https://twitter.com/KurtKurtking/status/1225764811730018307 https://t.co/iJWkqrZF9x

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 13:00:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225766259804995584
https://twitter.com/KurtKurtking/status/1225764811730018307 https://t.co/iJWkqrZF9x

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 13:00:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225766259804995584
Well, there can be no global commons, because there are no unowned (non-state) commons – that would be a contradiction in terms.
As for imposition by light pollution that’s just an ordinary violation of tort of the commons resolvable in a court of conflict between regions.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 12:58:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225765763962765317
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225764243703828482
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225764243703828482
???
kind of an open ended question isn’t it?
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 02:28:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225607243313401860
Reply addressees: @ocse01
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225607038803120128
IN REPLY TO:
@ocse01
@curtdoolittle what are your thoughts on obligations/responsibilities to community/country/people?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225607038803120128
Nor may any deprive another of the ars that are the means to self determination.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 02:02:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225600690082459648
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225597701720551424
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Rights. Rights to self-determination. Rights to bear arms to preserve that right. None may deprive another of the right to self determination, without surrendering that right to self determination him or herself. https://twitter.com/Nationalist7346/status/1225590020750430208
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225597701720551424
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
Rights. Rights to self-determination. Rights to bear arms to preserve that right. None may deprive another of the right to self determination, without surrendering that right to self determination him or herself. https://t.co/Wbq2gLCYVS
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225597701720551424
Rights. Rights to self-determination. Rights to bear arms to preserve that right. None may deprive another of the right to self determination, without surrendering that right to self determination him or herself. https://twitter.com/Nationalist7346/status/1225590020750430208
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 01:50:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225597701720551424
https://twitter.com/Nationalist7346/status/1225590020750430208
We have a roll out plan. We have to assume will get suppressed rather quickly. So it’s important to roll out ideas before we roll out activism.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 00:52:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225583151474528257
Reply addressees: @RickyBobby_USA @JohnMarkSays @AutisticArchiv1 @drmiller1960
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225582789212409863
IN REPLY TO:
@RickyBobby_USA
@JohnMarkSays @AutisticArchiv1 @curtdoolittle @drmiller1960 Are there steps to take prior to separation other than the presentation/conveyance of P? Conveyance of #Reciprocity or is that basically P?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225582789212409863
I found that the number of responses (participants) wasn’t worth the time to run them, and that in general people aren’t that good at that level of work. It’s better to just get them to grasp the arguments
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 00:45:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225581394270859265
Reply addressees: @eruditenights
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225578922336825345
IN REPLY TO:
@eruditenights
If you’re going to pursue the idea again
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225578922336825345
Well done.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 00:33:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225578290674577410
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225533612927393792
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225533612927393792
So is the alt right empirically over?
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-06 21:30:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225532310545666050
There are about a dozen at some stage of ‘graduates’ and about 300 actively participating and something one the order of 5000 involved, and the number of people we reach varies from thousands to a million. John knows the reach, Bill knows the directly involved.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-06 20:39:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225519380517265409
Reply addressees: @RickyBobby_USA @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225506596912074753
IN REPLY TO:
@RickyBobby_USA
@curtdoolittle @JohnMarkSays I haven’t been following for that long. Have you duplicated yourselves?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225506596912074753