BEST SO FAR, MERGED INTO ONE….
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-24 00:07:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142947386052042754
Source: Twitter X
-
Southwestern ct and most of jersey are suburbs of ny. most of the rest of CT and
Southwestern ct and most of jersey are suburbs of ny. most of the rest of CT and all of RI are a suburbs of boston…. CT lost out. Boston got MIT, and Hartford put the university in Storrs instead of bulldozing the north end.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-23 22:30:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142922805807390720
Reply addressees: @mattsko @simongerman600
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142922400566300672
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@mattsko @simongerman600 This map shows that: sw CT is in dark blue with NYC. And sitting here in CT at the moment it’s rather obvious. Worse, the 91-95 corridor is largely post-soviety-style slums and the rural areas are closer in character to western mass, nh, me.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142922400566300672
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@mattsko @simongerman600 This map shows that: sw CT is in dark blue with NYC. And sitting here in CT at the moment it’s rather obvious. Worse, the 91-95 corridor is largely post-soviety-style slums and the rural areas are closer in character to western mass, nh, me.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142922400566300672
-
This map shows that: sw CT is in dark blue with NYC. And sitting here in CT at t
This map shows that: sw CT is in dark blue with NYC. And sitting here in CT at the moment it’s rather obvious. Worse, the 91-95 corridor is largely post-soviety-style slums and the rural areas are closer in character to western mass, nh, me.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-23 22:28:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142922400566300672
Reply addressees: @mattsko @simongerman600
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142906772589555712
IN REPLY TO:
@mattsko
@simongerman600 A lot of New Englanders think that most of Connecticut is really in the NYC region.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142906772589555712
-
CIVIC HONESTY AROUND THE GLOBE — WORSE THAN YOU’D THINK
CIVIC HONESTY AROUND THE GLOBE — WORSE THAN YOU’D THINK
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2019/06/19/science.aau8712.full
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-23 21:56:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142914445515137024
-
(I make mistakes like anyone, but I don’t make errors, particularly of this magn
(I make mistakes like anyone, but I don’t make errors, particularly of this magnitude. it’s my job. I have all of you to compensate for. 😉 And if you learned Propertarianism you wouldn’t make them any longer either – if you could tolerate that much truth. Some people can’t.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-23 17:39:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142849669833379840
Reply addressees: @Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142849218559860736
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux It is more correct to say that we need mindfulness at personal, interpersonal, social, and political scales. There are many ways of producing mindfulness. Abrahamic deceit just happens to be the very worst of them.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142849218559860736
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux It is more correct to say that we need mindfulness at personal, interpersonal, social, and political scales. There are many ways of producing mindfulness. Abrahamic deceit just happens to be the very worst of them.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142849218559860736
-
It is more correct to say that we need mindfulness at personal, interpersonal, s
It is more correct to say that we need mindfulness at personal, interpersonal, social, and political scales. There are many ways of producing mindfulness. Abrahamic deceit just happens to be the very worst of them.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-23 17:37:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142849218559860736
Reply addressees: @Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142848986245718017
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux … I spent more than four years working on religion and it is THE hard problem of social science precisely for the reasons that I’m counter-signaling your attempts at conflationary justification -even though you don’t understand what you’re doing (a side effect of abrahamism).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142848986245718017
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux … I spent more than four years working on religion and it is THE hard problem of social science precisely for the reasons that I’m counter-signaling your attempts at conflationary justification -even though you don’t understand what you’re doing (a side effect of abrahamism).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142848986245718017
-
I spent more than four years working on religion and it is THE hard problem of s
… I spent more than four years working on religion and it is THE hard problem of social science precisely for the reasons that I’m counter-signaling your attempts at conflationary justification -even though you don’t understand what you’re doing (a side effect of abrahamism).
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-23 17:36:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142848986245718017
Reply addressees: @Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142848788408803328
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux So, when Stefan says we need ‘religions’ that is true, but without enumerating what is necessary and good from what is unnecessary and bad, we do not know what constitutes a religion that is good and one that is bad. …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142848788408803328
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux So, when Stefan says we need ‘religions’ that is true, but without enumerating what is necessary and good from what is unnecessary and bad, we do not know what constitutes a religion that is good and one that is bad. …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142848788408803328
-
So, when Stefan says we need ‘religions’ that is true, but without enumerating w
So, when Stefan says we need ‘religions’ that is true, but without enumerating what is necessary and good from what is unnecessary and bad, we do not know what constitutes a religion that is good and one that is bad. …
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-23 17:35:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142848788408803328
Reply addressees: @Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142848453023862787
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux I don’t waffle. I force you do disambiguate so that you can’t make false equivalencies. The chinese think we are ‘ridiculous’ (stupid) in our religions. It is hard to question whether shito is a religion in the same context as abrahamic religions. ….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142848453023862787
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux I don’t waffle. I force you do disambiguate so that you can’t make false equivalencies. The chinese think we are ‘ridiculous’ (stupid) in our religions. It is hard to question whether shito is a religion in the same context as abrahamic religions. ….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142848453023862787
-
I don’t waffle. I force you do disambiguate so that you can’t make false equival
I don’t waffle. I force you do disambiguate so that you can’t make false equivalencies. The chinese think we are ‘ridiculous’ (stupid) in our religions. It is hard to question whether shito is a religion in the same context as abrahamic religions. ….
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-23 17:34:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142848453023862787
Reply addressees: @Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142843533210116096
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142843533210116096
-
The reason is the west and far east were homogenous polities, and the middle eas
The reason is the west and far east were homogenous polities, and the middle east wasn’t. The west was good farmland but distributed. The center and far east were river civs that were easily controlled, and therefore taxes, and could support standing armies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-23 17:20:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142844854273290240
Reply addressees: @Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142844543026548738
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux It’s not like this hasn’t been discussed for the past three centuries. It is very hard to study history and not see the post-ice-age pattern. the west ran with truth and tech, the middle east with supernaturalism and sophism, and the far east with ‘reasonableness’ and harmony.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142844543026548738
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Catholic76 @StefanMolyneux It’s not like this hasn’t been discussed for the past three centuries. It is very hard to study history and not see the post-ice-age pattern. the west ran with truth and tech, the middle east with supernaturalism and sophism, and the far east with ‘reasonableness’ and harmony.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142844543026548738