Theme: Agency

  • WHAT DO MEN WANT FROM WOMEN —“CURT: What do men want from women?”— Emotional

    WHAT DO MEN WANT FROM WOMEN

    —“CURT: What do men want from women?”—

    Emotional rewards, friendship, play, sex, affection, nesting-caretaking (feeding especially), family(his own tribe), long term security – since we accumulate much more damage in life.

    Men have no care except sex until they marry you, and after that they have many many cares more than they evolved to care for. Women can track 1000 little things nearby and in the present. Men track a few things at a distance, and in the future. This is the difference between men and women. We specialize and women generalize. We think in drawers, one open at a time. Women think in a world of nearly uncontrollable interruptions.

    You consider your emotional care for a man as ‘work’ or ‘cost’ but a man sees everything he does other than live with a few men in a cave, hunting, and playing with tools as a cost in order to obtain affection, care, sex, and the social status that his fellow men demand of him in exchange for trusting him.

    Men are aware that the vast majority are evolutionarily disposable and the vast majority of women are not. We are aware that we conduct experiments against reality and women select us for sex affection and reproduction depending upon our success as individuals and members of a team (pack). We are also aware of our real chances – and that for the majority of us they are not that good. We are aware that the cost of specialization means men vary more in ability and desirability than women. And that means that many of us must take extraordinary risks and accumulate cellular damage in order to obtain access to any women and any reproduction and any care at all.

    The testosterone that makes us different will eventually kill all men. It is a magical poison. A faustian bargain with the devil. We mature more slowly, we peak later, we accumulate more damage, and we die sooner. We know this. We are often very careful after 40 for this reason.

    For these reasons men will seek to produce a diverse meritocratic order with as many opportunities to demonstrate success in climbing the dominance hierarchy as possible. This is why diversity increases crime, violence, and political tension: groups are demonstrably better and worse at climbing dominance hierarchies in the modern world. While we are wealthier, it is increasingly difficult for a man to earn enough of a living to support a woman and her children in exchange for sex and affection.

    Explaining the world of emotions to us. Explaining the concerns of others to us. Giving us ideas of where and where not to apply our various kinds of ‘force’.

    Acknowledgement that men’s need for sex is physical, on the scale of women’s need for security.

    Understanding that ‘reminding’ is nagging, and nagging evolved so that women could train children. But every time you remind a man, it is the equivalent of him telling you that you’re ass is too fat to wear that dress. Every single time. We just suffer the insult more easily than you. But it is an insult and destructive every time. Men are not trained by reminding. They are trained by rewards.

    It’s not that we don’t care it’s that we are color blind to the categories that you see, just as you are (and you can’t admit it or even recognize it) blind to what we see: politics as a proxy for violence with other men, so that our genes survive into the future in a condition better than they are in the present.

    Think of many small ways to make your man successful. We are like dogs who will fetch a ball until we drop dead. But like wolves we respond (violently) to commands or guilt.

    We are not substitutes for girlfriends, nesting helpers, older daughters, your mother or your sisters. We are men. We compete with other men to obtain the status necessary to make us attractive to women, who then care for us in exchange for provision and labor.

    Limit your nesting urges to that which is productive not consumptive. Consumerism is just a different form of alcoholism. Limit your men’s play to that which provides returns for him and the family. Everything else is extending childhood. Do the same for your boys.

    Men need fire gazing(daydreaming), watching the horizon for prey(watching sports), or chipping flints (playing with tools) the way women need to chat about nonsense with other women. We can’t function without them, but both can become addictions.

    Making boys sit and be quiet like girls causes them brain damage that they will never recover from. Making them timit and non-aggressive does the same. Men compete in dominance hierarchies. By making life easy for you by creating a docile boy, you are crippling him for life. You want a man that sits around the house watching video games and television? blame his mother. His wife will blame you for the same. And after four generations your genes will be dispersed and gone. Why? Strong men defeat weak men, and weak men are made by weak women.

    Demands upon men that are good: If you are slept, fed, dressed, and fucked you need to be getting enough exercise, competing with and cooperating with other men, and producing long term assets for the family. End of story.

    Women have taken over the ‘easy’ jobs in society pushing men into higher competition roles, where it is harder to ‘integrate’ into the team, and it is harder for males who evolved to specialize, to integrate into teams. This means that there are decreasing chances for many men to find success.

    We no longer work in groups where we insure one another as we did as laborers, craftsmen, in villages, in guilds, and in armies. every man is more vulnerable now than he has been in the past and is less ‘insured’ by his fellow men. His emotional stress is high but he doesn’t understand why.

    So what these two things mean, is that men must feel that they can at least not fall down in the dominance hierarchy and therefore loose their ability to obtain sex, affection, and caretaking.

