Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 12:26:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177922424291115008
Reply addressees: @LLaddon @TheRajput8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177921985508249600
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 But that’s a great question because very few people have the insight to ask it. So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177921985508249600
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LLaddon @TheRajput8 But that’s a great question because very few people have the insight to ask it. So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177921985508249600
Leave a Reply