Democrats (liberals) are psychotic, solipsistic, and kleptocratic by nature. Once you grok it’s all genetics, that they’re all cognitively female, and that nothing can be done, there is no possibility for democracy to survive without market pressure on lower class reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 15:17:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1230511769342369792
Reply addressees: @Libertyworld
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1230498352439025666
CAUSALITY
by Brandon Hayes
—“The Conflict’s not so much race, but agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture. Race is just a convenient low resolution proxy that obscures the problem.” – Curt Doolittle
The claim isn’t that it’s a proxy for agency but it’s a proxy for this sequencing of phenomena: “agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture”
And replacing that higher resolution chain with “race” dilutes the information to be gleaned.
LESS re-ordering is most expedient. Where tooling and training will do separation and conflict can be avoided.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 11:20:00 UTC
(I thought it was general knowledge by now and part of his credibility. But I’ve followed him for years. )
The Conflict’s not so much race, but agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture. Race is just a convenient low resolution proxy that obscures the problem. https://twitter.com/JayMan471/status/1229855528052023301
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 22:14:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229891984350945281
–“I can’t be manipulated. I’m immune. I care what my wife thinks. That’s the only woman whose thinking i need to care about. And she’s happy with that monopoly on my care. And most women will be very happy with that monopoly of my care.”— Noah J Revoy
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 14:42:00 UTC
One more time. Three means of human coercion or more gently, weapons of influence.
The Physical:
Body and Movement
Using Force or Violence
The fear of harm or promise of defense.
By the Dominant or Established Male
The Material:
Resources and Opportunity
Using Bribe or Trade
The fear of loss of gains, or promise of gains
By the Brother, Ally, or Ascendant Male
The Social:
Cooperation and Insurance
Using Undermining or Advocacy
The fear of ostracization or promise of inclusion
By the female and especially dominant female
Personality:
Big5/6 Personality Traits with 10/12 Personality facets.
Where One Traits differs Dominance Expression.
Where all Facets differ by Gender Bias.
Where all personalities cluster by three types:
Dominant or Established Male.
Ascendant Male.
Female.
Gender:
Where sex is genetically determined and either male or female.
Where the brain evolves a dominant lateral, female, associative (wide association in the present) and longitudinal male a narrow, association over time and space).
Where the resulting brain structure favors temporal interpersonal emotion in the female necessary for child rearing, and intertemporal political analytic in the male necessary for holding territory, resources, females, and children from capture by competing males.
Where sexual preference is for the opposite sex, either male, female, but a small percentage of the population is subject to developmental defect in utero and can express almost any gender distribution.
Conflict:
Where developmental defect can cause failure to produce sufficient agency for self control.
Where genders demonstrate differences in self control by antisocial, disruptive or hostile behavior.
Where females demonstrate sexual, psychological(interpersonal), social(group), antisocial behavior, by continuous undermining and manipulation.
Where males demonstrate sexual and physical antisocial behavior by continuous harm to self, others, and property.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 14:19:00 UTC
WHY LOSS OF T?
Sedentary Living.
Not lifting heavy things.
Not competing with men.
Too much light, tv, monitor, not enough sleep.
Probably … estrogens everywhere.
—
(edit: By light, I didn’t mean sunlight (which is good), I meant, “Not getting enough sleep, because of tv, computer, etc”)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 13:42:00 UTC
Breakfast. Couple. Twenties. Man clearly lifts big and often. Women, very scary hot feminine. I feel need to do my thing (talk him up). Put my hand on his shoulder. Look at her “Now THIS is a man.” Look at him. “You know man, you’re looking good. But you make short guys like me feel like we can’t compete. It’ hard on us man. Mercy?” Him: “We’re all men”. (I am thrilled at this man-tier response). Me: “Well, you two need to have lots of kids. Do the world a favor. We need you to help us out.” (thankful laughter). I move on quickly without waiting for a response.
Breakfast. Another couple. “Damn you two are good looking. Do the rest of us a favor. Have lots of kids. Make the world a beautiful place”. Girl: (blush). I move on. Guy: to my back “I’ll get working on it”. (laughter)
Breakfast. Two little old ladies. (70’s or 80’s). Dressed for church. Me: “Well, I didn’t realize there were so many good looking women around here. How are you today?” (smiles) One: “I know your mother. I lived around the corner on — street.” Me: “And you’re talking to me? You can’t know her very well.” (more chit chat).
Attention, kindness, compliment, and humor are the cheapest means of contributing to the commons and it always works as long as you are dressed well and aren’t looking for confirmation or attention in return. It’s got to be charity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 14:36:00 UTC
THE LIMITS OF P IN MATE RELATIONSHIPS
—“I’ve falling in love with the phrase, “Baiting into hazard”. I use it on my wife almost daily. She looks at me funny. That’s ok, she can’t help it. It’s genetic.”—@EricLiford
[W]omen function by seduction of men by sex and affection; women by attention, cooperation, alliance, and insurance; and children by affection, information, care taking, dependency, and protection. So trying to get women to stop using seduction will just masculinize them and lose all their value as the central unit of family and social cooperation. The question isn’t whether women are seducing you, but whether the promise offered by their seduction is true. Just don’t lie to each other. It’s not complicated. You will find both men and women who make false promises in order to obtain discounts on acquisition of experience, information, cooperation, consumption, or capital. Men have only loyalty and strength women have only devotion and seduction. Let women be women. Encourage them to be women. The more seduction in the world the more wonderful it is. The only question is whether it’s a false promise or a truthful reciprocal, warrantied offer of exchange.
THE LIMITS OF P IN MATE RELATIONSHIPS
—“I’ve falling in love with the phrase, “Baiting into hazard”. I use it on my wife almost daily. She looks at me funny. That’s ok, she can’t help it. It’s genetic.”—@EricLiford
[W]omen function by seduction of men by sex and affection; women by attention, cooperation, alliance, and insurance; and children by affection, information, care taking, dependency, and protection. So trying to get women to stop using seduction will just masculinize them and lose all their value as the central unit of family and social cooperation. The question isn’t whether women are seducing you, but whether the promise offered by their seduction is true. Just don’t lie to each other. It’s not complicated. You will find both men and women who make false promises in order to obtain discounts on acquisition of experience, information, cooperation, consumption, or capital. Men have only loyalty and strength women have only devotion and seduction. Let women be women. Encourage them to be women. The more seduction in the world the more wonderful it is. The only question is whether it’s a false promise or a truthful reciprocal, warrantied offer of exchange.
—“…The concept of “obeying the commandments gives ultimate freedom” was the biggest oxymoron to me for most of my life. I have my merits, it should be good enough… Maybe this is just my inner /r, I have found a level of peace as I accepted my place in the machinery of life.”—Anne Summers
[I]t gives people an easy way of avoiding conflict over status and position so that they can work in harmony by simple rules. We just use sovereignty in western civ (scientific and legal) and take accountability for our actions, and supernaturalists use an excuse NOT to take accountability for their actions. In other words, sovereignty for the strong, and submission for the weak.