ok. thinking

Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 04:18:06 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918158031294288024

Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918157220514050429

IN REPLY TO:

@LukeWeinhagen

“So just as I am separating my personal website from the institute, in order to give the institute breathing room – distance from my early research work”

Really dislike this outcome.

I am against any “distancing”.

Move early work to an archive like
archive(.)naturallawinstitute(.)com, sure, to make the main site more navigable and make the search feature there more specifically functional to institute business.

But hiding from early work, i.e. “distancing”, is not at all what I was hoping to see.

I already believe too much has been removed from public access. I don’t want any of the harsh and ugly process of discovery hidden. I was hoping moving earlier materials to an archive branch of the site would allow for even more of the early efforts to be restored for public access.

It’s unfortunate that this has become the motivation.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918157220514050429