle’s ideas revolve around the importance of demonstrated interests, property rights, and the enforcement of reciprocity in human societies.

    Kevin MacDonald:
    MacDonald is an American psychologist and intellectual historian known for his controversial work on group evolutionary strategies, particularly in relation to Jewish culture and history. He has written extensively on the subject, with his most notable work being “The Culture of Critique” series. MacDonald’s work focuses on understanding the evolutionary basis of group behavior and the impact of these behaviors on broader society.

    Ricardo Duchesne:
    Duchesne is a Puerto Rican-born Canadian historical sociologist who has written about the uniqueness of Western civilization and its historical development. His work emphasizes the distinctiveness of European culture and history, arguing that certain cultural traits, such as individualism and a spirit of inquiry, have led to the unparalleled achievements of Western civilization. Duchesne’s work is primarily concerned with understanding the historical factors that have shaped Western societies and their global influence.

    In summary, the main differences between the work of Curt Doolittle, Kevin MacDonald, and Ricardo Duchesne are:

    Focus: Doolittle’s work is centered on political philosophy and social systems, MacDonald’s work focuses on group evolutionary strategies and their impact on society, and Duchesne’s work is concerned with the historical development and distinctiveness of Western civilization.

    Scope: Doolittle’s Propertarianism seeks to provide a general framework for understanding human behavior and social systems, MacDonald’s work is more narrowly focused on the evolutionary basis of specific group behaviors, and Duchesne’s work examines the historical factors that have shaped Western societies and their global influence.

    Objectives: Doolittle aims to develop a political philosophy that fosters cooperation, trust, and prosperity, MacDonald seeks to understand the evolutionary origins and consequences of group behaviors, and Duchesne explores the historical factors that have led to the distinctiveness and achievements of Western civilization.

    It is important to note that all three figures have attracted criticism for their ideas, with some critics arguing that their work is overly reductionist, biased, or potentially harmful.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 18:10:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642227946587815936

  • CHAT GPT ON MACDONALD, DUCHESNE, DOOLITTLE (Added Ricardo to the list. Not reall

    CHAT GPT ON MACDONALD, DUCHESNE, DOOLITTLE (Added Ricardo to the list. Not really seeing any insight here. Just enumeration. It’s not wrong but it’s also just a set of ‘encyclopedia’ entries.)

    Curt Doolittle, Kevin MacDonald, and Ricardo Duchesne are all influential figures in their respective fields, but their work differs in terms of focus, scope, and objectives. Here is a brief overview of their work and the differences between them:

    Curt Doolittle:
    Doolittle is an American philosopher and social scientist who developed Propertarianism, a political philosophy emphasizing property rights, rule of law, and reciprocity as essential components of social cooperation and stability. His work aims to create a framework for understanding human behavior, social systems, and governance, with the goal of promoting cooperation, trust, and prosperity. Doolittle’s ideas revolve around the importance of demonstrated interests, property rights, and the enforcement of reciprocity in human societies.

    Kevin MacDonald:
    MacDonald is an American psychologist and intellectual historian known for his controversial work on group evolutionary strategies, particularly in relation to Jewish culture and history. He has written extensively on the subject, with his most notable work being “The Culture of Critique” series. MacDonald’s work focuses on understanding the evolutionary basis of group behavior and the impact of these behaviors on broader society.

    Ricardo Duchesne:
    Duchesne is a Puerto Rican-born Canadian historical sociologist who has written about the uniqueness of Western civilization and its historical development. His work emphasizes the distinctiveness of European culture and history, arguing that certain cultural traits, such as individualism and a spirit of inquiry, have led to the unparalleled achievements of Western civilization. Duchesne’s work is primarily concerned with understanding the historical factors that have shaped Western societies and their global influence.

    In summary, the main differences between the work of Curt Doolittle, Kevin MacDonald, and Ricardo Duchesne are:

    Focus: Doolittle’s work is centered on political philosophy and social systems, MacDonald’s work focuses on group evolutionary strategies and their impact on society, and Duchesne’s work is concerned with the historical development and distinctiveness of Western civilization.

    Scope: Doolittle’s Propertarianism seeks to provide a general framework for understanding human behavior and social systems, MacDonald’s work is more narrowly focused on the evolutionary basis of specific group behaviors, and Duchesne’s work examines the historical factors that have shaped Western societies and their global influence.

    Objectives: Doolittle aims to develop a political philosophy that fosters cooperation, trust, and prosperity, MacDonald seeks to understand the evolutionary origins and consequences of group behaviors, and Duchesne explores the historical factors that have led to the distinctiveness and achievements of Western civilization.

    It is important to note that all three figures have attracted criticism for their ideas, with some critics arguing that their work is overly reductionist, biased, or potentially harmful.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 18:10:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642227946193670144

  • CHAT GPT ON MACDONALD AND DOOLITTLE (Was curious how it would spin this question

    CHAT GPT ON MACDONALD AND DOOLITTLE
    (Was curious how it would spin this question, but it’s not bad)

    Prompt:
    –“What is the difference between the work of american philosopher and social scientist Curt Doolittle and American psychologist and historian Kevin Macdonald?”-

    Curt Doolittle and Kevin MacDonald are both influential figures in their respective fields, but their work differs in terms of focus, scope, and objectives.

