Smart kids lie 100% of the time? Q: More intelligent children tend to be more deceptive—can you explain this?A: The experiment was simplicity itself. A child is asked to sit facing away from a box. The experimenter puts something in the box and says “Do not peek, do not peek” and then leaves the room. Most children peek. The experimenter returns and asks, “Did you peek?” Most children lie—but they do so the more frequently the brighter they are, as judged by a simple cognitive test. If your child is especially bright, he or she lies 100 percent of the time, slow 65 percent of the time. The same thing is true for health at birth. The healthier you are the more apt you are to lie 4 years later. —I wonder if fear of reprisal factors into that experiment?— Curt Doolittle I actually think it’s **awareness of harm**. The child does not obey rules so much as the single rule of doing no harm. The dumber the child the less certain he is that he does no harm. The smarter the more certain he is that he does no harm. This matches the 5 or 6 personality type measures that most of the field relies upon: what we call many things but what I learned as ‘blame avoidance’ or ‘fear of harm’ or ‘fear of retaliation’. I have been criticized my entire life, from childhood to the present for having no respect for rules. I’ve said, I think since I was 13? that “rules are for people who need them”. we only need one rule: do no harm. Or more correctly: impose no cost upon property en toto of others. Or epistemologically stated: impose no cost except upon that proerty-en-toto which you know to be yours.
Theme: Agency
-
Intelligence and Rule-Breaking Deception
Smart kids lie 100% of the time? Q: More intelligent children tend to be more deceptive—can you explain this?A: The experiment was simplicity itself. A child is asked to sit facing away from a box. The experimenter puts something in the box and says “Do not peek, do not peek” and then leaves the room. Most children peek. The experimenter returns and asks, “Did you peek?” Most children lie—but they do so the more frequently the brighter they are, as judged by a simple cognitive test. If your child is especially bright, he or she lies 100 percent of the time, slow 65 percent of the time. The same thing is true for health at birth. The healthier you are the more apt you are to lie 4 years later. —I wonder if fear of reprisal factors into that experiment?— Curt Doolittle I actually think it’s **awareness of harm**. The child does not obey rules so much as the single rule of doing no harm. The dumber the child the less certain he is that he does no harm. The smarter the more certain he is that he does no harm. This matches the 5 or 6 personality type measures that most of the field relies upon: what we call many things but what I learned as ‘blame avoidance’ or ‘fear of harm’ or ‘fear of retaliation’. I have been criticized my entire life, from childhood to the present for having no respect for rules. I’ve said, I think since I was 13? that “rules are for people who need them”. we only need one rule: do no harm. Or more correctly: impose no cost upon property en toto of others. Or epistemologically stated: impose no cost except upon that proerty-en-toto which you know to be yours.
-
Curiously, we might want to look at the data carefully. Because men will vote fo
Curiously, we might want to look at the data carefully. Because men will vote for someone they don’t like, even if women won’t.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 12:51:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674934374270373889
Reply addressees: @GallupNews
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674933546314764288
IN REPLY TO:
@Gallup
Donald Trump Well-Known, but Not Well-Liked… https://t.co/keA62oPBM2 https://t.co/H39svMVgfh
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674933546314764288
-
MY VIEW OF MAN? My view of mankind? Mostly? Excited children running with scisso
MY VIEW OF MAN?
My view of mankind? Mostly? Excited children running with scissors – with a precious few elder historians trying their best to prevent the worst of the injuries.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 10:06:00 UTC
-
INTELLIGENCE AND DECEPTION Q: More intelligent children tend to be more deceptiv
INTELLIGENCE AND DECEPTION
Q: More intelligent children tend to be more deceptive—can you explain this?
A: The experiment was simplicity itself. A child is asked to sit facing away from a box. The experimenter puts something in the box and says “Do not peek, do not peek” and then leaves the room. Most children peek. The experimenter returns and asks, “Did you peek?” Most children lie—but they do so the more frequently the brighter they are, as judged by a simple cognitive test. If your child is especially bright, he or she lies 100 percent of the time, slow 65 percent of the time. The same thing is true for health at birth. The healthier you are the more apt you are to lie 4 years later.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-08 06:38:00 UTC
-
(diary) did good work today. took kirill’s advice and worked at sleeping. plus t
(diary)
did good work today. took kirill’s advice and worked at sleeping. plus the vitamin d clearly works. still having problems because of the darkness but it’s a thousand times better than last year.
today is one of those days where everything went well, but I really appreciate all my friends. thank god for all of them.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 14:46:00 UTC
-
MORAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE’S EFFECT ON MAN I am pretty sure it’s possible. It
MORAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE’S EFFECT ON MAN
I am pretty sure it’s possible. It’s not even that difficult. It’s just expensive. But rather than being the moral police of machines, what if machines can be the moral teachers and police of us?
Interesting thought.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 07:09:00 UTC
-
Motherhood teaches wisdom by trial and error rather than wishful thinking and pr
Motherhood teaches wisdom by trial and error rather than wishful thinking and pretense – assuming the mother wishes to learn.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 05:47:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673740512386523136
Reply addressees: @AliceTeller
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673663837028028416
IN REPLY TO:
@AliceTeller
Just when you thought we had all died off or were reduced to mind numbing dreariness, here we are! https://t.co/hgv84qpUsw
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673663837028028416
-
( aspieness ) ( diary ) When I was in seventh grade I remember the school wantin
( aspieness ) ( diary )
When I was in seventh grade I remember the school wanting me to take another reading course because my tests came back with lower comprehension scores. Which I thought strange given my rather absurd volume of reading and the level of books that I was reading. My mother was convinced something was wrong and went to talk to the principle.
But I never connected my stunted ability to empathize with and therefore agree with the questions asked as an impediment to reading comprehension. And I am pretty sure I just saw most writing reliant I empathy as irrelevant or an attempt to cloud the issue.
Once I began to understand the influence of autism in delaying development it became obvious.
Now I find it humorous. Although I still have a problem with dramatic fiction unless it is loaded with ideas rather than experiences.
I suppose it’s why encyclopedias were so enjoyable to read so young. Lots of information but no incomprehensible experiences to create confusion.
To some degree the world is so much easier once you realize that you’re different. And just fine when you realize our brains develop at different rates in order to create an inter temporal division of perception.
Equality has been a catastrophe. The classroom has been a catastrophe. These are industrial concepts not human.
Unlike ants, our specialization does not produce easily visible physical differences.
Most of our differences are the result of minor variations in hormones which produce a symphony of specializations largely by accelerating or limiting some region of growth.
We specialize in conceptual biases.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 08:49:00 UTC
-
Ceremony is a deceitful substitute for meaningful action that changes the course
Ceremony is a deceitful substitute for meaningful action that changes the course of events.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-04 19:37:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/672862352262504449
Reply addressees: @SpeakerRyan @uscapitol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/672860628973977600
IN REPLY TO:
@SpeakerRyan
The @uscapitol flags are flying at half-staff in remembrance of the innocent lives lost in #SanBernardino. https://t.co/pIjDmiP7bW
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/672860628973977600