Theme: Agency

  • VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE) (Continued ….) 9) Here i

    VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
    (Continued ….)

    9) Here is what will ruin your day (‘because it ruined mine). Men achieve status through the accumulation of responsibility (capitalization). Women achieve status by evasion of responsibility (hyperconsumption). Just as there is no human behavior that cannot be reduced to the pursuit of acquisition, retention, or consumption, there is no sex difference in behavior that cannot be reduced to the search for irresponsibility and consumption IN time vs responsibility and capitalization OVER time. Likewise, women are devoted IN time, but men are loyal OVER time. In this sense, this is why relationships are returning to pre-agrarian serial monogamy with frequent ‘cheating’. So in abstract terms “women are eschewing political responsibility for personal hyperconsumption.” This is burning down civilizational capital in a genetic and cultural bonfire. But what are we to do? (Sweden,Denmark while we can afford it).
    10) Civilization depends on very complex accumulated ‘technologies’ of cooperation that provide us with Pareto hierarchies and nash distributions. We have just thrown a wrench in evolution. And while we’re taking the decline in population worldwide as a good thing given the energy cost per capita of industrial-age mankind, the fact is that our entire way of life is going to collapse if we do not find a way to adapt to this ‘wrench in the works’: the breakdown of intersexual markets, due to the breakdown of intersexual value.

    Great chat.
    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 03:47:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414397465063424

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414229885927429


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUy6CU_tLLQ

    NOTES:
    1) Adulthood: Most civs, a woman is an adult when she has children (is responsible). Still true in some of the Catholic countries.
    2) Male Protectionism: We don’t have the capacity to suppress…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1630414229885927429

  • (Lament: The Current Sex Conflict ) 1) I love women (maybe more than I should lo

    (Lament: The Current Sex Conflict )
    1) I love women (maybe more than I should lol) I certainly managed to accumulate more ex’s than I should. I mean. I’m average.

    2) I was raised with the put women-on-a-pedestal principle. I like that principle just fine, thanks.

    3) As a bit of… https://twitter.com/TheMcGloneCode/status/1630359569028337668

  • (Lament: The Current Sex Conflict ) 1) I love women (maybe more than I should lo

    (Lament: The Current Sex Conflict )
    1) I love women (maybe more than I should lol) I certainly managed to accumulate more ex’s than I should. I mean. I’m average.

    2) I was raised with the put women-on-a-pedestal principle. I like that principle just fine, thanks.

    3) As a bit of an aspie, women have extraordinary value in explaining people and their behavior when I’m confused (ignorant). πŸ˜‰

    4) I have had female friends for years, and valued them. But then I’m ‘allergic’ to women friends who might have an interest (I find it creepy because I perceive it as manipulation even if it’s genuine interest). But in truth I’m kind of oblivious. πŸ˜‰

    5) Unless the woman was an employee, I probably wouldn’t spend time with her without my wife. If she is an employee then I have no problem at all, as long as it’s in public. (My assistants, that’s a different thing. It’s unavoidable. Executive Assistants are ‘work wives’ and I use them to manage me, and who has access to me. But married assistants with children I’ve found are pretty safe.)

    THE SAD BIT
    So my problem here is that I like women, being married to women, working with women, and having women friends, and being friends with wives of my friends. And this whole war-of-the sexes for destructive ideological purposes is just, well SAD. πŸ™


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 00:22:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630362842305110017

  • MY VIDEO SERIES ON THE MIND (Beginning of the Foundations Course) Here are my vi

    MY VIDEO SERIES ON THE MIND
    (Beginning of the Foundations Course)
    Here are my videos on the foundations of cognitive science, through the vision system. I haven’t yet produced perception: world modeling, or consciousness yet. But at that point:
    (a) you should understand how simple the brain is.
    (b) you should understand what’s required to produce artificial general intelligence
    (c) you will be able to understand and compare different artificial intelligence claims, models, and products.
    (d) and this will dramatically reduce your ‘fear’ of AI.
    (e) and then how any ‘bad’ AI must be DESIGNED to be bad, and can’t evolve to be bad on its own.
    My goal is to give you an operational paradigm vocabulary and logic of consciousness. If you want to understand my work

