RT @NoahRevoy: Passivity is unmasculine.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-13 21:55:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702078686181081292
RT @NoahRevoy: Passivity is unmasculine.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-13 21:55:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702078686181081292
Dude. I have, for the entirety of my life, been accused of being an artificial intelligence because of my lack of such petty emotions and my autistic logical sensibilities.
Do you know what all of us behavioral scientists know?
That you just used projection.
It’s evidence of the…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-13 21:40:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702074776712319286
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702044860428308711
Classical liberalism emerged as t he agency of men increased, and especially the agency of men after the Industrial Revolution. Because male agency increased and male criminality increased, and because male criminality (antisocial behavior) is easily visible (and dangerous) our laws (largely) kept up with the incremental suppression of male antisocial behavior.
Unfortunately, the female, feminine, abrahamic, Marxist method of warfare by undermining, reputation destruction, of individuals and institutions, and the susceptibility to social construction of false promises that bait individuals and groups into hazards (devolution are consequences), was only enabled by the false promise of the end of scarcity and the europhoria it created ini the progressives and marxists (leftists) where they cast their previous poverty as oppression rather than scarcity domestication and necessity given their pervasive criminality. And as this feminine means of warfare was suppressed on the individual level with laws against shrilling etc (being Karen) under the common law, it was not suppressed in institutions because it is the means by which the Christian religion was spread and defeated the natural religion of european peoples.
So we are in a period of time where we are experiencing for the first time since the late Roman Empire, or the fall of Sparta, the results of introversion of feminine interests, and feminine men’s of antisocial behavior into the commons, economy, and polity. But we have not yet restored and expanded the law to suppress feminine antisocial behavior (seduction into false promises, undermining canceling, etc) because we haven’t had to since the Greco-Roman age, because the church like the marxist-postmodernist-woke hid behind the plausibility deniability that they have moral rather than parasitic intentions.
I worked very hard on legal constitutional and policy reform to counter this, and have done the work to do so. But only after making a special dispensation for the tolerance of Christian superstition.
And yes this is the correct answer.
Reply addressees: @Meritocrating
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 21:43:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701713131569860608
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701700579406512221
Planning’s a different issue, as you suggest.
Longitudinal fast over time processing and systematizing vs lateral (bihemispheric) slow in time processing and empathizing.
Systematizing vs empathizing is the observable expression of sex differences.
Over time vs in time is the evolutionary cause of that observation.
Brain organization, especially hemispheric (predator(actions), prey(world)) and resulting bias by time results in those sex differences.
They are incompatible divisions of labor (meaning you can’t do both with the energy and categorization options available.)
Neurological division of labor results from neurological economic constraints, sex differences in motivation necessary, sex division of labor.
Will provide further clarification if needed.
Reply addressees: @BristolBen @emilyeye @bejbiewelcia @datepsych @SteveStuWill @cait_CST
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 21:33:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701710646411141120
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701704329491816513
Pull up http://Perplexity.ai, or google scholar. Search for “sex differences in trait neuroticism” (worry, mental agency).
Search for “men think in boxes”. read or watch a video about it.
From just those two alone, you should understand.
If you haven’t been married and…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 18:30:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701664601832636490
Reply addressees: @emilyeye @bejbiewelcia @datepsych @SteveStuWill @cait_CST
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701662832947777575
Pull up https://t.co/CePoVaTV23, or google scholar. Search for “sex differences in trait neuroticism” (worry, mental agency).
Search for “men think in boxes”. read or watch a video about it.
From just those two alone, you should understand.
If you haven’t been married and discovered that this is the primary difference between women and men then you will learn it rather quickly and you can search for the vast pool of comedy and commentary about it.
I always wonder why people question me accusatorially rather than just asking the moral question in advance.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 18:30:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701664601748787201
Haida argues that not all people do that. And he is correct. In our organization we have learned trait disagreeableness rapidly decreases the tendency to react to social signals.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 17:01:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701642117410365926
Reply addressees: @dindu_nuffin420 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701633671852142933
We are all subject to interrupt driven response under certain circumstances, from the blink response to pain to status threat to mere disapproval etc. The question is where on that spectrum does reason add value.
Language and norm provide commensurability and the illusion of greater shared values than exists in demonstrated behavior.
We have learned all to precisely just how fast logic and reason decline with intelligence. Which is a bit more obvious. But we have also learned just how quickly agency decays into impulse. And this is a little bit more complicated.
Reply addressees: @MarkBalzAnthony
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 16:59:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701641574998786048
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701634813416055224
Only ten percent of us think. https://t.co/eiMfV92YMU

Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 06:30:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701483506797363277
RT @whatifalthist: If there is one lesson I want to teach it is that rationality barely exists. 90% of human thought is emotion and 10% is…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 05:40:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701470831547699201