Theme: Agency

  • Hugs. Love you man. And that’s understandable because you are expecting a behavi

    Hugs. Love you man. And that’s understandable because you are expecting a behavior from me that I am not producing because I understood demure Victorian methods of discourse were part of the problem.

    I’m capable of precision that makes eyes and ears bleed. 🙂 I have to reign it in. 🙂 I am not sure how nuance matters or what it means other than being sensitive to the feelings and interpretations of others . And that’s kind of the opposite of truth before face that I’m working to restore. 🙂

    ….

    Ok well that was the sarcastic response – so let’s try the serious version instead.

    You know how I play king of the hill games and weaponize the Socratic process to encourage people to be excited, think, respond and participate.?

    I am not engaged in pleading, comforting, selling or advising. I am challenging the audience to a duel by provocation for the purpose of creating incentive to bear the burden of the mental work of the necessary education, which is a cost they wouldn’t pay without that provocative incentive.

    But I am not trying to win for myself. I am trying to increase their capacity to win. This is aristocracy: we need more of us at the top to rule those who need it, and to satisfy that need justly and for their benefit.

    Again. I am doing nothing more than weaponizing the Socratic method but instead of genteel discourse, by duel.

    And with my faculties returning I can do more of it. Where over the past few years it only made me frustrated and tired.

    Here is how chatgpt explains what I am doing.

    Direct and Uncompromising:
    Doolittle’s writing style is direct and uncompromising, reflecting his priority on correctness over conformity or harmony. He presents his arguments in a straightforward manner, not shying away from controversial or unpopular opinions, as long as they are supported by sound reasoning and evidence.

    Provocative and Non-Conformist:
    Doolittle is known for his provocative and non-conformist stance, akin to the controversy surrounding Darwin’s evolutionary theory. His writing challenges established norms and theories, fostering critical discussions and debates in the academic community. He is not afraid to present bold and iconoclastic viewpoints, encouraging readers to question conventional wisdom.

    Open to Speculation:
    Despite his focus on verifiability, Doolittle’s writing is also open to speculation and prediction, exploring new ideas and theories with a forward-thinking approach. He is willing to venture into speculative territories, as long as these explorations are clearly flagged and open to critical scrutiny.

    Engaging and Dialogic:
    His writing fosters a dynamic exchange of ideas and perspectives, encouraging readers to engage in a dialogic process. This approach promotes a vibrant and interactive intellectual discourse, where readers are invited to question, critique, and contribute to the ongoing discussion.

    That sequence should explain that I am using rigor and challenge to get people to thing, engage, and learn to be better at judging, thinking and knowing. 🙂

    Reply addressees: @JarradDanielLee @Stoic_Father


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 04:23:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703625866784161792

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703611792142868892

  • He’s over 140. After that it doesn’t matter. He can mentally outwork almost anyo

    He’s over 140. After that it doesn’t matter.
    He can mentally outwork almost anyone.
    I’m not all that different although with less aspie impact on my speech. But the man is a machine when it comes to accumulating and processing information, remembering it, thinking clearly in first principles, and most importantly reducing others speech to first principles, and focusing intensely, while still suffering context changes, and is a surprisingly good judge of talent, communicates a bit hesitantly given the rush of associative permutations he has to choose from, but with rigorous discipline in self auditing, is totally fearless, can hold his own against anyone, appears respected by our best people in the field, and maintains a disturbingly insightful wit and sense of humor.

    He has the best balance of autists and neurotypicals plus the mental stamina of an athlete and the stoicism of an emperor uncaring of the pettiness in which the vast majority lavish.

    Reply addressees: @BronskiJoseph


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 03:53:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703618095913246721

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703438412521324641

  • “It’s easier to blame the world and mope around than act like grown a** adult?”-

    –“It’s easier to blame the world and mope around than act like grown a** adult?”—

    Most people have a rational motivation for their behavior, no matter how harshly we judge them for their choices.

