An Awkward Relationship with Xianty. https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/05/an-awkward-relationship-with-xianty/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:51:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225084604836655106
Source: Twitter X
-
An lot of people don’t have positive association for ignorant superstitious post
An lot of people don’t have positive association for ignorant superstitious posturing fundamentalists who use The Great Lie to explain why they don’t integrate and cooperate with others on truthful and reciprocal terms – pretending have something to trade other than undermining.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:48:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225083895504429057
Reply addressees: @AutisticArchiv1 @drmiller1960 @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224901171820879874
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224901171820879874
-
Why do we need to win over hand writing effeminate pacifists? Why does your opin
Why do we need to win over hand writing effeminate pacifists? Why does your opinion matter? Anyone who will fight for our cause, will care more about achieving liberty to determine our future regardless of the reason we practice christian ethics than making excuses for why.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:44:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225082833674391554
Reply addressees: @AutisticArchiv1 @WolfishHead
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225075141199237120
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225075141199237120
-
TEARING UP THE SPEECH: VIOLATING WESTERN CUSTOMARY LAW (And why women are incapa
TEARING UP THE SPEECH: VIOLATING WESTERN CUSTOMARY LAW (And why women are incapable of political participation)
#PettyPelosi https://t.co/qfrLhWiaRC
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:40:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225081691930341376
-
TEARING UP THE SPEECH #Trump @realDonaldTrump #Conservatives #NewRight
TEARING UP THE SPEECH
#Trump @realDonaldTrump #Conservatives #NewRight https://t.co/WBBHeFWuOq
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:37:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225081137233584128
-
Tearing Up The Speech – vs The Western Tradition
Tearing Up The Speech – vs The Western Tradition https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/05/tearing-up-the-speech-vs-the-western-tradition/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:34:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225080253816635392
-
P-Law explains the West, and lets us defend it from competing traditions that do
P-Law explains the West, and lets us defend it from competing traditions that don’t practice truth telling, and some of which (Semitic) consist entirely of lying. It may take a few decades for P-Law to take root as the logic of social science, but it will, b/c: Explanatory Power.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:15:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225075363535097856
Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225074697370505216
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ScottAdamsSays Westerners intuit these customary laws, but because they are customs are thousands of years old, and we lacked (until now) an operational(scientific) explanation of the western tradition and its reason for our disproportionate success: P(Natural)-law articulates these intuitions.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225074697370505216
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ScottAdamsSays Westerners intuit these customary laws, but because they are customs are thousands of years old, and we lacked (until now) an operational(scientific) explanation of the western tradition and its reason for our disproportionate success: P(Natural)-law articulates these intuitions.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225074697370505216
-
Westerners intuit these customary laws, but because they are customs are thousan
Westerners intuit these customary laws, but because they are customs are thousands of years old, and we lacked (until now) an operational(scientific) explanation of the western tradition and its reason for our disproportionate success: P(Natural)-law articulates these intuitions.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:12:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225074697370505216
Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225073865937838082
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ScottAdamsSays Truth is a Commons in the West. Limiting public speech to the Testimonial and Reciprocal licenses VOLUNTARY TRADE (argument) but prohibits INVOLUNTARY HARMS. The duel between sovereign men b/c insult prohibited untruths. We failed to clarify that free speech meant Free Testimony.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225073865937838082
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ScottAdamsSays Truth is a Commons in the West. Limiting public speech to the Testimonial and Reciprocal licenses VOLUNTARY TRADE (argument) but prohibits INVOLUNTARY HARMS. The duel between sovereign men b/c insult prohibited untruths. We failed to clarify that free speech meant Free Testimony.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225073865937838082
-
Truth is a Commons in the West. Limiting public speech to the Testimonial and Re
Truth is a Commons in the West. Limiting public speech to the Testimonial and Reciprocal licenses VOLUNTARY TRADE (argument) but prohibits INVOLUNTARY HARMS. The duel between sovereign men b/c insult prohibited untruths. We failed to clarify that free speech meant Free Testimony.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:09:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225073865937838082
Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225072500037636100
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ScottAdamsSays WESTERN CIV’S EXPLANATION: Testimony: Jury > Thang > Senate > Multiple Houses > Public Speech. In the Western Tradition of Sovereignty the only reason to tolerate free speech is if it is Testimony (Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Reciprocity) – else violence licensed.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225072500037636100
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ScottAdamsSays WESTERN CIV’S EXPLANATION: Testimony: Jury > Thang > Senate > Multiple Houses > Public Speech. In the Western Tradition of Sovereignty the only reason to tolerate free speech is if it is Testimony (Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Reciprocity) – else violence licensed.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225072500037636100
-
WESTERN CIV’S EXPLANATION: Testimony: Jury > Thang > Senate > Multiple Houses >
WESTERN CIV’S EXPLANATION: Testimony: Jury > Thang > Senate > Multiple Houses > Public Speech. In the Western Tradition of Sovereignty the only reason to tolerate free speech is if it is Testimony (Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Reciprocity) – else violence licensed.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:03:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225072500037636100
Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225052207868858369
IN REPLY TO:
@ScottAdamsSays
I can’t generate any fake outrage about Pelosi dramatically ripping up some paper. And if what we remember of the speech is Pelosi’s disgusted reaction to it, she wins. #SOTU
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225052207868858369