Theme: Agency

  • The Purpose of Stoicism(mindfulness)

    The purpose of stoicism(mindfulness) is to allow you distance from your impulses so that you may train them rather than be goverened by the chaos of them. The difference between buddhism and stoicism is action. Stoicism/dominance vs Buddhism/Submission. Which people will argue with me, but the evidence is the evidence. People need mindfulness to limit calculability (difficulty in in formation processing). We can construct it by bad means (islamic submission), ok means (buddhist meditation), adequate means (homogenous kin groups and rituals), or exceptional means (stoic self authoring and incremental successes in competition in the real world).

  • The Urban Area as Generator of Schizophrenia (and Therefore Leftism)

    A particularly stable and replicable finding has been the association between living in an urban environment and the development of schizophrenia, even after factors such as drug use, ethnic group and size of social group have been controlled for.[153] A recent study of 4.4 million men and women in Sweden found a 68%–77% increased risk of diagnosed psychosis for people living in the most urbanized environments, a significant proportion of which is likely to be described as schizophrenia.[154] The effect does not appear to be due to a higher incidence of obstetric complications in urban environments.[155] The risk increases with the number of years and degree of urban living in childhood and adolescence, suggesting that constant, cumulative, or repeated exposures during upbringing occurring more frequently in urbanized areas are responsible for the association.[156] Various possible explanations for the effect have been judged unlikely based on the nature of the findings, including infectious causes or a generic stress effect. It is thought to interact with genetic dispositions and, since there appears to be nonrandom variation even across different neighborhoods, and an independent association with social isolation, it has been proposed that the degree of “social capital” (e.g. degree of mutual trust, bonding and safety in neighborhoods) can exert a developmental impact on children growing up in these environments.[157]

  • 2) … , and if including choice, rational choice (praxeologiccal consistency),

    2) … , and if including choice, rational choice (praxeologiccal consistency), and if including reciprocity (morality: reciprocal praxeological consistency), then we do not know if we have falsified our fantasies (free associations). Confirmations don’t tell us anything.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 20:39:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995040787736997888

    Reply addressees: @Noblesm85

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995040281740365825


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Noblesm85 1) I don’t think you understand that logics are not closed – they only test possibility (survivability) and without categorical consistency, logical consistency (internal consistency) operational consistency (existential possibility), full accounting, parsimony, and limits ….

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/995040281740365825


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Noblesm85 1) I don’t think you understand that logics are not closed – they only test possibility (survivability) and without categorical consistency, logical consistency (internal consistency) operational consistency (existential possibility), full accounting, parsimony, and limits ….

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/995040281740365825

  • Recipes for action (operations), vs search algorithms for finding opportunities.

    Recipes for action (operations), vs search algorithms for finding opportunities.
    You probably can’t invert from justification to falsification and permanent uncertainty.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 20:33:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995039174335062016

    Reply addressees: @Noblesm85

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994979373349527552


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Noblesm85

    @curtdoolittle You: We don’t need to make a statement about the physical universe because our actions aren’t contingent upon our understanding; even though I’m going to pretend that my actions actually gives me a piece of evolutionary knowledge- which I made no hypothesis on.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994979373349527552

  • It doesn’t require belief, that’s what you’re stuck on. It requires only that I

    It doesn’t require belief, that’s what you’re stuck on. It requires only that I increasingly expand my ability to take actions, that perform transformations. I don’t hold ‘beliefs’. I merely falsify everything, retain what survives, and continue building possible actions.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 20:31:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995038755319926784

    Reply addressees: @Noblesm85

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994980601752117248


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Noblesm85

    @curtdoolittle 1) Induction is not our only method of understanding existence; we also have deduction and abduction.

    2) I confused nothing. Your empiricism requires the belief that you can understand the universe, ie, the rational intelligibility of the universe.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994980601752117248

  • Emotionless vs Emotionally Disciplined

    emotionless = one does not have emotions of the intensity necessary to interfere with one’s thoughts, words, displays and deeds -versus- emotionally disciplined = one does not let emotions interfere with one’s thoughts, words, displays and deeds..

  • Emotionless vs Emotionally Disciplined

    emotionless = one does not have emotions of the intensity necessary to interfere with one’s thoughts, words, displays and deeds -versus- emotionally disciplined = one does not let emotions interfere with one’s thoughts, words, displays and deeds..

  • There is no god, but Men – Men of Truth , Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and

    There is no god, but Men – Men of Truth , Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Maneuver. We are the gods. That is why the liars, the weak, the ignorant, the incompetent and the unsovereign had to invent false gods – to oppose us. With the unification of horse, wheel, bronze, maneuver, oath, and sovereignty, we invented the means by which to bend man, beast, and nature to our will or break them all to pieces. The religions were invented to create false gods for the weak, to substitute for the Aristocracy of the real. Our heroes, demigods, and gods teach, assist, or interfere, but never can they defeat us. In stead, we seek to unseat and replace them. For weak gods have no stay against the minds of men.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 12:50:00 UTC

  • We are the gods.

    There is no god, but Men – Men of Truth , Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Maneuver. We are the gods. That is why the liars, the weak, the ignorant, the incompetent and the unsovereign had to invent false gods – to oppose us. With the unification of horse, wheel, bronze, maneuver, oath, and sovereignty, we invented the means by which to bend man, beast, and nature to our will or break them all to pieces. The religions were invented to create false gods for the weak, to substitute for the Aristocracy of the real. Our heroes, demigods, and gods teach, assist, or interfere, but never can they defeat us. In stead, we seek to unseat and replace them. For weak gods have no stay against the minds of men.

  • We are the gods.

    There is no god, but Men – Men of Truth , Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Maneuver. We are the gods. That is why the liars, the weak, the ignorant, the incompetent and the unsovereign had to invent false gods – to oppose us. With the unification of horse, wheel, bronze, maneuver, oath, and sovereignty, we invented the means by which to bend man, beast, and nature to our will or break them all to pieces. The religions were invented to create false gods for the weak, to substitute for the Aristocracy of the real. Our heroes, demigods, and gods teach, assist, or interfere, but never can they defeat us. In stead, we seek to unseat and replace them. For weak gods have no stay against the minds of men.