Curt Doolittle

Theme: Agency

  • WHY DO WOMEN HIT ME? (humor with wisdom) lolz… why do all the women in my life

    WHY DO WOMEN HIT ME?

    (humor with wisdom)

    lolz… why do all the women in my life always threaten me with bodily harm? I have to teach every woman around me not to hit me. Really.

    (Answer from a woman: “It’s retaliation. You tease too much, and you have no boundaries, and you aren’t even aware of anyone else’s boundaries. So we retaliate by the only means possible: a whack in the head, or the promise of something worse.”)

    (Ok. That’s true. lol My understanding of my subconscious is that Women need sovereignty in a nest because they don’t have it elsewhere. But women need boundaries outside the next. And they need boundaries regarding me, money, business, politics, and war. So I set them. With a bit of humor. But the ‘law’ is clear: none of that nonsense outside the nest. 😉 )

    God I love women. Really. I mean. Seriously. I just don’t want to compete with them outside the nest, because I don’t want to win, because I can win, but I dont like the consequences of winning.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 12:31:00 UTC

  • Why Do Women Hit Me?

    (humor with wisdom) lolz… why do all the women in my life always threaten me with bodily harm? I have to teach every woman around me not to hit me. Really. (Answer from a woman: “It’s retaliation. You tease too much, and you have no boundaries, and you aren’t even aware of anyone else’s boundaries. So we retaliate by the only means possible: a whack in the head, or the promise of something worse.”) (Ok. That’s true. lol My understanding of my subconscious is that Women need sovereignty in a nest because they don’t have it elsewhere. But women need boundaries outside the next. And they need boundaries regarding me, money, business, politics, and war. So I set them. With a bit of humor. But the ‘law’ is clear: none of that nonsense outside the nest. 😉 ) God I love women. Really. I mean. Seriously. I just don’t want to compete with them outside the nest, because I don’t want to win, because I can win, but I dont like the consequences of winning.

  • “The most dangerous enemy won’t be the one killing you physically themselves, bu

    –“The most dangerous enemy won’t be the one killing you physically themselves, but the one that convinces you to kill yourself.”— Muller Louw via James Santagata

  • I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive

    I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive external correspondence instead of confirming internal consistency. We are really REALLY bad at surviving logical overloading. I mean… math is interesting simply because it is so simple, that from that trivial simplicity we can construct deterministic consequences, beyond our ability to imagine.

  • I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive

    I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive external correspondence instead of confirming internal consistency. We are really REALLY bad at surviving logical overloading. I mean… math is interesting simply because it is so simple, that from that trivial simplicity we can construct deterministic consequences, beyond our ability to imagine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 11:48:00 UTC

  • I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive

    I mean. Humans are GREAT at logic. We are not so good at discovering disruptive external correspondence instead of confirming internal consistency. We are really REALLY bad at surviving logical overloading. I mean… math is interesting simply because it is so simple, that from that trivial simplicity we can construct deterministic consequences, beyond our ability to imagine.

  • by Eli Harman “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out

    by Eli Harman “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out bad ideas; just as it is not “white knighting” to interfere in an act of domestic abuse. When one individual seeks to dominate another individual, regardless of the specific characteristics of these individuals, it is incumbent upon those who actually believe in liberty to speak out. Believe it or not some people are more concerned with what is right and good than with what others think of them.” ———- Most people demonstrably prefer dominance hierarchies, even dominance hierarchies they aren’t at the top of. You would have to coerce them, violating your own principles, in order to override that preference. You’re unlikely to persuade them. A stable dominance hierarchy passes along enough benefits, even to those near the bottom, to secure their willing support. What do you offer people? Freedom and responsibility most of them can’t handle, don’t want, and wouldn’t know what to do with? Good luck selling that. What is right: imaginary. What is good: subjective. What others think of you: not the be all end all, but of more consequence than your autistic brain weights it. Of course, some people just like to kick sh_t over or burn it down. And there is no problem with suppressing such troublemakers, if what they are trying to upset is of value to most. Then it just becomes a question of who will prevail. Every so often, the status quo really is rotten and corrupt, and won’t survive that clash. Now is probably one of those times. But you don’t have the medicine we need.

  • by Eli Harman “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out

    by Eli Harman

    “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out bad ideas; just as it is not “white knighting” to interfere in an act of domestic abuse. When one individual seeks to dominate another individual, regardless of the specific characteristics of these individuals, it is incumbent upon those who actually believe in liberty to speak out. Believe it or not some people are more concerned with what is right and good than with what others think of them.”

    ———-

    Most people demonstrably prefer dominance hierarchies, even dominance hierarchies they aren’t at the top of. You would have to coerce them, violating your own principles, in order to override that preference. You’re unlikely to persuade them.

    A stable dominance hierarchy passes along enough benefits, even to those near the bottom, to secure their willing support.

    What do you offer people? Freedom and responsibility most of them can’t handle, don’t want, and wouldn’t know what to do with? Good luck selling that.

    What is right: imaginary.

    What is good: subjective.

    What others think of you: not the be all end all, but of more consequence than your autistic brain weights it.

    Of course, some people just like to kick sh_t over or burn it down. And there is no problem with suppressing such troublemakers, if what they are trying to upset is of value to most. Then it just becomes a question of who will prevail.

    Every so often, the status quo really is rotten and corrupt, and won’t survive that clash. Now is probably one of those times. But you don’t have the medicine we need.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 10:20:00 UTC

  • by Eli Harman “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out

    by Eli Harman “I will offer that it is not “white knighting” to simply call out bad ideas; just as it is not “white knighting” to interfere in an act of domestic abuse. When one individual seeks to dominate another individual, regardless of the specific characteristics of these individuals, it is incumbent upon those who actually believe in liberty to speak out. Believe it or not some people are more concerned with what is right and good than with what others think of them.” ———- Most people demonstrably prefer dominance hierarchies, even dominance hierarchies they aren’t at the top of. You would have to coerce them, violating your own principles, in order to override that preference. You’re unlikely to persuade them. A stable dominance hierarchy passes along enough benefits, even to those near the bottom, to secure their willing support. What do you offer people? Freedom and responsibility most of them can’t handle, don’t want, and wouldn’t know what to do with? Good luck selling that. What is right: imaginary. What is good: subjective. What others think of you: not the be all end all, but of more consequence than your autistic brain weights it. Of course, some people just like to kick sh_t over or burn it down. And there is no problem with suppressing such troublemakers, if what they are trying to upset is of value to most. Then it just becomes a question of who will prevail. Every so often, the status quo really is rotten and corrupt, and won’t survive that clash. Now is probably one of those times. But you don’t have the medicine we need.

  • We do not consent with nature. We do not avoid it or deny it. We defeat it

    We do not consent with nature.

    We do not avoid it or deny it.

    We defeat it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 10:16:00 UTC