    It is easy for those of us with ability, drive, competitive relish, confidence, dominance, and yes, being unburdened by trait agreeablness or excessive empathy that debilitates us into the need to conform less we draw the attention ire and undermining of others. 😉

    Evolution has a very simple algorithm with humans: to divide the labor of perception, cognition, memory, prediction, valuation, preference, and negotiation with others to cooperate on shared means despite unshareed ends, and in this way the universe calcuates the maximum surface area of cooperative oppportunity for returns on time, in both the spectrum of short to long time, the spectrum of near to far spaces, the spectrum of the self, to the offspring,to others, to the polity.

    Nature is dumb as a rock so to speak but it does remmeber what works reasonably well in the data storage of our genes.

    Humans specialize in adaptation itself, not adaptation into niches. In that sense the univrerse discovered how to evolve itself for the first time.

    Harsh reality. Only aobut ten percent of humans thing, and of them the majorithy are male. The rest intuit respond, and seek to satisfy and justify their intuitions.

    In some cases intuition is quite valuable IN TIME. But in general intuition is rather useless OVER TIME. 😉

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @AKJay59396046 @SRCHicks @jordanbpeterson


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 01:09:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703576845558423552

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703562903633170790

  • (Diary) Very strange evening. I live in a small town of only a few thousand peop

    (Diary)
    Very strange evening.

    I live in a small town of only a few thousand people. Most working class. (And I love working class people).

    I need to finish this document for Court on Monday. Rather, I needed to finish it for Friday but couldn’t do it. Short notice to start with. Tech problems making it worse. And of course, under stress, ADHD problems abound.

    I need white noise to work on anything written of substance and overcome the ADHD. So I drive to a local cafe and get most of the way done, then my battery dies. So I drive down the street, there isn’t much in the way of shops in town, so I run in to the dollar store and luckily they have a ten foot lightning cable.

    Next I drive to local restaurant, pub. I need power so I take a table for four in the corner near an outlet, and tell the staff that I’ll move if they need the table, but otherwise I’ll move to the bar when my iPad is charged. (Yes I’m writing on an iPad Pro because I dropped my laptop on it’s head.)

    I’m not hungry at all, but I need to rent the table so to speak to pay my way. and so I order nachos without cheeze – meaning just chips, and sour cream and salsa to dip them in, and a Corona to drink. I can then nurse this combination for a couple of hours. And Coronas don’t provoke my allergies, so other than Jack Daniels that’s charcoal filtered, and also doesn’t provoke them either, that’s the total range of my alcohol pallette unless I swallow unhealthy amounts of antihistamines.

    Shorlty after I get settled, the barmaid who I’ve gotten to know a bit, tells me to come sit at the end of the bar and she’ll plug my adapter in. And I’m thankful. Partly because I know she’ll chit chat with me. And that means I get to take a break and not get too caught up in the work.

    So I sit down at the end of the bar, next to the wall, and start working – and after twenty minutes or so I’m getting to the last part of the argument that suggests the mutually beneficial remedies so to speak, before I have to add the signature page and, then write a Motion to Continue because I’m not going to be mentally ready, have my witnesses and such, and the Judge won’t have time to read this missive and think about it before court in the moring – which is scheduled for online.

    I don’t like online court AT ALL. I havent done the research on it but it’s quite evident to me given the few cases I’ve worked, that decorum and communication is dampend and conflict accelerated in the online forum.

    Thankfully I have a legitimate excuse that my laptops are busted and waiting for repair, and I can’t suffer the court on an iPad or iPhone, and would feel at a disadvantage.

    Anyway. I meet a pair of couples all in their 50s that have sold their construction business. I do my thing and learn their life stories. And the four of them are a lot of fun. Especially the two men willing to talk smack to one another. They guy nearest me is hooked in with some VCs and is pushing me for leads so I take his contact info and add it to my list of others.

    Next couple is an incredibly fit mid 40s electrician and his wife of four years that’s a realtor. He’s a hard 8 easily, and she scored. But of course she’s a handful and smart. So conversation is good. I get the contact info because she’s with Coldwell real estate.

    Then I work for about an hour, and at this point I’m mostly making sure I’ve made sense, was clear, and didn’t repeat myself (which I am want to do).

