Theme: Agency

–“Q: CURT; You often say women don’t chose the right mate if they’re not socialized properly. Can you explain that more thoroughly please?”–

Great question.

Women are attracted to what they understand as dominance expression (safety). The problem is teaching women what forms of dominance expression (productive competency, demonstrated responsibility) results in the formation or relationships, marriages, families, and successful offspring given the time taken for high investment parenting necessary for the preservation of the returns on high trust for western civilization.

In the absence of that training, women will follow the most primitive mating impulse that provides the shortest term attention, stimulation, status, and gratification – in other words, female mating instincts are contrary to responsibility because female instincts are contrary to responsibility – until they have children – and only for her children.

The female instict when not directed to the responsibility for her children leads always and everywhere to saturation of the marketplace with her demand for self image and status seeking by hyperconsumption, hyperattention (also hyperconsumpption) and hypergamy (also hyperconsumption) and the evasion of all responsibility for the commons (also hyperconsumption.)

So her problem is not falling into seduction by short term dominance expression for reproductive survival in natural selection in absence of male investment, and instead for longer term durability for quality of continuous male investment under civilizational selection (markets). Similar to how men must learn to work, build institutions governments, and armies instead of raid.

In other words evolution provides women with a fallback instinct in case civilization collapses. But without culture, norms, traditions and institutions, evolution of people within civilization will never survive or evolve within civilization. In other words genetic instinct for survival by natural selection hasn’t caught up with trained intuiition for survival in civilizational selection.

In other words evolution provides a fallback instinct in case civilization collapses, but without culture, norms, traditions and institutions, evolution of people within civilization will never evolve within civilization.

In other words genetic instinct for survival by natural selection hasn’t caught up with trained intuiition for survival in civilizational selection.

So in our current mouse utopia, women are causing civilizational collapse, that exists only because of the disintegration of the traditional (not nuclear) family, labor mobility, the delay of reproduction into the 30s due to education, higher eduction, and employment for the purpose of hyperconsumption.

The males act accordingly, and as such a few males make only opportunisticaly and not reproductively, and male NEED for responsibility greater than themselves never develops, even if they don’t impose hyperconsumptive costs on the commons.

We are dying for the same reason mice do in mouse utopia.

Cheers

HOW DOES HOMOSEXUALITY PLAY INTO EVOLUTION?

Ugh. I don’t really want to go into this subject even though I do understand the issue. But ‘pubic service calls’.

So:

In general, all humans develop probabilistically, starting with genes, but later dependent upon the environment in the womb.

As such, humans are born within probabilistic limits that either cause miscarriage, or not – and not according to an optimum plan. In fact human adaptive variation requires variation between individuals.

As such, we are all of us a mixture of female and male sex organ development AND the LATER cognitive emotional (brain) development by the division of feminine empathizing and male systematizing traits.

So there is a developmental relation but not necessarily dependence upon the physical by the instinctual and personality traits.

At present (a) homosexuality tends to run in families (b) it tends to occur after the first child (c) there may or may not be some environmental trigger that impedes development (d) women(females) are sexually plastic and men less so.

So homosexuality is a birth (developmental) defect that isn’t severe enough to cause a miscarriage. The reason it doesn’t isn’t yet known, but is likely due to the late maturity of these cognitive and emotional processes vs the early development of the physical.

A study of the differences between early and late births – even by so much as days – provides some fascinating insight into late stage development of the brain, emotions, personality, and yes, even handedness.

It isn’t clear that in history – at least prior to agrarianism, that sex preference was relevant enough to reproduction to select against. It isn’t clear if it evolved during agrarianism. It isn’t clear if there is a viral, bacterial, chemical, immunological difference in modernity that is having some effect.

I suspect we will know in the next thirty years. All that’s preventing it now is the willingness to perform the research.

And I am fairly sure it will be detectable and possibly correctable in utero or post partum within the same period of time.

I hope this helps.
Cheers

Reply addressees: @OtonielFilho5 @bierlingm