Theme: Agency

  • HOW MUCH AGENCY DO WE HAVE? Via Eric Danelaw The broader question is, how much a

    HOW MUCH AGENCY DO WE HAVE?

    Via Eric Danelaw

    The broader question is, how much agency do we have? Women and men demonstrably think very differently because of the difference between utility and truth, and between proportionality and reciprocity, and between dysgenia and eugenia. Why do we assume that this same cognitive bias is limited to gender rather than a balance between the genders, and that different groups don’t just demonstrate the male cognitive bias or the female cognitive bias?

    Truth, Reciprocity, and Physical Violence that Ends when Ended, VERSUS Fraud, Proportionality, and Reputation Destruction that Never Ends until Destroyed. Violence and Threats versus Shaming, Ridicule, Gossip, Straw Manning, Rallying, and Reputation Destruction. Those are the Male versus female competitive strategies.

    HERD <—————> PACK

    Utility <—————> Truth

    Proportionality <——> Reciprocity

    Equality <————-> Meritocracy

    Dysgenia <———–> Eugenia

    r <——————–> K

    F<——————–> M

    There is nothing in mankind that is complicated other than the lies we tell ourselves and others in order to achieve our desired ends.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-07 11:20:00 UTC

  • REMOVE WOMEN FROM RELIGION AND MEN FROM MILITARY? OR TEACH MANDATORY STOICISM RE

    REMOVE WOMEN FROM RELIGION AND MEN FROM MILITARY? OR TEACH MANDATORY STOICISM REGARDLESS OF GENDER?

    (important piece) (synthesis) (from curt doolittle)

    If we remove Women women from religion, they just move into pseudo-rationalism (sophism), and pseudoscience, or simply outright denialism. A disproportionate number of Women – largely those whose cognitive load has not been consumed by having children – lack the agency to contemplate that which is economic, political, and military, because their intuition does not scale beyond the subjectively perceivable. This is why women dominate the psychotic and solipsistic end of the spectrum, and why men dominate the analytic and autistic end of the spectrum. We evolved differences in brains and neurochemistry to divide the labor of child (women) and pack (men).

    It’s not complicated. It’s Abrahamic, Marxist, Postmodern, and Feminist pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and Denialism that cause attempt to obscure reality as a means of sedating the mind that lacks agency. Mindfulness is necessary. It is easier for men. But we have more agency (independence from our emotions) to start with. But it is more important for women, who have less independence from their emotions.

    Religion teaches submissive equalitarian inclusiveness as mindfulness. Military teaches hierarchical loyalty inclusiveness as mindfulness. Both produce mindfulness. Our civilization as always preserved both markets. The Abrahamic Attack on the West from both Ashkenazi and French Authors, and to a lesser extent German (but not italian or british), has sought to create a pseudoscientific, pseudo-rational, and denialist monopoly cult, where the aristocracy preserved the competition between the church, market, and military.

    The aristocracy failed to resurrect stoicism primarily because they were so dedicated to the market (division and balance of powers between the institutions that they were incognizant of the option) that they ‘let the market do its job’ (as usual) without realizing the utility of abusing the 19th/20th century media, and the conversion of the academy (previously a middle class training ground) from a market to a new-theological institution.

    So the Academy, Media, Cult-State complex sought to form a monopoly that the Aristocracy, Academy-Merchant Class, Church never aspired to. This is the reason for the systematic destruction of the Military, and the Systematic Purch of the military from government – which was it’s historical role. And finally, the use of activism in the courts to remove rule of law by which the Cult, Market, and Aristocracy were mediated.

    This is all you need to understand: The left-feminine monopoly herd, versus the right-masculine market of packs.

    Knowledge can produce agency, but only if the market for knowledge suppresses sufficient falsehood that the market demand for falsehoods is suppressed.

    Ergo: Natural Law : Propertarianism: Rule of Law.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-07 10:30:00 UTC

  • Um … We have a tendency to seek patterns that allow us to predict future state

    Um … We have a tendency to seek patterns that allow us to predict future states. It’s all that hierarchies of neurons do. When we study continuous data over a long period of time we adjust. If the article suggests we can shortcut that process it’s hard to believe….


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-07 00:39:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048734589995442177

    Reply addressees: @SteveStuWill

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048371417853480960


    IN REPLY TO:

    @SteveStuWill

    The Binary Bias: People have a tendency to impose categorical distinctions on continuous data https://t.co/OwyPNrqj90 https://t.co/lSfrZtKi29

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048371417853480960

  • How Much Agency Do We Have?

    October 7th, 2018 11:20 AM HOW MUCH AGENCY DO WE HAVE? Via Eric Danelaw The broader question is, how much agency do we have? Women and men demonstrably think very differently because of the difference between utility and truth, and between proportionality and reciprocity, and between dysgenia and eugenia. Why do we assume that this same cognitive bias is limited to gender rather than a balance between the genders, and that different groups don’t just demonstrate the male cognitive bias or the female cognitive bias? Truth, Reciprocity, and Physical Violence that Ends when Ended, VERSUS Fraud, Proportionality, and Reputation Destruction that Never Ends until Destroyed. Violence and Threats versus Shaming, Ridicule, Gossip, Straw Manning, Rallying, and Reputation Destruction. Those are the Male versus female competitive strategies. HERD <—————> PACK Utility <—————> Truth Proportionality <——> Reciprocity Equality <————-> Meritocracy Dysgenia <———–> Eugenia r <——————–> K F<——————–> M There is nothing in mankind that is complicated other than the lies we tell ourselves and others in order to achieve our desired ends.

