—“Unfathered and under-fathered people.”— Noah Revoy.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-16 00:42:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1802139649630142943
—“Unfathered and under-fathered people.”— Noah Revoy.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-16 00:42:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1802139649630142943
–“False humility is an abdication of responsibility.”– Noah Revoy (@NoahRevoy)
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-15 20:01:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1802068997141365238
–Q: CURT: “Any Conclusions So Far?”–
As expected, the general consensus is the lengthening of the duration of childhood and the delay of adulthood because of the delay of responsibility and the suppression of competition and resulting compromise and coordination, has delayed the formation of intersexual relationships past the point of maximum intersexual adaptation to one another. Hence the observed consequences in intersexual markets, marriage markets, reproduction, family, and family duration.
Reply addressees: @Cabbage_Salad_
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-14 15:29:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1801638071081046018
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1801563596335300689
GROUP STRATEGIES ARE SUBCONSCIOUS
—“…keep in mind that when @curtdoolittle talks about group evolutionary strategy he means the non-cognitive strategy of the gene pool itself, and leading to innate instincts, not the conscious intention of the gene pool. It’s a blind process following exploitable characteristics of reality each unique moment of unfolding evolution.”–WalterIII (@WalterIII)
They evolved. They are produced by indirection and suggestion, not direct exposition.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-13 00:20:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1801046972742217728
–Q: CURT: “A DEFINITION OF MINDFULNESS?”–
The goal of parenting, counseling, therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, religion, and ritual is broadly aimed at producing psychological well-being, emotional balance, and self regulation resulting in conscious control of your reaction to internal and internal stimuli: “mindfulness”.
Mindfulness is defined as the psychological process of bringing one’s attention to the present moment in a non-judgmental and accepting manner. This involves being aware of and attentive to the present experiences, thoughts, emotions, and sensations without trying to alter or avoid them. This insulates the individual from internal neuroticism and impulse, and external signalling by others or the environment.
This allows people in increasingly populous societies, with increasing divisions of labor, and diverging status and class, to provide non reactive negative reinforcement to signals and manipulation and attempts at emotional coercion. The result is lower conflict at the minimum and higher trust in the optimum.
Religion was traditionally the means of producing mindfulness though the Greeks (stoicism) and the Chinese (Confucianism) produced philosophy, the ability and training required limited its utility to males and the upper half of the population. The original Buddhism and Chinese ritualism deliberately and directly trained mindfulness. Abrahamic religion added the lower classes, and Indic religions most interestingly essentially a sub religion for each caste.
Every civilization produced some form of mindfulness as the recovery from the Bronze Age collapse restored trade and contact, and made groups aware of their differences, which was compounded by the depersonalisation of money and credit.
If you augment ritual and mindfulness with moral lessons you produce subconscious indoctrination absent the burden and fragility of reason and memory. Add public ritual, feast, festival, and sanctity ( funerals) and you have the first normative form of institutionalisation of a group evolutionary strategy.
We talk about religion because we don’t comprehend it’s function rather than it’s feeling and practice – but the goal of the institutionalization of social cooperation is mindfulness. So far only the stoics have produced a non false religion.
Religion failed. Philosophy failed. Ideology tried to replace it and is presently failing.
As such, we see demand for a non false religion as we have ended our tolerance for false religions and failed to produce a substitute or to invest in universal stoicism or an equivalent.
And women as more neurotic (negative feelings) need it more so than men.
The evidence of the mental health catastrophe, collapse of sexual cooperation, radical division, and political collapse are all more so than not the failure to produce mindfulness in a population and the re-wilding of generations as the false promise of individualism in which we have no common interest replaced the family as the central institution of society, in which we all share common interest.
Affections
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-13 00:12:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1801044845592481792
–Q: CURT: “A DEFINITION OF MINDFULNESS?”–
The goal of counseling, therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, religion, and ritual is broadly aimed at producing psychological well-being, emotional balance, and self regulation resulting in conscious control of your reaction to internal and internal stimuli: “mindfulness”.
Mindfulness is defined as the psychological process of bringing one’s attention to the present moment in a non-judgmental and accepting manner. This involves being aware of and attentive to the present experiences, thoughts, emotions, and sensations without trying to alter or avoid them. This insulates the individual from internal neuroticism and impulse, and external signalling by others or the environment.
This allows people in increasingly populous societies, with increasing divisions of labor, and diverging status and class, to provide non reactive negative reinforcement to signals and manipulation and attempts at emotional coercion. The result is lower conflict at the minimum and higher trust in the optimum.
Religion was traditionally the means of producing mindfulness though the Greeks (stoicism) and the Chinese (Confucianism) produced philosophy, the ability and training required limited its utility to males and the upper half of the population. The original Buddhism and Chinese ritualism deliberately and directly trained mindfulness. Abrahamic religion added the lower classes, and Indic religions most interestingly essentially a sub religion for each caste.
Every civilization produced some form of mindfulness as the recovery from the Bronze Age collapse restored trade and contact, and made groups aware of their differences, which was compounded by the depersonalisation of money and credit.
