—“Corporal Punishment, Limited Self Expression, Sacredness and the elimination of self expression”—
You get what you measure, but is what you measure that which is good?
Stress is good.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 11:21:00 UTC
—“Corporal Punishment, Limited Self Expression, Sacredness and the elimination of self expression”—
You get what you measure, but is what you measure that which is good?
Stress is good.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 11:21:00 UTC
—“Of all evil I deem you capable: Therefore I want good from you. Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws.”—Friedrich Nietzsche
(h/t:Amed Reda)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 08:29:00 UTC
As in all things: men overestimate their knowledge and ability prior to performing sufficient research in the specialty such that they are not engaging in dunning kruger overestimation of their abilities. I have no idea why men think they know such things from personal experience, or the mainstream narrative. Economics are simple. Generals are simple. Destroy what people dpend upon for predictabiliyt and chaos is the only possible result. My job, and the job of others, over the next year, is to help men envision what winning a civil war will look like in the current era. And it will NOT look like those revolutions of the Westphalian era. We have ended Westphalian constraints, and we’ve ended the era of millions in the streets, and we’ve ended the enlightenment experiment in an aristocracy of everyone. No one is going to put your pants on for you. You either fight or you talk, or you cower, or you’re the enemy. May 29, 2018 10:51am
As in all things: men overestimate their knowledge and ability prior to performing sufficient research in the specialty such that they are not engaging in dunning kruger overestimation of their abilities. I have no idea why men think they know such things from personal experience, or the mainstream narrative. Economics are simple. Generals are simple. Destroy what people dpend upon for predictabiliyt and chaos is the only possible result. My job, and the job of others, over the next year, is to help men envision what winning a civil war will look like in the current era. And it will NOT look like those revolutions of the Westphalian era. We have ended Westphalian constraints, and we’ve ended the era of millions in the streets, and we’ve ended the enlightenment experiment in an aristocracy of everyone. No one is going to put your pants on for you. You either fight or you talk, or you cower, or you’re the enemy. May 29, 2018 10:51am
I’ve addressed why some people need drugs, alcohol, the new age, occult, religion, the fictionalisms, and why others do not. Its not that I don’t understand these needs. i understand why most women lack agency, and some men lack agency, an how these physical and emotional devices provide self medication for that lack of agency, under socialization, or low sexual, social, and economic market value. its just that they are irrelevant to decidability under law, just as they are to any other science.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 20:27:00 UTC
Yes, but then moral men need a plan. And it’s our job to give it to them. They feel moral license. They just don’t know what to demand, or how to win. Some of us know both.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 19:46:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1001550321481605121
Reply addressees: @GuerillaRight
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1001480877409492992
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1001480877409492992
DUNNING KRUGER REVOLUTIONARY IGNORANCE
As in all things: men overestimate their knowledge and ability prior to performing sufficient research in the specialty such that they are not engaging in dunning kruger overestimation of their abilities.
I have no idea why men think they know such things from personal experience, or the mainstream narrative.
Economics are simple. Generals are simple. Destroy what people dpend upon for predictabiliyt and chaos is the only possible result.
My job, and the job of others, over the next year, is to help men envision what winning a civil war will look like in the current era.
And it will NOT look like those revolutions of the Westphalian era. We have ended Westphalian constraints, and we’ve ended the era of millions in the streets, and we’ve ended the enlightenment experiment in an aristocracy of everyone.
No one is going to put your pants on for you. You either fight or you talk, or you cower, or you’re the enemy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 10:51:00 UTC
Tossing a ball to a dog so he can grasp it.
Tossing a ball to a dog so he will fetch (return) it for more play (human behavior), rather than chase him to obtain it (dog behavior) as play.
Bouncing a ball off a wall so the dog can catch it on the bounce, and then return it.
Tossing a ball on a slanted roof so the dog can catch it as it rolls off, and then return it.
Tossing a ball over the house so the dog must run around the house to find, and fetch it – especially if he can’t hear it bounce – and then return it.
It’s been surprisingly difficult to train a dog to do the last one. Although I suspect that’s because our house was quite complicated – requiring the dog leave the front yard, enter the courtyard, turn left, cross the courtyard, exit the courtyard, turn right, run down the side of the house, enter the back yard from a corner, and then find it.
I had to do it in steps. Further back every time.
The Golden much smarter than the Pointer – who would just sit there confused.
Retaining state, and recursive processing is extremely difficult. Man cannot imagine not doing it. Dog needs training to do it. A crow can do it given the opportunity. An octopus can do it.
But it’s pretty hard.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-29 10:32:00 UTC
Really?Answer three questions: (a)Are all choices rational, or are people capable of irrational choice? (b)Are all conflicts decidable by tests of reciprocity or are there any conflicts not so decidable? (c)Have all legal systems converged on reciprocity or have any failed to?
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-27 19:11:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1000816774688968705
Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1000812022441771008
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1000812022441771008
—“Do Men have a duty of violence or privilege of guardianship?”—Brian Barr
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-26 22:02:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1000497479874424832