    Generally speaking, whenever there is a surplus of men who feel this way a civilization will go through a civil war or collapse. Because it takes a very small percentage of males willint to disrupt the current order in order to overthrow it.

    Men evolved to climb a dominance hierarchy, and women evolved to be attracted to the highest point on that hierarchy that they can obtain control over their reproduction and provision, and entertainment from.

    Men are absurdly simple creatures. We just can’t see, hear, smell, intuit, feel or think all the subtleties about humans that women can, and so we have more time to devote to learning how the physical world works, and specializing in it, and competing by our understanding and use of it.

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 12:14:00 UTC

  • ( So here is the thing. Thanks to my family, I seem to have physically recovered

    ( So here is the thing. Thanks to my family, I seem to have physically recovered from the past two years, and have most of my health under control again. And while some of it is diet and environment, I assume it is also dependent upon the season. No matter what I do, supplements included, the winters are just brutal for me, and I perform poorly from november to march. Now, if I work on both coding and writing it is too draining, and both suffer. writing requires contemplation and synthesis (free association) and is tolerant of constant trial and error. Coding requires disciplined short term memory, and is intolerant of trial and error. And so it is very much like thinking with different parts of your brain. I attribute the difficulty to the learning curve. Interestingly, managing projects, designing features, testing doesn’t stress me but the coding seems to. This decline in my functionality is more evident in my writing than my coding. But I have definitely been overdoing the coding such that I’m making less progress by devoting more time to it. When after I’ve eaten and slept I solve in a moment what had frustrated me for hours the night before. So this is putting additional stress on me since I don’t seem to be able to code as many hours as I used to. I’ve been slowly cutting out the negative people from my social group and this has helped. I’m still very stressed about my friends and family in Ukraine, and how much I miss them. I try not to think about it.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-30 10:31:00 UTC

  • YOU WILL BECOME WHAT YOU IDOLIZE. BUT WHAT YOU IDOLIZE MAY NOT BE WORTHY, AND MA

    YOU WILL BECOME WHAT YOU IDOLIZE. BUT WHAT YOU IDOLIZE MAY NOT BE WORTHY, AND MAY IN FACT BE DISASTROUS

    —“A man’s idols are a reflection both of what he sees in himself and of what he wishes to become (or wishes he could become). All of my “idols” are known for being renowned leaders of strong nations, men who had a hand in changing the societal order of their times and ultimately men of moral uprightness. Perhaps the most amusing (yet bitter) thing to me is that when I ask the fellow men in my generation who their idols are, the responses range from sports players to spineless politicians to f@66y musicians in boy bands. It is not difficult to see the reflections of their idols in their character. Always be aware of who you are giving reverence and why.”– Grant T Matthews


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 11:20:00 UTC

  • Heroes = External order and personal change vs Anti-heroes = External chaos and

    Heroes = External order and personal change

    vs

    Anti-heroes = External chaos and personal stability.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 11:11:00 UTC

  • (for archiving) Running is a very efficient form of energy expenditure and if yo

    (for archiving)

    Running is a very efficient form of energy expenditure and if you don’t overdo it, you won’t hurt yourself very easily. You can get the same value out of hiking or walking at the cost of increasing time at exercise. So running is just efficient. But it works the same muscle groups and it actually can make you injury prone unless its over uneven terrain. (Spoken as someone who spent a year taping his feet to recover from plantar fascia injuries.)

    One of the reasons that the military has always focused on marching twenty miles or more with gear is to build up minor muscles, build cardio, pulmonary, liver, and kidney efficiency, is that it’s makes you exhausted, but exposes you to little risk of injury. Moreover it depletes your brain and combined with surprise commands, teaches you how to function ‘explosively’ on demand even when you are cognitively impaired. If you look at the special forces guys they are athletes not weight lifters. It is far easier to pass endurance stress while retaining mental discipline – which is the test of special forces – if you are able to perform while physically and cognitively depleted.

    The problem is fitness vs bulk. The bigger you get the more calories, oxygen, cardio, and pulmonary you need, and you generally lose the most important ‘aryan’ advantages: speed, agility, and endurance (ooda loops).

    As far as I know complex motions like ‘rolling that big industrial tire’, chopping wood, crawling across grass or swimming, and climbing trees and ladders, all produce the best overall fitness without damage. (I have only had injuries lifting weights, because it is very easy to ‘overdo’ it on minor muscles with )

    However, if you are careful and just lift a few heavy things a few times a week, plus walk a bit, you can achieve almost all of the good. So, weight decreases time.

    Unfortunately, those of us with asthma face a constant challenge. Even though I was the fastest sprinter in my class in grade school I have never been able to run distances. I can hike at fairly good pace now that I’m no longer seriously ill, and I can walk pretty much forever. And I can get away with a sprint. But lifting has become almost unbearable. When it was, for most of my life, my favorite way of staying fit. The most fit I have ever been is working an office job, using a simple barbell set at home before work. I naturally walk around a lot, even if writing. The big decline in my fitness was my long struggle with my health. When I tried crossfit while still carrying cancer around, I seriously thought it would die.