If you augment ritual and mindfulness with moral lessons you produce subconscious indoctrination absent the burden and fragility of reason and memory. Add public ritual, feast, festival, and sanctity ( funerals) and you have the first normative form of institutionalisation of a group evolutionary strategy.
We talk about religion because we don’t comprehend it’s function rather than it’s feeling and practice – but the goal of the institutionalization of social cooperation is mindfulness. So far only the stoics have produced a non false religion.
Religion failed. Philosophy failed. Ideology tried to replace it and is presently failing.
As such, we see demand for a non false religion as we have ended our tolerance for false religions and failed to produce a substitute or to invest in universal stoicism or an equivalent.
And women as more neurotic (negative feelings) need it more so than men.
The evidence of the mental health catastrophe, collapse of sexual cooperation, radical division, and political collapse are all more so than not the failure to produce mindfulness in a population and the re-wilding of generations as the false promise of individualism in which we have no common interest replaced the family as the central institution of society, in which we all share common interest.
Affections
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-13 00:12:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1801042845589028864
–Q: CURT: “A DEFINITION OF MINDFULNESS?”–
The goal of counseling, therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, religion, and ritual is broadly aimed at producing psychological well-being, emotional balance, and self regulation resulting in conscious control of your reaction to internal and internal stimuli: “mindfulness”.
Mindfulness is defined as the psychological process of bringing one’s attention to the present moment in a non-judgmental and accepting manner. This involves being aware of and attentive to the present experiences, thoughts, emotions, and sensations without trying to alter or avoid them. This insulates the individual from internal neuroticism and impulse, and external signalling by others or the environment.
This allows people in increasingly populous societies, with increasing divisions of labor, and diverging status and class, to provide non reactive negative reinforcement to signals and manipulation and attempts at emotional coercion. The result is lower conflict at the minimum and higher trust in the optimum.
Religion was traditionally the means of producing mindfulness though the Greeks (stoicism) and the Chinese (Confucianism) produced philosophy, the ability and training required limited its utility to males and the upper half of the population. The original Buddhism and Chinese ritualism deliberately and directly trained mindfulness. Abrahamic religion added the lower classes, and Indic religions most interestingly essentially a sub religion for each caste.
Every civilization produced some form of mindfulness as the recovery from the Bronze Age collapse restored trade and contact, and made groups aware of their differences, which was compounded by the depersonalisation of money and credit.
If you augment ritual and mindfulness with moral lessons you produce subconscious indoctrination absent the burden and fragility of reason and memory. Add public ritual, feast, festival, and sanctity ( funerals) and you have the first normative form of institutionalisation of a group evolutionary strategy.
We talk about religion because we don’t comprehend it’s function rather than it’s feeling and practice – but the goal of the institutionalization of social cooperation is mindfulness. So far only the stoics have produced a non false religion.
Religion failed. Philosophy failed. Ideology tried to replace it and is presently failing.
As such, we see demand for a non false religion as we have ended our tolerance for false religions and failed to produce a substitute or to invest in universal stoicism or an equivalent.
And women as more neurotic (negative feelings) need it more so than men.
The evidence of the mental health catastrophe, collapse of sexual cooperation, radical division, and political collapse are all more so than not the failure to produce mindfulness in a population and the re-wilding of generations as the false promise of individualism in which we have no common interest replaced the family as the central institution of society, in which we all share common interest.
Affections
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-13 00:12:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1801041943834636288
MINDFULNESS IS ….
The goal of counseling, therapy, religion, and ritual is broadly aimed at producing psychological well-being, emotional balance, and self regulation resulting in conscious control of your reaction to internal and internal stimuli.
Mindfulness is defined as the psychological process of bringing one’s attention to the present moment in a non-judgmental and accepting manner. This involves being aware of and attentive to the present experiences, thoughts, emotions, and sensations without trying to alter or avoid them. This insulates the individual from internal neuroticism and impulse, and external signalling by others or the environment.
This allows people in increasingly populous societies, with increasing divisions of labor, and diverging status and class, to provide non reactive negative reinforcement to signals and manipulation and attempts at emotional coercion. The result is lower conflict at the minimum and higher trust in the optimum.
Religion was traditionally the means of producing mindfulness thigh the Greeks (stoicism) and the Chinese (Confucianism) produced philosophy, the ability and training required limited its utility to males and the upper half of the population. The original Buddhism and Chinese ritualism deliberately and directly trained mindfulness. Abrahamic religion added the lower classes, and Indic religions most interestingly essentially a sub religion for each caste.
Every civilization produced some form of mindfulness as the recovery from the Bronze Age collapse restored trade contact made groups aware of their differences. and added the depersonalisation of money and credit.
If you augment ritual and mindfulness with moral lessons you produce subconscious indoctrination absent the burden and fragility of reason and memory. Add public ritual, feast, festival, and sanctity ( funerals) and you have the first normative form of institutionalisation of a group evolutionary strategy.
