Theme: Agency

  • You are afraid of conflict. You have no responsibilities. You have no responsibi

    You are afraid of conflict.
    You have no responsibilities.
    You have no responsibility because you have no competency.
    People with competency accumulate responsibilities and so must decide, manage, and govern.
    You are courteous because you are afraid, and because you have no responsibilities because you have no competency.
    I speak as someone responsible, who must bear the cost of conflict, and be unfraid of conflict, in order to fulfill those responsibilities with the competencies I”ve developed.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 04:34:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627889561924784134

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627887893787344897

  • I don’t make jokes about physically disabled people, only those mentally disable

    I don’t make jokes about physically disabled people, only those mentally disabled by their own volition. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 01:51:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627848496748306433

    Reply addressees: @Ston14John @Chris2_0_0_9 @LPNational @mtgreenee

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627833185240338432


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    You have no idea. I can rattle this stuff off the top of my head rapidly and endlessly, while periodically interjecting long arcs of historical causality across comparative civilizations, and taking frequent side trips into group differences in methods of argument and deception, while trying to play foosball, and occasionally sipping a scotch – without dropping a beat.

    (Well, as long as my allergies aren’t bothering me anyway.)

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1627833185240338432

  • THE NONSENSE OF THE AGE OF EMPOWERMENT Every generation is worst with the most r

    THE NONSENSE OF THE AGE OF EMPOWERMENT
    Every generation is worst with the most recent the worst of all: the least disciplined, least trained, least knowledgeable, least competent, offering opinion with conviction that is unwarranted by all of the above.
    It’s not empowerment. It’s infantilization.
    You’re not oppressed.
    You’re being domesticated.
    And you need to be.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 00:36:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627829553035968512

  • Don’t ask a thing that feels first and then reasons only in desperation to reaso

    Don’t ask a thing that feels first and then reasons only in desperation to reason first despite the roaring crowd of emotion. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 03:39:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627513176139915264

    Reply addressees: @Paulp6363

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627509793341550592

  • (Correct.) EVOLUTIONARY ORIGINS OF SEX DIVISION OF PERCEPTION COGNITION AND LABO

    (Correct.)
    EVOLUTIONARY ORIGINS OF SEX DIVISION OF PERCEPTION COGNITION AND LABOR

    Formal:
    1. Reproductive division of evolutionary computation
    2. Sex division of labor in evolutionary computation (egg:mass-prey -vs- sperm: velocity-predator)
    3. Bilateralization causes demand for lateral priority
    4. Hemispheric priority by division of labor
    5. Hemispheric specialization (prey, predator)
    6. Hemispheric specialization (in-time, over time)
    7. Sex division of labor in time (female, male)
    8. Female in time, consumption, minimization of external responsibility – vs- male over time, capitalization, maximization of external responsibility.
    9. Female internal empathizing and consumption in time -vs- male external systematizing over time in acquisition of resources
    10. Female demand generation (internal) -vs- male supply provision (external) in exchange for sex.
    11. Female specialization in harm/care, equality/equity, male generalization in harm/care, reciprocity/proportionality, loyalty/hierarchy, disgust/purity (defense).

    So yes, it’s all about sex. 😉

    Evolution finds a way to calculate what it has without knowledge of what it must calculate.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 03:20:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627508359837499393

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627468253479182336

  • Adam, (all) RE: “The Neuroticism Obsession vs the Oppression Obsession” 1) The m

    Adam, (all)
    RE: “The Neuroticism Obsession vs the Oppression Obsession”

    1) The majority of studies, (and my own research) suggest that the incentive to pursue conspiracy theories originates in feelings of alienation and being out of control in life – because they are true. As such conspiracy theories are means of self-sedation. And that sedation can evolve into an obsession – or what’s a form of addiction.

    2) Feeling out of control, paranoia and self-sedation is consistent across sex differences with conspiracy theories on the right, and male, and oppression theories on the left and female. (Sexes differ in means of expressing antisocial behavior. And the variation in cognitive and emotional dimorphism is evident in the distribution of biases and behaviors in the population.)

    3) The diagnosis of Narcissism is being delegitimized in the vernacular. First, it’s natural for people to disagree. Natural for people to place higher confidence in their bias over that of others. But more so because it is a coping mechanism (means of self-sedation) against developmental challenges or trauma.

    4) So while the claim of narcissism (largely a male behavior) is common, the evidence is that the female oppression narrative is much more endemic, females have and express higher trait neuroticism, magical thinking, and hysteria, and female mental illness and obsession with oppression narratives are one of the most significant mental health crises of our age.

    The question is only why conspiracy theories and oppression narratives are necessary for sedation in a population, and whether the increase is material or one of visibility, and whether it’s caused by alienation isolation and a failure to replace religious indoctrination as the traditional prophylactic with some substitute such as stoicism or Buddhism (and physical fitness for that matter).

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 14:10:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627309634837966849

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626632891307261965

  • ANSWER –“how much can you trust a feeling?”– 1) All emotions are reactions to

    ANSWER
    –“how much can you trust a feeling?”–

    1) All emotions are reactions to change in state of ‘something of value to you’ (an asset, a demonstrated interest) whether potential gain, gain, retention, loss, potential loss. And whether the form of our body, action, time, habit, knowledge, relationship, thing, association, organization, commons … anything we have an interest in. (interest in the legal sense, not in the mental sense.)

    2) We may correctly or incorrectly interpret the legitimacy of our interest in (right to) what it is that we value whose state is, or may change.

    3) We may correctly or incorrectly morally and ethically interpret the legitimacy of ours or others’ interest in (right to) what is changing.

    4) In the sense that you ask the question, ‘Can we trust our emotions?’ we can trust that they are caused by something or other that we believe has changed state (most often our status or self-image than anything else, since status and self-image largely determine access to opportunities), we cannot trust whether these emotions are ‘true, useful, ethical, moral’ practical, or selfish, petty, childish, immature, antisocial, criminal, or evil.

    5) We are different from chimps (and they are not good, kind, or nice or virtuous creatures by any means) largely because we have developed sufficient agency (self-reflection and impulse suppression) so that we don’t retaliate against anything but that we must retaliate against given our environment.

    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 06:58:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627200873561563138

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627158909885747206

  • The problem is, that there is no evidence that marriage (pairing off) is not the

    The problem is, that there is no evidence that marriage (pairing off) is not the competitive and evolutionary, optimum. It appears to be. I can’t find any counter-examples. Any economist, especially any behavioral economist, should have no problem explaining why. What happens when there is a surplus of unmarried (unpaired) men?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 04:58:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627170671603200003

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627165199206588417

  • SUPPORTING TESTIMONY: 1) I took advice from my grandfather and started taking po

    SUPPORTING TESTIMONY:
    1) I took advice from my grandfather and started taking power naps at about 40. I’m over 60 and I still use it to restore cognitive ability.
    2) When I taught creativity I used the same strategy of filling the shelves of your mind, then sleeping, resting, or even playing. You don’t have to work at auto-association – your brain will do that for you. In other words, “shower and driving” insights can be ‘farmed’ systematically just as easily as physical strength can develop in sports.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-18 18:08:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627007283963080711

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626999119255580672

  • I can predict many things when it comes to limits. Gostrategy, Economy, Money, S

    I can predict many things when it comes to limits. Gostrategy, Economy, Money, Science, and Technology.
    But when it comes to the direction that the windsock of the common population in democratic countries will do, I claim I have no idea whatsoever.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-17 20:34:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626681628771725313

    Reply addressees: @Qibonacci @TheAutistocrat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626680395747000320