@Alba_Returns (Welcome back. Missed ya.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 13:36:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177940203320811521
Source: Twitter X
-
ORRGSM IS A RESOURCE, JUST LIKE VIOLENCE GSRRM like Violence for which it is a s
ORRGSM IS A RESOURCE, JUST LIKE VIOLENCE
GSRRM like Violence for which it is a substitute, is simply a resource. The question is what you are using the resource for … punishing the… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=474267846503444&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 13:33:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177939428322545664
-
A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cer
A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX
—“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cerebral cortex require fractal geometry, like a coastline? Does it have self similarity?”—The Nationalist… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=474259816504247&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 13:18:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177935644770877440
-
reciprocity, completeness (limits, full accounting, parsimony), and coherence (a
… reciprocity, completeness (limits, full accounting, parsimony), and coherence (across all those dimensions), with warranty of due diligence sufficient to satisfy demand for decidability, and resources sufficient to perform restitution. In other words it’s testimonial.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 13:12:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177934106916769799
Reply addressees: @LLaddon @TheRajput8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177933698144047106
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 P uses testimony, not just internal consistency, or external correspondence (empiricism). All 8 dimensions of possible human sense perception. P is ‘complete’ where logic and empiricism are not: Tests: identity, logic, correspondence, operational possibility, rational choice …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177933698144047106
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 P uses testimony, not just internal consistency, or external correspondence (empiricism). All 8 dimensions of possible human sense perception. P is ‘complete’ where logic and empiricism are not: Tests: identity, logic, correspondence, operational possibility, rational choice …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177933698144047106
-
P uses testimony, not just internal consistency, or external correspondence (emp
P uses testimony, not just internal consistency, or external correspondence (empiricism). All 8 dimensions of possible human sense perception. P is ‘complete’ where logic and empiricism are not: Tests: identity, logic, correspondence, operational possibility, rational choice …
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 13:10:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177933698144047106
Reply addressees: @LLaddon @TheRajput8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177932963876614144
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 It’s science (operational logic) not set logic, and so yes, I can’t falsify it -nor can anyone else. Also, I don’t think a proof means what you think it does. It’s a test of internal consistency (of words). So axioms (arbitrary verbal rules) vs Laws (necessary actions). …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177932963876614144
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 It’s science (operational logic) not set logic, and so yes, I can’t falsify it -nor can anyone else. Also, I don’t think a proof means what you think it does. It’s a test of internal consistency (of words). So axioms (arbitrary verbal rules) vs Laws (necessary actions). …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177932963876614144
-
It’s science (operational logic) not set logic, and so yes, I can’t falsify it –
It’s science (operational logic) not set logic, and so yes, I can’t falsify it -nor can anyone else. Also, I don’t think a proof means what you think it does. It’s a test of internal consistency (of words). So axioms (arbitrary verbal rules) vs Laws (necessary actions). …
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 13:07:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177932963876614144
Reply addressees: @LLaddon @TheRajput8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177923129022304257
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177923129022304257
-
P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence) —-“You
P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence)
—-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=474234919840070&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 12:31:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177923887960592384
-
The question is only the precision of the measures. P is the most precise n-dime
The question is only the precision of the measures.
P is the most precise n-dimensional language we have.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 12:26:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177922564758343680
Reply addressees: @LLaddon @TheRajput8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177922424291115008
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177922424291115008
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177922424291115008
-
Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambigu
Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 12:26:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177922424291115008
Reply addressees: @LLaddon @TheRajput8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177921985508249600
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 But that’s a great question because very few people have the insight to ask it. So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177921985508249600
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 But that’s a great question because very few people have the insight to ask it. So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177921985508249600
-
But that’s a great question because very few people have the insight to ask it.
But that’s a great question because very few people have the insight to ask it. So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 12:24:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177921985508249600
Reply addressees: @LLaddon @TheRajput8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177921627633471488
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 Process:Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization. Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177921627633471488
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 Process:Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization. Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177921627633471488