@PatrickReports STop caring, double down, massively increase frequency.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 21:42:29 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696603112787359
Source: Original Site Post
-
@kaosktrl Are you trying to hit on me. ;). (humor)
@kaosktrl Are you trying to hit on me. ;). (humor)
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 21:16:22 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696500418261118
-
@RavenMacLean @Teamsaveamerica Well, the fact that you’re a cancer carrier and w
@RavenMacLean@Teamsaveamerica Well, the fact that you’re a cancer carrier and willfully ignorant of it doesn’t mean you aren’t a cancer carrier.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 21:15:40 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696497668662440
-
@RavenMacLean @Teamsaveamerica Yes you did. You equated someone’s using GSRRM to
Yes you did. You equated someone’s using GSRRM to avoid the truth, to imiate the left, to undermine, doxx, and cancel (a crime) as with accusing someone of doing so (an accusation).
That’s either (a) lying by failure of due diligence, (b) lying by incompetence, or (c) lying by intent.
You don’t have to intend to lie. You have to produce a lie by failing to ensure you’re speaking the truth. Under law, intent has no meaning. You either commit a crime or you don’t. You committed a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 21:14:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696494568964494
-
@RavenMacLean @Teamsaveamerica You equated accusing someone of GSRRM to avoid th
@RavenMacLean@Teamsaveamerica You equated accusing someone of GSRRM to avoid the truth, to imiate the left, to undermine, doxx, and cancel as the same as the action.
That’s either (a) lying by failure of due diligence or (b)lying by intent.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 21:12:35 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696485522320740
-
@WesternChauvinist1 It’s called israel. we paid for it. we still pay for it. Go
@WesternChauvinist1 It’s called israel. we paid for it. we still pay for it. Go there.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 21:10:12 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696476167450739
-
“Because life isn’t a network sitcom written by Jews, and that’s the only place
— “Because life isn’t a network sitcom written by Jews, and that’s the only place multiracial societies work.” — @WesternChauvinist1
Flawless! 😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 21:09:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696473005531668
-
@Angry_Norman @RadioFreeNorthwest — “They’re peasants who dream of being patric
@Angry_Norman@RadioFreeNorthwest — “They’re peasants who dream of being patricians.” —
They’re COGFEMS (cognitively female) who dream of being male (rational and capable)
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 20:33:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696332420232446
-
@RavenMacLean @Teamsaveamerica That’s clearly false. I’m accusing you, and him,
@RavenMacLean@Teamsaveamerica That’s clearly false. I’m accusing you, and him, of lying, and GSSRM as a strategy. IT’s not false to or GSRRM to claim that a person using a method of lying is shaming. It’s called CRIME. I’m not using a moral claim. I’m using a CRIMINAL claim. That GSRRM, pilpul, critique, abrahamiism, and the female method of warfare is CRIMINAL – a violation of reciprocity. A Crime against the commons of information, norm, tradition, institution, that we depend upon for organizing under sovereignty and reciprocity.
Now I realize that you don’t comprehend the difference and so what to me is rather obviously your criminality, is a matter of a failure of due diligence, because you’re just ignorant, and indoctrinated into ignorance.
But the fact is the fact: AF-Groypers are fking cancerous criminals no better than the enemy, and as such are equally an enemy.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 20:31:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696325168650090
-
WE CANNOT ASSUME IT’S POSSIBLE TO TEACH SCIENTIFIC LAW — “We cannot assume that
WE CANNOT ASSUME IT’S POSSIBLE TO TEACH SCIENTIFIC LAW
— “We cannot assume that the understanding of P, and its teachability will percolate downwards, but that need not be the case for the benefits of the reforms to be detected and pursued across the distribution. It appears that in each case the discovery of the utility of P was made by upper outliers, and primarily teachable to those outliers. But the benefits it produces a means to secure are not constrained to those outliers.” – contrafabian @ContraFabian
Agreed. Science -> Law -> Constittuion -> Policies -> “The Cure”
The people only need to understand the policies and the cure. Some of them may need to understand ‘it’s just the science, and that’s all’. But some of them can’t even undrestand that. So our job is to sell the policy and the science only when necessary or possible.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 20:16:26 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696264712675155