@RedPilledWorld @voxday Oh. I know Vox’s “Math” and as an explanation: non corre

@RedPilledWorld@voxday

Oh. I know Vox’s “Math” and as an explanation: non correlation without explaining causation. Now, the means of falsifying this particular argument is relatively simple and someone has already done so in this thread.

For example, there are about 100M neural columns in your head. They manage to predict and iteratively test and re-predict a model of the world within a few milliseconds. This EVOLUTION of disorder into order you call perception is possible because those 100M neural colums work in PARALLEL. And they do so by adversarial competition for prediction over time. And those columns that correctly predict contain neurons that get fed for that correct prediction. Now, evolution works the same way. In massive parallel and variation and hybridization and variation and speciation and so on. So the (moronic) oversight of such calculations as vox has stated is presuming that taking an average rate of mutation in a stable life form that by its stability limits mutations is sufficient to statistically represent the wide variety of rates of mutation, the wide variety of selection criteria, and the massive parallelism that occurs as this wide range of potentials compete. Now, of course, the correct answer is that because evolution (evolutionary computation) is the function (first principle) of the universe, and because of the absolutely stupid-simple method of computation by which the universe computes increase in the capture of energy as existence – a stable relation, that anything that can be computed will be computed.

And the rate of computation is simply the set of methods of evolutionary computation, the rate of trial and error, the rate and number of regulatory processes, the complexity of the exchange between the cellular biochemistry and the production of molecules, the rate of reproduction, the degree of parallelization, the number and frequency of speciation and recombination, the division of responsibility between cells, organisms, and complex organisms, and the chaos of the selection criteria produced by the environment, resources and competitors. Not how few of those factors are present in the ‘moron math’ of vox day. And how easily you morons are fooled by a basic incomprehension of basic statistics.

The big ‘oops’ for example is the capture of mitochondria by one cell that tried to eat another cell. This allowed cells to divide by providing external resources of energy production, and the nucleus to divide the genetic material without increasing genetic mass, and without accounting for energy production. This ‘oops’ is not the only ‘oops’ that appears to have happened.

SIMPLE MATH VERSION
Any math that ends in infinities is false.
Any math that is non-correspondent is false.
Any math that cannot provide an operational construction is false.
Because all of these failures are evidence of a failure to account for variables – what we call ‘hidden variables’.

Vox’s math (which isn’t his by the way), is false.