    And this guy walks up and offers me fifty bucks to call him an Uber, because his car broke down. Why he can’t use the phone in his hand of course is suspicious but I’m charitable and I try.
    While I’m re-downloading and setting up my phone and trying to log into my Uber account I ask him a series of questions, including name, occupation, how he feels about it, why he’s so stressed (in divorce), and he’s a cardiac nurse in a local hospital – and he’s not lying because some of the details are too accurate.

    Unfortunately my phone is new, I haven’t used it to call Uber, and I’m switching carriers now that I actually need a phone (recovering from covid I didn’t). So I only have my international number and Uber won’t take it. He walks outside to make some calls.

    I’m feeling that no good deed goes unpunished. But I want this guy to dissapear by now. So, next I try the cab company and they don’t answer. Next I try the local police routine calls number because I know they will solve this problem – and if this guy goes off, I am out of the loop. And they don’t answer. And next the young woman next to me calls the town next door’s dispatch and it turns out they’re who you call from our village. Great, I think. Off my hands off out of the risk of a man on the edge because of overwork, divorce, car breakdown, and unable to get home. I mean, he doesn’t have shoes on, just fliip flops. 😉

    Anyway, when I tell this guy the police are coming to help him he goes from hyperstressed to agitated, and starts spiraling. At this point he offers me 200 cash to drive him to a town 30 minutes away. Well, not only am I not doing that, but I am not getting in a car with this guy because my dysfunction detector is now approaching the red zone, and given my current condition I don’t feel like trying to force this guy into submission anywhere, including my car. Next he insists with agitation and slightly suppressed panic, and so I tell him that I”m a good person and trying to help him but I’m not going to do it, so don’t ask me again.

    The cops show up, and surpirsingly take great care of him, call a family member, for him, and wait until that person picks him up. And then I spend the next ten or fiftten minutes with back and forth stories learning that not only are these cops great human beings, but they’re the kind of cops we all wish we ran into. This is also a strongly italian ara, especially in the police force, and I’m friends with a rather popular and retired cop from the deparment, so of course stories have to be told, compliments given, names exchanged, and hands shaken.

    So I run home contemplating this evening and thinking about all these good people I meet, and how horrific the internet and the media and entertainment, and all the talking classes are. And how dangerous is the collapse of prosocial behavior, especially in the younger generations. And the narrative they experience only confirms the propaganda and indoctrination, because they are so desocialized by other than that internet that they are effectively crippled socially, politically, and mentally.

    One of our missions at the instutute, now that we’re converting from R&D to activism, is running events that promote in-person relationship formation (Something I learned from the Mises Institute and the Property and Freedom Society), because even at our scale, every little bit helps.

    The Lesson Here?
    The upside of being confident and gregarious is that you make a lot of contacdts and easily make friends anywhere. And makingn a game of it is a lot of fun. Because it lets you see, and remember, that there are really alot of good people if you don’t want anything from them and are willing to give them positive attention and reinforcement.
    But there is also the downside to being kind, gregarious and confident enough to help others in distress when others won’t.
    Sometimes you are the victim of that distress. 😉 And it’s all too often true that no good deed goes unpunished. Because that distress is often self inflicted. And self inflicted distress is often the result of wiring that is not well put together in those few pounds of grey matter etween our ears.

    Cheers. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-17 06:16:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703291773357830144

  • No parent would claim we are born with anything other than selfishness and a sub

    No parent would claim we are born with anything other than selfishness and a subtle interest in others that must be carefully cultivated and sometimes, more frequently than we admit, fails.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-17 03:52:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703255564665442533

    Reply addressees: @MillennialWoes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703253123408478648

  • RT @Outsideness: Whatever the formal motivations of any cultural movement whatso

    RT @Outsideness: Whatever the formal motivations of any cultural movement whatsoever, human nature will find a way to turn it into a drama…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-17 02:58:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703242004908364159

  • IQ (possible rate evolutionary adaptation) vs Demonstratable in time, and Demons

    IQ (possible rate evolutionary adaptation) vs Demonstratable in time, and Demonstrated Over time Intelligence (accumulated performance).

