—“Show up or shut up.”—James Knowles
(That’s the net of it.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:33:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140054690832572420
Source: Twitter X
-
“Show up or shut up.”—James Knowles (That’s the net of it.)
-
You haven’t spent much time in russia then or now. They would produce one plant
You haven’t spent much time in russia then or now. They would produce one plant that theoretically could run carbon free, fake the results, make a plan for producing many more, promote it, fail to maintain it, and move on to the next anti western propaganda initiative. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:19:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140051247698984960
Reply addressees: @karlbykarlsmith
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140038477507158016
IN REPLY TO:
@thesubtledoctor
If the USSR was still around I am fairly confident they would be nearly carbon free. In power for sure and probably in transport.
There is little the regime cared about more than geopolitical wins over the West. If people had to freeze to do it they would do it. No question. https://t.co/gbhTjVXN9bOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140038477507158016
-
Silly people practice socio political Luddism. Some of us adapt legal technology
Silly people practice socio political Luddism. Some of us adapt legal technology to suit incentives.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:14:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140050028184121349
Reply addressees: @BagleyDevon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140049698105036800
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BagleyDevon Serial monogamy is our evolutionary state. Farming and animal husbandry gradually replaced it under multigenerational families. Absolute nuclear families the result of capital accumulation. We no longer have incentives: the pill, redistribution, heavy taxes, no fault divorce.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140049698105036800
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@BagleyDevon Serial monogamy is our evolutionary state. Farming and animal husbandry gradually replaced it under multigenerational families. Absolute nuclear families the result of capital accumulation. We no longer have incentives: the pill, redistribution, heavy taxes, no fault divorce.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140049698105036800
-
Serial monogamy is our evolutionary state. Farming and animal husbandry graduall
Serial monogamy is our evolutionary state. Farming and animal husbandry gradually replaced it under multigenerational families. Absolute nuclear families the result of capital accumulation. We no longer have incentives: the pill, redistribution, heavy taxes, no fault divorce.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:13:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140049698105036800
Reply addressees: @BagleyDevon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140048780441600001
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BagleyDevon Rationality (reasoning) and rational actor (following incentives) are two different things. People are rational actors. They follow incentives. We cannot force people to stay married, only assist one another in re-sorting into new families.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140048780441600001
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@BagleyDevon Rationality (reasoning) and rational actor (following incentives) are two different things. People are rational actors. They follow incentives. We cannot force people to stay married, only assist one another in re-sorting into new families.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140048780441600001
-
Rationality (reasoning) and rational actor (following incentives) are two differ
Rationality (reasoning) and rational actor (following incentives) are two different things. People are rational actors. They follow incentives. We cannot force people to stay married, only assist one another in re-sorting into new families.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:09:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140048780441600001
Reply addressees: @BagleyDevon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140048485598793733
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BagleyDevon Women leave because they want more out of a relationship than is possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140048485598793733
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@BagleyDevon Women leave because they want more out of a relationship than is possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140048485598793733
-
Women leave because they want more out of a relationship than is possible
Women leave because they want more out of a relationship than is possible.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:08:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140048485598793733
Reply addressees: @BagleyDevon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140048235609886720
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BagleyDevon Men leave because they are treated below her children, friends, pets, and just an ATM.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140048235609886720
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@BagleyDevon Men leave because they are treated below her children, friends, pets, and just an ATM.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140048235609886720
-
Men leave because they are treated below her children, friends, pets, and just a
Men leave because they are treated below her children, friends, pets, and just an ATM.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:07:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140048235609886720
Reply addressees: @BagleyDevon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140047936220532739
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BagleyDevon Women cheat for hypergamy, men for respect, affection and sex. Women destroy relationships thru sh-t testing, nagging, demand for independence but psychological demand for dependence producing cumulative resentment. Men by detachment, antisocial behavior, demand for attention.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140047936220532739
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@BagleyDevon Women cheat for hypergamy, men for respect, affection and sex. Women destroy relationships thru sh-t testing, nagging, demand for independence but psychological demand for dependence producing cumulative resentment. Men by detachment, antisocial behavior, demand for attention.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140047936220532739
-
Women cheat for hypergamy, men for respect, affection and sex. Women destroy rel
Women cheat for hypergamy, men for respect, affection and sex. Women destroy relationships thru sh-t testing, nagging, demand for independence but psychological demand for dependence producing cumulative resentment. Men by detachment, antisocial behavior, demand for attention.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:06:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140047936220532739
Reply addressees: @BagleyDevon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140045367259664385
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BagleyDevon Women initiate more than 2/3 of divorces. College educated women 90%. Current legislation prevents rotation of men into healthy families. Favors women overwhelmingly, and destroys men’s familial, social, economic, retirement security. Men with the children remarry. Women not.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140045367259664385
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@BagleyDevon Women initiate more than 2/3 of divorces. College educated women 90%. Current legislation prevents rotation of men into healthy families. Favors women overwhelmingly, and destroys men’s familial, social, economic, retirement security. Men with the children remarry. Women not.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1140045367259664385
-
Women initiate more than 2/3 of divorces. College educated women 90%. Current le
Women initiate more than 2/3 of divorces. College educated women 90%. Current legislation prevents rotation of men into healthy families. Favors women overwhelmingly, and destroys men’s familial, social, economic, retirement security. Men with the children remarry. Women not.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-15 23:56:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140045367259664385
Reply addressees: @BagleyDevon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140016371503255552
IN REPLY TO:
@BagleyDevon
@curtdoolittle 1) Rationality is not exactly some peoples strength. This creates incentive for men to divorce women. 2) Men do this already regardless of obligations to children. 3) Current legislation favors fathers bearing half of child rearing responsibility. Punishes uninvolved fathers.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140016371503255552
-
Why would a quantum(particle) or wave function(wave) equation ‘create the earth’
Why would a quantum(particle) or wave function(wave) equation ‘create the earth’? Instead you might ask, how a big bang that creates a universe, galaxies, solar systems, and planets, can emerge from an instance of a dead (cool) universe.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-15 20:28:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139993027555069952
Reply addressees: @HaraldMagnusson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139988853077528577
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139988853077528577