    1) Introduction
    https://t.co/y8AHr4B6sU
    2) Vocabulary: Using The Geometric Frame of Reference
    https://t.co/hEpgK2NoTa
    3) Gross Anatomy of The Nervous System
    https://t.co/DUU8hDpkOX
    4) The Cortex
    https://t.co/oEejtHvyLn
    5) Neurons
    https://t.co/1exUwZpQUf
    6) Columns
    https://t.co/YVMD4gbajw
    7) Vision
    https://t.co/eaWOHvbOz9
    (more to follow)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-27 21:53:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630325359945105411

  • Free will questions only whether we have the choice to act morally or not, and t

    Free will questions only whether we have the choice to act morally or not, and therefore are accountable for our actions to others. It doesn’t propose anything else, and the concept has no meaning outside of that original question.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-27 03:59:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630054871108919300

    Reply addressees: @vivayo_can @ScottAdamsSays @elonmusk

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630050351880736770

  • The question is, why am I so knowledgeable, and why I’m so correct, even if corr

    The question is, why am I so knowledgeable, and why I’m so correct, even if correctness is painful. The answer is I just work at being knowledgeable more so than most people wish to or even can.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-26 21:57:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629963896483205123

    Reply addressees: @Jkb358

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629962240005898240

  • Sure. Like many see this problem today and aren’t heeded. But that presumes huma

    Sure. Like many see this problem today and aren’t heeded. But that presumes humanity has the general capacity to see and heed what they don’t intuitionistically see interpret understand predict and heed. They don’t. The faction that was right but fails always virtue signals. But why were they the faction that failed?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-26 19:59:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629934117063204864

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629931072585646081

  • THE ANTI-FEMINIST TAKE? –“Were you oppressed? Or were the vast majority of wome

    THE ANTI-FEMINIST TAKE?
    –“Were you oppressed? Or were the vast majority of women irrational, impulsive, emotional, selfish, greedy, hyper-consuming, attention-seeking, virtue signaling, seditious, treasonous, socially poisonous whores, unfit to raise the children (boys) necessary to create the discipline, selflessness, capitalization, and commons necessary for society, culture, and civilization? I mean, look at western women today. They’re the freest to express themselves in civilizational history, and demonstrate every day that women are, after all, Pandoras – the origin of all the world’s evils?”–

    See? We can take the extreme position too.

    Men and women domesticated each other into the Pareto and Nash optimums for both, which produced the best for the most – and there is no alternative unless we develop artificial wombs. And in that case, it turns out, that men are better parents than women, and women are often better workers – at least where strength isn’t involved. So why not have men gravitate to capitalizing by raising families, societies, and polities and women work for their consumption? I mean. That turns into a cycle of history, doesn’t it? Returning us to our original form?

    The point is that you can’t hyper-consume without hyper-capitalizing, which together cancel one another out, ending hyper-everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-26 00:21:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629637832825241600

  • JAY Did a lot of work on this subject. Across recorded history. Simple version:

    JAY
    Did a lot of work on this subject. Across recorded history. Simple version: through mindfulness, habit, ritual, hyper-socialization, and social construction of non-aggression. Religion is, as are most means of female magical thinking (woo woo) means of sedating neuroticism (worry), and empathizing (short-term prediction of individual’s emotions) instead of systematizing (longer-term prediction of groups and the world). Religion spreads via women for this reason. So do horoscopes, crystals, and all other ‘woo woo’ comforts. Complex version is that this behavior turns out to be necessary for extending a nervous system to track offspring by intution by auto associative prediction in time.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-25 23:19:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629622104478961666

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629482104684773378

  • I would be successful in most countries because I have been successful in multip

    I would be successful in most countries because I have been successful in multiple countries. Any country where I wouldn’t be successful would be due to the single criteria of sufficient corruption that anyone’s success would be limited by barrier to entry. πŸ˜‰ That is why commerce departments in governments from other countries have asked me to open offices in their countries. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 17:52:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629177422535962627

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629174777880403971