Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 19:08:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199042204628590592
Source: Twitter X
-
HOW MANY OF THESE ARE OBTAINED BY BAITING INTO HAZARD? MERIT 123 Mitchell Rales
HOW MANY OF THESE ARE OBTAINED BY BAITING INTO HAZARD?
MERIT
123 Mitchell Rales 2,500 53 Washington Danaher Corp **
123 Steven Rales 2,500 58 Washington Danaher Corp **
296 Jeremy Jacobs Sr…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=515023119094583&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 18:56:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199039104341684224
-
In other words. With a different legal structure with greater liability, this wo
In other words. With a different legal structure with greater liability, this would rapidly disappear.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 18:43:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199035886270320641
Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199035217337413640
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Steve_Sailer Steve: Any data by occupation? Because it certainly appears that they favor occupations that “Bait into Hazard, with Unwarrantable Services”. IOW: White Civ is wealthy partly because of what we DON’T do. But we are vulnerable to those that exploit what we don’t do. (True in USA)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1199035217337413640
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Steve_Sailer Steve: Any data by occupation? Because it certainly appears that they favor occupations that “Bait into Hazard, with Unwarrantable Services”. IOW: White Civ is wealthy partly because of what we DON’T do. But we are vulnerable to those that exploit what we don’t do. (True in USA)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1199035217337413640
-
Steve: Any data by occupation? Because it certainly appears that they favor occu
Steve: Any data by occupation? Because it certainly appears that they favor occupations that “Bait into Hazard, with Unwarrantable Services”. IOW: White Civ is wealthy partly because of what we DON’T do. But we are vulnerable to those that exploit what we don’t do. (True in USA)
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 18:40:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199035217337413640
Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198810300406874112
IN REPLY TO:
@Steve_Sailer
https://t.co/nOtx9Gu6ez
Jewish people make up about 0.2% of the world’s population, so “Jewish Business News’” 2018 estimate that 19% of Forbes’ top 200 richest people on earth are Jewish suggests that the disproportion is approaching two orders of magnitude above random chance. https://t.co/HEjMBLbSusOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198810300406874112
-
I don’t put much stock in it. But it sure is an interesting idea. See “White Pla
I don’t put much stock in it. But it sure is an interesting idea. See “White Plague” by Frank Herbert, author of Dune. https://twitter.com/kofinas/status/1196491401321746433
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 15:54:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198993251262517251
-
Great example. (afaik, transgender: a mental illness like all the rest of the bo
Great example. (afaik, transgender: a mental illness like all the rest of the body image mental illnesses.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 14:36:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198973722398511105
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198960773948755969
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
Catering to the transgendered to the extent that they demand (like in sports) is little different than this Dutch nursing home/village which styled as a fake town for people with dementia – it’s playing along with their madness https://t.co/isM8BuFunD
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198960773948755969
-
Jayman: That’s the most recent theory, but why is that a better candidate rather
Jayman: That’s the most recent theory, but why is that a better candidate rather than just another birth defect and failure to miscarry? Sure, cause might be viral; like cervical infections, carried in families. But it might also be immunological. What’s tipped your confidence?
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 14:34:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198973320798130176
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198961716199071744
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
And yet another unPC statement: the most likely cause of male homosexuality is a pathogen, likely a virus acquired in early childhood. Homosexuality isn’t a choice (a silly idea anyway), but it’s not inborn either.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198961716199071744
-
TO THE IDIOTS WHO DISAGREED: “TAKE THE COUNTRYSIDE AND THE CITIES WILL FALL.” Ma
TO THE IDIOTS WHO DISAGREED: “TAKE THE COUNTRYSIDE AND THE CITIES WILL FALL.”
Martin van Creveld is one of the top two military historians living today and was responsible for correctly… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=514771792453049&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 12:26:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198940949432406017
-
“One of the surest paths to success is to tell people good things about their ba
—“One of the surest paths to success is to tell people good things about their bad habits/vices/economic shortcomings/etc…especially when dealing with fast lifestyle/r reproductive… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=514485829148312&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 02:35:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198792200655687680
-
1: paradoxes (sets) vs only bad grammar (operations) 2: all = inclusive (sets) v
1: paradoxes (sets) vs only bad grammar (operations)
2: all = inclusive (sets) vs all = dependent (operations)
3: sets (ideals) vs operations (reals)
Your quip was version of #2.
Almost all philosophy is nonsense.
Just bad grammar.
Numerology with vocabulary.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 01:56:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198782360856223744
Reply addressees: @Joseph_EHerrera
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198777986083889152
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198777986083889152