    Curt Doolittle is an American philosopher and social scientist who has developed Propertarianism, a political philosophy that emphasizes property rights, rule of law, and reciprocity as essential components of social cooperation and stability. His work seeks to create a framework for understanding human behavior, social systems, and governance, with the goal of promoting cooperation, trust, and prosperity. Doolittle’s ideas revolve around the importance of demonstrated interests, property rights, and the enforcement of reciprocity in human societies.

    Kevin MacDonald, on the other hand, is an American psychologist and historian who is best known for his controversial work on group evolutionary strategies, particularly in relation to Jewish culture and history. MacDonald has written extensively on the subject, with his most notable work being “The Culture of Critique” series, where he posits that certain characteristics of Jewish culture have evolved as part of a group strategy to enhance survival and reproductive success. MacDonald’s work is focused on understanding the evolutionary basis of group behavior and the impact of these behaviors on broader society.

    In summary, the main differences between Curt Doolittle and Kevin MacDonald’s work are:

    Focus: Doolittle’s work is centered on political philosophy, property rights, and reciprocity, while MacDonald’s work focuses on group evolutionary strategies and their impact on society.

    Scope: Doolittle’s Propertarianism seeks to provide a general framework for understanding human behavior and social systems, whereas MacDonald’s work is more narrowly focused on the evolutionary basis of specific group behaviors, particularly in relation to Jewish culture and history.

    Objectives: Doolittle aims to develop a political philosophy that fosters cooperation, trust, and prosperity, while MacDonald seeks to understand the evolutionary origins and consequences of group behaviors.

    It is important to note that both Doolittle and MacDonald have attracted criticism for their ideas, with some critics arguing that their work is overly reductionist, biased, or potentially harmful.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 17:32:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642218402054799363

  • CHAT GPT ON MACDONALD AND DOOLITTLE (Was curious how it would spin this question

    CHAT GPT ON MACDONALD AND DOOLITTLE
    (Was curious how it would spin this question, but it’s not bad)

    Prompt:
    –“What is the difference between the work of american philosopher and social scientist Curt Doolittle and American psychologist and historian Kevin Macdonald?”-

    Curt Doolittle and Kevin MacDonald are both influential figures in their respective fields, but their work differs in terms of focus, scope, and objectives.

    Curt Doolittle is an American philosopher and social scientist who has developed Propertarianism, a political philosophy that emphasizes property rights, rule of law, and reciprocity as essential components of social cooperation and stability. His work seeks to create a framework for understanding human behavior, social systems, and governance, with the goal of promoting cooperation, trust, and prosperity. Doolittle’s ideas revolve around the importance of demonstrated interests, property rights, and the enforcement of reciprocity in human societies.

    Kevin MacDonald, on the other hand, is an American psychologist and historian who is best known for his controversial work on group evolutionary strategies, particularly in relation to Jewish culture and history. MacDonald has written extensively on the subject, with his most notable work being “The Culture of Critique” series, where he posits that certain characteristics of Jewish culture have evolved as part of a group strategy to enhance survival and reproductive success. MacDonald’s work is focused on understanding the evolutionary basis of group behavior and the impact of these behaviors on broader society.

    In summary, the main differences between Curt Doolittle and Kevin MacDonald’s work are:

    Focus: Doolittle’s work is centered on political philosophy, property rights, and reciprocity, while MacDonald’s work focuses on group evolutionary strategies and their impact on society.

    Scope: Doolittle’s Propertarianism seeks to provide a general framework for understanding human behavior and social systems, whereas MacDonald’s work is more narrowly focused on the evolutionary basis of specific group behaviors, particularly in relation to Jewish culture and history.

    Objectives: Doolittle aims to develop a political philosophy that fosters cooperation, trust, and prosperity, while MacDonald seeks to understand the evolutionary origins and consequences of group behaviors.

    It is important to note that both Doolittle and MacDonald have attracted criticism for their ideas, with some critics arguing that their work is overly reductionist, biased, or potentially harmful.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 17:32:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642218401840898048

  • MORE GPT4 – BRANDING (I have no idea how I’m going to move the identity from pro

    MORE GPT4 – BRANDING
    (I have no idea how I’m going to move the identity from propertarianism (just the ethics) to natural law (the whole system))

    –“Can you summarize Curt Doolittle’s background please?”–

    Curt Doolittle is an American philosopher, social scientist, and entrepreneur. He is the founder of the Propertarian Institute, where he has developed Propertarianism, a political philosophy focused on property rights, rule of law, and reciprocity as essential components of social cooperation and stability.

    Doolittle’s educational background includes studying economics, history, and computer science. He has also worked in various industries, including technology, software development, and venture capital. This diverse experience has influenced his philosophical work and understanding of human behavior, social systems, and governance.

    His work on Propertarianism has attracted both supporters and critics. While some appreciate the emphasis on property rights and the rule of law as a means of fostering cooperation and social cohesion, others criticize his ideas as overly reductionist or argue that they might lead to undesirable social and political consequences.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 17:28:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642217391785402368