    It is non trivial to function competitively while deprived of sleep, water, food, while physically and mentally exhausted, hot or cold, and stressed from the possibility of being killed by a bullet at distance.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 17:32:00 UTC

  • “Islam functions as weaponized hedonism for primitive low-agency males.”– Austy

    –“Islam functions as weaponized hedonism for primitive low-agency males.”– Austyn Pember


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 19:33:00 UTC

  • THE JOY OF MORAL LICENSE TO USE VIOLENCE Men need moral license. They are all to

    THE JOY OF MORAL LICENSE TO USE VIOLENCE

    Men need moral license. They are all too happy to use violence when they have any chance of survival. There is nothing more spiritual than hunting, and nothing more exciting than hunting men. And once they experience it, they like it so much, they are often hard to return to previous condition. There is nothing more dangerous to a people than the soldiers who return for the peace.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 17:21:00 UTC

  • WE CAN IMPROVE OUR INDIVIDUAL SENSES AND NOT IMPROVE ACTIONABILITY OR WE CAN IMP

    WE CAN IMPROVE OUR INDIVIDUAL SENSES AND NOT IMPROVE ACTIONABILITY OR WE CAN IMPROVE OUR ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND IMPROVE ACTIONABILITY

    We process what we can act upon nearly all of the texture, tasted, smell, temperature, physical vibration, sound vibration, electromagnetic ‘vibration’ we can act upon. Like most animals we evolved a distributed ability to ‘sense’ through our physical distribution, communication and territorial monitoring.

    Evolution was ‘smart’ in the sense that we cannot sense information we cannot act upon. There was little value to us in increased precision of any of our senses, because it would interfere with decidability, and decidability is limited to to that which is actionable.

    Conversely, we can augment our senses mechanically and we are able to generalize almost infinitely, and so with sound, smell, vibration, taste, sight, and speed enhancements there is no evidence that we could not process the information. All it would do is reduce our need for numbers to distribute the acts of perception over distance.

    So I’m hinting here at the error of individualism when judging our senses, perceptions, calculations, and decisions. And that ones judgement of our senses is determined by ones preference for social and political order. And ones preference of social and political order, is a reflection of one’s experiential, reproductive, cooperative, strategy.

    So if one is hopeful for liberty in a heterogeneous order one sees the limits of senses being the individual. If one sees homogenous kinship order at scale, one sees the limit of the senses being the band, tribe, polity, or nation.

    If one desires to circumvent an order, or to dominate an order, he may desire additional senses beyond that which he can act upon, and which others can act upon. But if one desires to operate within that order, he desires only to ensure the quality of information within that order.

    Ergo, I would seek to improve the quality of information within that order.

    Now, as to ‘illusion’ we can find very little evidence of this. What we find instead is that because of heterogeneous strategies, heterogeneous interests, heterogeneous values, heterogenous information, and outright disinformation, and lack of ability to deflate this heterogeneity, we IMAGINE that we sense and perceive falsely, and we IMAGINE many relations between events, and this CONFUSION may convince us that see very little. But this problem can be solved either by expanding the quality of the information available to an individual despite its in-actionabilty, or we can expand quality of information available to members of the group for both individual and group actionability.

    Since liberty is only existential when actionable, and actionable only possible in a polity, then the answer is rather obvious…

    So I want to improve the quality of information in an increasing division of perception, cognition, action knowledge, and advocacy;

    And given that we cannot know what is true, only what is false;

    And as far as I know, given the wide variation of cognitive ability,

    Then, this can only be achieved through providing in environmental context (Institution, tradition, norm, environment and information) that which prohibits DISINFORMATION.

    Ergo. Natural law in all things.

    If one has the power to change the narrative (contextual information) and and the metaphysics(assumptions) within it, and the general rules within it, one can choose the degree of truthfulness (deflation) existential in the method of narrative.

    The only question then is whether one possesses the knowledge to do so, and is willing to pay the higher cost of imposing truthful and deflationary rather than untruthful and conflationary models.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 07:42:00 UTC

  • “The capacity to delay gratification is like interest: those who understand it,

    —“The capacity to delay gratification is like interest: those who understand it, make it (interest); those that don’t understand, pay it – in spades.”—Anne Tripp


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-25 15:01:00 UTC

  • Think: 3 by 3 View the situation from 3 points of view: Yours, theirs, and God’s

    Think: 3 by 3

    View the situation from 3 points of view: Yours, theirs, and God’s.

    View your choices from 3 points of view: how will you feel about that choice tomorrow, in three months, and in three years?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-25 13:31:00 UTC