2) … , and if including choice, rational choice (praxeologiccal consistency), and if including reciprocity (morality: reciprocal praxeological consistency), then we do not know if we have falsified our fantasies (free associations). Confirmations don’t tell us anything.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 20:39:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995040787736997888
Reply addressees: @Noblesm85
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995040281740365825
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Noblesm85 1) I don’t think you understand that logics are not closed – they only test possibility (survivability) and without categorical consistency, logical consistency (internal consistency) operational consistency (existential possibility), full accounting, parsimony, and limits ….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/995040281740365825
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Noblesm85 1) I don’t think you understand that logics are not closed – they only test possibility (survivability) and without categorical consistency, logical consistency (internal consistency) operational consistency (existential possibility), full accounting, parsimony, and limits ….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/995040281740365825
Leave a Reply