We talk about religion but the goal is mindfulness. So far only the stoics have produced a non false religion.
Religion failed. Philosophy failed. Ideology tried to replace it and is presently failing.
As such, we see demand for a non false religion as we have ended our false religions and failed to produce a substitute or to invest in universal stoicism or an equivalent.
And women need it more so than men.
The evidence of the mental health catastrophe, collapse of sexual cooperation, radical division, and political collapse are all more so than not the failure to produce mindfulness in a population and the re-wilding of generations as the false promise of individualism in which we have no common interest replaced the family as the central institution of society, in which we all share common interest.
Affections
CD
Reply addressees: @Hist__ @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-12 23:04:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1801027727631212545
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800995553649529245
–“Q: DOES THE WORLD OPERATE BY RATIONAL MEANS?”–
Great topic. (RL always brings up good topics.) 😉
In economics we claim human behavior is rational if you understand the information available to the individual, the time he or she has to decide, and the suite of incentives. But what we mean by ‘rational’ is that it’s ‘rationally explainable’.
This is why the common law, courtroom, and jury work. If presented with sufficient information to understand the individual’s state of mind, the jury can decide on the ability, information, and timeliness of the necessity of the person to act in relation to the amount of due diligence a reasonable (average for the individual’s ability) person would perform in order to not err or commit a crime.
In that sense the world is rationally explainable. That does not mean that people act logically or reasonably as if they had the ability, knowledge, and incentives that we have in hindsight.
This is why for example, in the physical sciences we try to predict by producing deliberate tests, and why in the social sciences we try to explain by collecting information that was not deliberately constructed to prevent the problems of demonstrated vs reported behavior (why behavioral science is sh-t). Likewise with logic, all logic is only falsificationary. Not justificationary. Meaning if something is false it’s more certain than something that is a truth candidate since all premises and all conclusions from them are contingent. (That set of sentences is probably something the world needs to understand when they make scientific or unscientific claims.)
The lesson here is that as a participant in the world, people appear to be irrational because we lack the knowledge of their ability, frame, knowledge, experience, and incentives.
But as an observer of the world (behavioral economists), the world is, both individually and in the aggregate, acting rationally in response to the degree of information and ability to make use of it in the time they must act.
So the question is, just as we have taught people enough science to grasp the general rules by which the universe functions, and in doing so raised their demonstrated intelligence substantially, if we taught people enough behavioral science (in the sense of behavioral economics, not the sh-t that passes for psychology and sociology and political science) then we would see the same increase in demonstrated intelligence in the personal, social, economic, and political world that we did in the physical worlds.
This mirrors my suggestion that religion was cheap and stoicism(philosophy) was costly. Mythology was cheap but history was costly. Morals were cheap but laws were costly. illiteracy was cheap but literacy was costly. The rather odd collection of thousands of discrete rules was cheap but the few general rules of science were costly. Fitness in the farm world was cheap, but fitness in the modern world is costly.
In other words, we must educate the body, the soul, the mind, and the memory despite the cost, if we want to make whole people capable of modern society and preserving it without the gradual descent into devolution we’ve seen emerge over the past seventy years – and which threatens another dark age of ignorance, superstition, and muslim-level dysgenia.
The Deficit of Mindfulness is Our Fault. Like many follies of the 20th century we presumed our reduction of scarcity and the provision of plenty, removed all constraints on mankind – presuming human nature included the morals and traditions we had so costly and deliberately manufactured over the millennia to make it possible for people to act as close to ‘as one’ as possible without human super-predators killing and eating one another.
The problem is fixable.
And we know how to fix it.
Or at least, fix enough of us that the problem is minimized.
Which is the best humans can ever do. 😉
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-11 19:56:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800618102129905664
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800571599327773096
Yes, I think what you’re saying is that for a woman sexual engagement, is an expression of vulnerability that is easily suppressed by external anxieties. And that asking a man to achieve that level of vulnerability takes some imagination, provided by the example you stated.
I guess I am having trouble testing that against the evidence. If you said that women’s intuitions in these matters follow a normal distribution and you’re describing one end of it.
I mean, I’ve gained weight since I was ill and turned the corner on age, but I would happily have walked down the street naked and shouting at the top of my lungs if I had something worth saying in such a forum. ;). And I’ve certainly met women (most of them) who were far more aggressive in sexual pursuit than I was. And today the evidence is that the the fk-boys are vastly outnumbered by the number of fk-girls. As such as is usual, male regulation is self regulation because of the risks, while female regulation is provided entirely by other women and pandora is out of the box so to speak without regulation by other women.
Now I can understand that marriage suppresses female interest more so than male interest. And I can understand that marriage and children suppress female capacity to maintain marketability. And I understand as well or more than most the female need for novelty and novel attention vs males. And as such that would drive insecurity. But I’m having difficulty envisioning what I interpret as the extreme position you illustrated. And I’m assuming this is a projection rather than a generalization – because the generalization doesn’t fit the data (also doesn’t fit my experience).
Thanks
Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-10 23:20:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800307114465722368
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1800299181208469746