Source: Twitter X

  • ok. thinking

    ok. thinking.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 04:18:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918158031294288024

    Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918157220514050429


    IN REPLY TO:

    @LukeWeinhagen

    “So just as I am separating my personal website from the institute, in order to give the institute breathing room – distance from my early research work”

    Really dislike this outcome.

    I am against any “distancing”.

    Move early work to an archive like
    archive(.)naturallawinstitute(.)com, sure, to make the main site more navigable and make the search feature there more specifically functional to institute business.

    But hiding from early work, i.e. “distancing”, is not at all what I was hoping to see.

    I already believe too much has been removed from public access. I don’t want any of the harsh and ugly process of discovery hidden. I was hoping moving earlier materials to an archive branch of the site would allow for even more of the early efforts to be restored for public access.

    It’s unfortunate that this has become the motivation.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918157220514050429

  • Of course. I try to stay current with the field. And additionally I can explain

    Of course. I try to stay current with the field. And additionally I can explain the neuroscience, and can delve into sex differences as well as cognitive differences as (g) increases


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 03:59:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918153410899263523

    Reply addressees: @Hitchslap1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918128017345585659


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Hitchslap1

    @curtdoolittle Thank you Curt. Very perspicacious reply. Have you read the results of the SMPY study as they relate to performance at the 99th percentile and above?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918128017345585659

  • RETURNING ANGLO NAVAL OPTIMISM AND CLASSICAL LIBERALISM TO GERMANIC CONTINENTAL

    RETURNING ANGLO NAVAL OPTIMISM AND CLASSICAL LIBERALISM TO GERMANIC CONTINENTAL CAUTION AND CONSERVATISM.

    Martin and I have been holding a long standing discussion between my anglo imperial optimism, and his continental national pessimism.
    Both of us hold these positions for…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 02:35:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918132156834169132

  • RETURNING ANGLO NAVAL OPTIMISM AND CLASSICAL LIBERALISM TO GERMANIC CONTINENTAL

    RETURNING ANGLO NAVAL OPTIMISM AND CLASSICAL LIBERALISM TO GERMANIC CONTINENTAL CAUTION AND CONSERVATISM.

    Martin and I have been holding a long standing discussion between my anglo imperial optimism, and his continental national pessimism.
    Both of us hold these positions for rational reasons. But our decidability appears to be the result of different ambitions.
    I am attempting to create a science that describes an optimum frictionless human order such that we can measure the costs of pragmatic deviation from it by acknowledging those costs are paid for our national preferences.
    In doing so I hope to end the second abrahamic feminine destruction of the west, and our tolerance internal competition that is against the interests of our people.
    Martin’s objective is narrower and clearer, which is to restore a less optimistic, less tolerant, more national, provincial, and familial order that people would actually prefer LIVING in, and which was insulated from the evils that the permissiveness of anglo liberalism has enabled by it’s creation of the postwar international system. Which itself was subject to capture by the feminine political and abrahamic global tribalism, must as the aristocracy was destroyed by liberalism instead of augmented by it.
    Those of you who know my work recognize that I advocate expansion of government by glasses but not conquest of government by classes. As such rule of law, monarchy, republic, and maximum political participation by those demonstrating responsibility and competency to bear the burden of choice.
    Martin’s final success in helping me understand his position was to convince me that the deviation from germanic civilization by the anglosphere after 1830 converted the moral content of the west to an economic content and system of decidability putting us in line withthe long history of the crimes of that other minority who abandoned ethics for income in the form of rent seeking.
    I should note that I am sometimes an immovable rock because my epistemic standards is so far above normal that it exasperates others. And I should note that Dr Brad Werrell has tried for years to help me understand this – with his usual patience like water on a rock.
    But while I will not change my scientific mission going forward I will attempt to understand that the restoration of the germanic civilization’s permisos is a necessary consequence of the exhaustion of the capacity of consumerism to organize and incentivize human behavior.
    And while it is this latter reaction that helped me understand how to interpret what I consider the backward looking regressivism of Martin and Brad, and their failure to recognize we had dragged mankind out of poverty with that postwar anglo strategy – the fact of the matter is that this period is over and as such it’s time to reunite anglo and germanic civilization because the anglo empire is as impossible as any other now that we have equilibrated science, technology, and economics worldwide erasing the 600 year advantage of the anglosphere that enabled it’s conquest and reformation of the world.
    We saved man from agrarian poverty.
    We are still the most moral people on earth.
    Even if we are the most foolishly optimistic in the face of the pervasive nature of man.
    Affections
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 02:35:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918132156557344768

  • LEAVING THE RIGHT FOR THE MAINSTREAM? As I gain a deeper understanding of my own

    LEAVING THE RIGHT FOR THE MAINSTREAM?
    As I gain a deeper understanding of my own work in relation to the understanding of others, and review my own history as a conservative libertarian (classical liberal in the Jeffersonian mould), I come to understand that the extraordinary… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1900975315100594550


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 02:18:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918128017991450634

  • That’s the upper end of midwit range. Benefits continue to accrue through the 14

    That’s the upper end of midwit range. Benefits continue to accrue through the 140s, though specialization tends to increase, and therefore normative divergence, especially up to 160 – which is about the max testable.

    There are declining economic returns in most cases, which is…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 01:58:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918122787715325952

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918111598960656753


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Hitchslap1

    Many people believe the benefits of IQ have an upper limit. That above 120 IQ you get diminishing returns.

    Do you agree?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918111598960656753

  • RT @DRolandAnderson: @KirkegaardEmil “Stereotypes are one of our most reliable s

    RT @DRolandAnderson: @KirkegaardEmil “Stereotypes are one of our most reliable sources of truth, because they survive tests of falsificatio…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 01:11:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918111182810169351

  • Yes

    Yes.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 00:08:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918095275006279866

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918091190114640030


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AutistocratMS

    @curtdoolittle I’ve agreed with this, except just a few days ago, I started considering the possibility that AI might develop self-interest without anyone’s intent simply by being being trained on human data which do express our self-interest.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918091190114640030

  • RT @razibkhan: if the sexes were reversed we’d never hear the end of this

    RT @razibkhan: if the sexes were reversed we’d never hear the end of this


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 23:48:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918090190406717461

  • RT @JohnHolbein1: Studying economics and business in college makes students beco

    RT @JohnHolbein1: Studying economics and business in college makes students become much more conservative. https://t.co/niCLriciOc


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 23:47:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918089899955331290