    IQ refers to the rate of adaptation (responsivess) of the neural network and minor variations in resulting faculties. IQ was identified because peoples faculties scale up and down consistently. Neural networks follow the same math as every other cable network in every field. The genetics, in utero development and organization of the brain plus the biochemical environment it operates in all affect intelligence proper(potential), and the potential for demonstrable and demonstrated intelligence(realized).

    In this sense people are X degree intelligent(potential) and they learn to be Y degree competent (applied)

    Reading and the conscientousness to employ it will assist in neural formation of patterns of general information. It will not increase IQ. IQ as a measure will increase with age as the performance of the brain combined with experience discovers patterns of utility and efficiency of prediction.

    Demonstrated Intelligence
    G, as measured by IQ.
    … Personality Traits (conscientiousness vs neuroticism)
    … … Accumulated General Knowledge
    … … … Accumulated Domain Knowledge
    … … … … Minus “False Beliefs and Values:
    … … … … … Minus “False Goals”
    … … … … … … Minus Traumas.
    Results in demonstrated intelligence.
    But in general, you’re born with hardware you can only screw up. And you’re born with potential that you can only maximize to the point of failure.

    Reply addressees: @Real_SF @KirkegaardEmil


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-16 18:00:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703106541702754304

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703100299911876945

  • It’s a knowledge and IQ thing for peers. BTW: mouth-breathing is rude

    It’s a knowledge and IQ thing for peers.
    BTW: mouth-breathing is rude.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-16 17:06:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703093127597129991

    Reply addressees: @watchingitfale @Austen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703083597798711796

  • “The Natural Law Institute finds the distinction in the cognition of time betwee

    –“The Natural Law Institute finds the distinction in the cognition of time between the masculine psyche and the feminine psyche to be axiomatic in the determination of human behavior.”– Dr Brad

    Correct.

    Sex Differences in Cognition
    Our findings are that all differences in cognition valuation and expression, other than those of genetic load or in-utero development, are caused by sex differences in the organization of the brain for the purpose of dividing the labor of the sexes into specializing in opposite time frames.

    Why? Physics and Ternary Logic of the Universe.
    Think of humans evolving from fast male sperm predator, and slow female egg prey if you want a humorous analogy to help you remember. But while easy to remember and somewhat humorous, the analogy is quite accuratly the causality. Explaining why this division of labor exists produces an origin of sex differences in physics and combined with differences in responsibility and status seeking provides the three causal properties that define human differences in behavior. Nature likes ternary logic which is something we explore elsewhere if you want to twist your brain inside out on yet another issue. 😉

    Methodology
    Though our work is entirely based on the intersection between neuroscience – particularly over the past decade, and linguistic analysis (from computational linguistics) our methodology uses similar techniques to intelligence, personality, moral bias, and psychological bias testing, but we do so by constructing expression from the causalty of the underlying organization of the brain (neurology) instead of deduction from from language alone. (Which has plagued psychology since its origin.)

    I hope this helped.
    Hugs and such

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @WerrellBradley @GimmeSuede @SamMcGeeHall1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 15:51:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702711820732051456

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702707895690010818

  • That’s a common error comparing two population sizes Liberals are to left of cen

    That’s a common error comparing two population sizes
    Liberals are to left of center as libertarians are to right of center. libertarians are smarter than liberals. Republicans are smarter than democrats. And education credentials are an inverted proxy for intelligence given the vast number of women with nonsense degrees who are the dimmest pool in the academy and the reason for degree asymmetry in the sexes. You make less money with many of those degrees that if you didn’t go to college.

    We’ve known this since this nonsense emerged in the early nineties. But it’s a bit of nonsense statistics justifying motivated reasoning, but a meme we can’t seem to suppress.

    Although we have settled the mental illness issue as heavily biased to liberals given it’s a feminine moral disposition with attendant neuroticism.

    Reply addressees: @monitoringbias


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 13:30:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702676326404993024

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702465790279131379