  • How Much Agency Do We Have?

    October 7th, 2018 11:20 AM HOW MUCH AGENCY DO WE HAVE? Via Eric Danelaw The broader question is, how much agency do we have? Women and men demonstrably think very differently because of the difference between utility and truth, and between proportionality and reciprocity, and between dysgenia and eugenia. Why do we assume that this same cognitive bias is limited to gender rather than a balance between the genders, and that different groups don’t just demonstrate the male cognitive bias or the female cognitive bias? Truth, Reciprocity, and Physical Violence that Ends when Ended, VERSUS Fraud, Proportionality, and Reputation Destruction that Never Ends until Destroyed. Violence and Threats versus Shaming, Ridicule, Gossip, Straw Manning, Rallying, and Reputation Destruction. Those are the Male versus female competitive strategies. HERD <—————> PACK Utility <—————> Truth Proportionality <——> Reciprocity Equality <————-> Meritocracy Dysgenia <———–> Eugenia r <——————–> K F<——————–> M There is nothing in mankind that is complicated other than the lies we tell ourselves and others in order to achieve our desired ends.

  • “And therein lies the trap. Those who can personally handle freedom and individu

    —“And therein lies the trap. Those who can personally handle freedom and individual responsibility and user-pays-for-commons, assume everyone else is also capable of the agency required to exercise such freedoms.”— Howard Van Der Klauw


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-06 14:36:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048582675957780480

  • Sophism. Does this need a criticism? Word as Real and Imagination as Primary, vs

    Sophism. Does this need a criticism? Word as Real and Imagination as Primary, vs the parsimony of existence as real, and man slowly developing agency as he reframes his animal perceptions evolved at observable scale to correspondent consistent and coherent with post human scales.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-06 09:54:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048511790710185984

    Reply addressees: @wild_pomeg @SpitTheBluePill @SRCHicks @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1039867239170629633


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1039867239170629633

  • Since knowledge is one of the components of agency (power) then I can’t imagine

    Since knowledge is one of the components of agency (power) then I can’t imagine how any conflict exists. “Higher Phenomenon” needs a definition, which I expect translates to ‘dream state free association’. How would you define it?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-05 13:00:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048196303078019073

    Reply addressees: @MonsieurBouvard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048051660478717952


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048051660478717952

  • ( The universal reaction of women when you pick them up off the floor, smile, ho

    ( The universal reaction of women when you pick them up off the floor, smile, hold them there, and wait until they stop emoting. Sorta like the universal reaction of men to being touched and hugged by women. Throwing them over the shoulder is even more effective. Exasperates em.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-04 19:09:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047926615542513666

  • Agency Is Necessary for Sovereignty: Our Next Great Enterprise

    [A]gency is necessary for sovereignty otherwise one cannot self insure. If you cannot self insure then others must insure you out of self defense. If others must insure you then you are dependent upon them as a child upon a parent. You are not sovereign agent, and cannot reciprocally insure those with agency – and you especially cannot insure them against yourself. Western civilization specialized in the continuous production of agency. We emphasize sovereignty. But sovereignty is something we grant one another through reciprocity. Agency over the self exists or it doesn’t – independent of others. Stoicism attempts to produce agency. All other religions do not – they produce avoidance or escapism – with shintoism the closest peer looking backward rather than forward, and the original Buddhism the closest ambition – mindfulness but not agency. And Buddhism does not maintain the western charter demanding heroism, and speaking truth regardless of the consequences to the dominance (competence) hierarchy. If you master Propertarianism (natural law) you will have intellectual agency – all human experience is then explicable in operational terms, and the world coherent and comprehensible. If you master stoicism (self authoring) then you will develop intuitionistic and emotional agency. If you maintain diet and physical fitness – particularly team sports – you will develop physical agency. If you exchange sovereignty with others who do the same, then you will be sovereign. Rome had almost completed the development of a new religion when the Abrahamists worked diligently to undermine the great aristocratic civilizations. The lesson of Constantine is never let anyone other than a member of a noble family that has retained noble status in marriage hold office – ever. The lesson of the Abrahamic revolt against civilization, is that we must suppress all forms of supernaturalism, sophisms (pseudoratioalism), and pseudosciences. And the only way to do that is the use of the LAW: the organized use of force to suppress imposition of costs upon the private and common, existential and informational, by using the courts as a market for truth, thereby empowering all people to suppress falsehoods. Which leads us to our charter: —“Europeans do not know how to live unless they are engaged in some great enterprise. When this is lacking, they grow petty and feeble and their souls disintegrate.”—José Ortega y Gasset, Spanish Philosopher This is our next great enterprise. To rid humanity of the abrahamic falsehoods wither they be supernatural, sophistry, or pseudoscience. We have incrementally suppressed the evil in mankind by forcible domestication of genes and behavior in the ancient world and in the modern. The revolt against us in the ancient world brought about a dark age – we were far too tolerant. The abrahamic revolt against us in the modern world using collectivist pseudoscience and postmodern sophism, and the systematic use of pilpul and critique in the reputation destruction of our great civilization – a civilization that has dragged humanity out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of nature. This revolt against civilization, has not yet been stopped – we have been too tolerant. The most intolerant wins. We must rule by our law, out of self defense, and drag mankind kicking and screaming once again into transcendence of the gods we may yet be, in a universe hostile to all but gods. Transcendence by Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets in Everything: the continuous calculation of our ascent into godhood.