RT @whatifalthist: The internet has firmly proved human nature is not fundamentally good
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 22:39:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639396450583887872
Theme: Agency
-
Bo, the pattern of metaphysical (unconscious, presumtions) across those choices
Bo, the pattern of metaphysical (unconscious, presumtions) across those choices isn’t so … good. I mean, like German art, or Russian literature, it’s dark, where man is a victim of forces, and absent heroic optimism, primacy of man over the gods and nature, and the faustian…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:09:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639374012999520263
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639322760567455752
-
It creates hope. The only thing we can do is attempt to eliminate the need for h
It creates hope.
The only thing we can do is attempt to eliminate the need for hope, and instead, redirect us to wonder.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 19:32:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638624788070682624
Reply addressees: @Dylboz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638623131471605760
-
Me 49, her 23. Worked just fine. More her idea than mine. If a woman chooses and
Me 49, her 23. Worked just fine. More her idea than mine. If a woman chooses and is happy with her choice that’s all that matters.
Besides JFG: you’re f—ing charming. lol 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 19:10:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638619092247519246
Reply addressees: @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638609959171530784
-
Genetic Class determine the differences in subsequent class sizes. This is reduc
Genetic Class determine the differences in subsequent class sizes. This is reducible to Neoteny+ IQ(Ability)+Symmetry(health/fitness)+Self Regulation(behavior).
Genetic Class (neoteny +/- load) (Sexual Market Value)
Social Class (SxMV+Social market value)
Economic Class… https://t.co/ZSOXnPFLls
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 18:18:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638606193512923136
Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis @enigma3078
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638600459287166977
-
Genetic Class determine the differences in subsequent class sizes. This is reduc
Genetic Class determine the differences in subsequent class sizes. This is reducible to Neoteny+ IQ(Ability)+Symmetry(health/fitness)+Self Regulation(behavior).
Genetic Class (neoteny +/- load) (Sexual Market Value)
Social Class (SxMV+Social market value)
Economic Class (SMV+SoMV+Economic market value)
Political Class (SoMV+EMV+Political market value)
Genetic Class is readily visible in appearance and behavior – almost never changes
Social Class is readily visible in appearance and behavior – it rarely changes.
Economic and classes under markets are highly noisy (variable) – it changes often but mostly rotation up and down from the middle and lower middle. But it is highly dependent upon social and genetic class.
Political Class (talking) under democracy is random but still existent. And usually depends on genetic, social, and economic class.
Read Paul Fussel’s “Class”. It was and remains the best work on the ‘natural classes’ we have yet seen and nothing comes even close.
Below is the diagram I use for explaining not only the classes but their biases and elites, resulting in the European trifunctional competition between elites for influence over the population.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 18:18:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638606193324072971
-
I wonder how much of our knowledge – meaning those of us with sufficient IQ, suf
I wonder how much of our knowledge – meaning those of us with sufficient IQ, sufficient disagreeablness, who are both informed, and have life experience, is due to having the TIME as well as the interest to maintain a body of knowledge to observe the patterns and recommend the…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 13:11:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638528738576023552
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638523625379889152
-
WS: I don’t see evidence they NEED different things. I see evidence they require
WS: I don’t see evidence they NEED different things. I see evidence they require mindfulness to different degrees. And that man has discovered a great variety of means of producing mindfulness. Of those means, mythological appears to be the worst other than drugs and alcohol. The challenge I see at present, is our failure to produce and invest in (the high cost of training into) a non-false consistency across ‘religion(feels), philosophy(reason), science(evidence)’ that produces that mindfulness. If that means ‘we need different things’ in the form of narrative, reason, and evidencde(calculation) then that’s true. If it means we need non-correspondence in any one of them that doesn’t appear to be so. In fact, it’s the source of all horrors of man that I know of.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 12:38:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638520487910277123
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638516141730455555
-
WS: I don’t see evidence they NEED different things. I see evidence they require
WS: I don’t see evidence they NEED different things. I see evidence they require mindfulness to different degrees. And that man has discovered a great variety of means of producing mindfulness. Of those means, mythological appears to be the worst other than drugs and alcohol. The challenge I see at present, is our failure to produce and invest in (the high cost of training into) a non-false consistency across ‘religion(feels), philosophy(reason), science(evidence)’ that produces that mindfulness. If that means ‘we need different things’ in the form of narrative, reason, and evidencde(calculation) then that’s true. If it means we need non-correspondence in any one of them that doesn’t appear to be so. In fact, it’s the source of all horrors of man that I know of.
Reply addressees: @William68332190 @ContraFabianist @digitildream
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 12:38:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638520487809515520
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638516141730455555
-
Agreed on TE. You’re rather obviously correct on variation. Neoteny is ignored a
Agreed on TE.
You’re rather obviously correct on variation.
Neoteny is ignored and meaningful and still relative.
Econ of behavior does suggest some TRENDS.
Some points in history of 70k to 20k BP might have been rather pleasant given the novelty of man against the ignorance of…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 01:42:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638355446867083264
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638222207662039040