Curt Doolittle

Theme: Agency

  • So you failed them by failing to create at least a secure nuclear family with bo

    So you failed them by failing to create at least a secure nuclear family with both female and male role models so that unlike you they could successfully learn to form a secure stable family preparing their children for adulthood and the continued production of generations.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:41:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227346822760456198

    Reply addressees: @jenniferpierson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227345995912163328

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227345995912163328

  • Evidence is that (a) it’s damaging to children’s development (b) single mothers

    Evidence is that (a) it’s damaging to children’s development (b) single mothers produce most shooters and addicts, (c) externalize their insecurity and are irrationally overprotective prohibiting male involvement in the family – Fathers are better parents, b/c they remarry.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:36:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227345746669834240

    Reply addressees: @jenniferpierson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227344474281594880

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227344474281594880

  • Anyone who tries to deny others choice genetic purity, or impurity is mentally i

    Anyone who tries to deny others choice genetic purity, or impurity is mentally ill and not fit for motherhoood, fatherhood, or continued existence.

    We either have the right to self determination – or we have the right to extermination. So choose.

    I’m happy either way.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 16:17:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227265439400591360

  • FREE WILL AND DETERMINISM (DETERMINISTIC UNIVERSE) —“Could you say then that f

    FREE WILL AND DETERMINISM (DETERMINISTIC UNIVERSE)

    —“Could you say then that free will is a sort of emergent property of determinism?”—Andy Lunn

    Maybe I don’t understand that question enough.

    We have will. That’s a fact.

    We evolved for graceful failure in exercise of our will – so that is what we interpret as somtimes lacking free will.

    We evolved for incremental improvement of our knowledge, and then our will as a consequence.

    The degree to which we develop our will (ability) into agency (successful application) depends on ability, experience, training and general knowledge.

    So the question isn’t do we have free will, it’s that we evolved will and the capacity to develop agency with it. But we are limited by our knowledge. We do not appear to be otherwise limited simply because we are so good at building tools that extend our sense, perception and action.

    Now, within that context, if you mean, that without a deterministic universe (the scientific definition of determinism, not the sophomoric and philosophical definition), then yes, we could never develop agency because there would be no regularity, and without regularity no use for memory, and without memory there would be no use for will reason, or agency.

    So in that sense, yes. But only in that sense.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 14:26:00 UTC

  • “It is a disgrace to grow old through sheer carelessness before seeing what mann

    —“It is a disgrace to grow old through sheer carelessness before seeing what manner of man you may become by developing your bodily strength and beauty to their highest limit.” —Socrates

    (a reminder via John Papadopoulos)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 11:06:00 UTC

  • SANITY TEST —“I’ve adopted Hume’s argument that we should judge men’s sanity b

    SANITY TEST

    —“I’ve adopted Hume’s argument that we should judge men’s sanity by the extent their decisions appear determined by the external causes.”—Martin Štěpán

    Smart.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 09:50:00 UTC

  • “One of many duties that man has under P is that he is a warrior. My advice, hit

    —“One of many duties that man has under P is that he is a warrior. My advice, hit the range and train MMA. Sharpen your eye, harden the body. My take is that a martial art in it of it self is a pure and physical form a reciprocity. Under P, lying is a serious offense. Step into the gym, the mat never lies. Wrestling as you know was a huge part of Greco-Roman culture. It tests a man’s spirit and his resolve. And you get what you give. The more you sweat, the less you bleed. Stay honed. If your always ready, then you never have to get ready again.”—Torey Eric Anderson

    Be a man. Get fit ‘enough’. That’s all it takes.

    The first 20% of the training gives 80% of the value.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 09:28:00 UTC

  • WHAT ABOUT CAUSALITY IN THOUGHT? —“What do you call the interplay between huma

    WHAT ABOUT CAUSALITY IN THOUGHT?

    —“What do you call the interplay between human thoughts, if not “causality”?—Ben Quimby

    Auto-Association to Free Association to Focused Association.

    A chaotic (‘idiosyncratic’) accumulation of neural patterns using the grammar of the body (that’s our neural grammar), produces an equally idiosyncratic free associations, that due to thee regularity of the perceivable universe, and the regularity of the grammar of the body, converge within the limits of tolerance for error of the neural network.

    So just as causal density at the pre-particle level is chaotic within the limits of the grammar of particle formation, so is the causal density chaotic at the pre-rational neuro-associative level within the limits of the grammar of body’s sensory associative formation.

    Grammars (language) in everything. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 08:58:00 UTC

  • DEFINE: DETERMINISM All events, including human action, are ultimately determine

    DEFINE: DETERMINISM

    All events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to human thought (will). We categorize this limitation as constraining causality to realism (the universe exists) and naturalism (causes are independent of human thought and human thought has no influence on causality except through action). Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions.

    In science, determinism means that the universe demonstrates regularity and therefore we can identify general rules (laws of nature).

    I don’t pay much attention to philosophy – it’s mostly nonsense. If you can’t say it in testimony: math, logic, science, economics or law then it’s probably nonsense.

    And yeah. The vocabulary, grammar, and logic of economics includes psychology, sociology, politics, and group strategy.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 07:49:00 UTC

  • 6) The enemy uses False Promise of Freedom from the consequences of Nature’s Law

    6) The enemy uses False Promise of Freedom from the consequences of Nature’s Laws (genetics), to Bait those lacking agency into Hazard (harm), to generate conflict, that undermines our means of cooperation by markets, limited markets, and non-market cooperation.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 13:47:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226865386811019264

    Reply addressees: @NickJFuentes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226864645052542976

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @NickJFuentes 5)The enemy always seeks monopoly under the pretense of possible equality. Our people have always sought empirical markets that provide direction for those lacking agency, freedom and protection for those with some, liberty for those with more, and excellents for those with most.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1226864645052542976

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @NickJFuentes 5)The enemy always seeks monopoly under the pretense of possible equality. Our people have always sought empirical markets that provide direction for those lacking agency, freedom and protection for those with some, liberty for those with more, and excellents for those with most.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1226864645052542976