Source: Original Site Post

  • @BrianCN (a) there was a black sea deluge around 5600BC. (b) there was a persian

    @BrianCN (a) there was a black sea deluge around 5600BC. (b) there was a persian gulf deluge around 12,000-10,000BC. Both caused major migrations. Hence the IE expansion into the steppe, and the north migration of the language isolate mesopotamians.

    No more lies. You learned to lie. You were indoctrinated into lying. You are a liar. You can’t help yourself. No More Lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-29 01:22:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107703130159351366

  • @BrianCN Almost no genetic remnant – none. And the europeans that did, were the

    @BrianCN Almost no genetic remnant – none. And the europeans that did, were the southernmost indo-europeans, that migrated counter clockwise around the black sea, through the balkans, greece, and into anatolia. The major differences between the european and south eurasian races is about one standard deviation in IQ – a lot.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-29 01:10:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107703083743859832

  • @Afterrthought ( Thanks. You made my day. 😉 )

    @Afterrthought ( Thanks. You made my day. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 20:55:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107702080635574004

  • @BrianCN Wrong. The original flood myth is pre organized religion. It has at lea

    @BrianCN Wrong. The original flood myth is pre organized religion. It has at least two origins: the first being the destruction of the first human settlements in the flooding of the pesian gulf, which is why there is a disconnect between the indic biased languages of the south and the semitic languages of the north.

    The second reinforcing flood myth is the black sea deluge. We originally thought that the black sea deluge was the origin of the myth. But the original mythos as far as we can ascertain describes the common circular reed boats used by marsh Arabs in the Tigris-Euphrates, and the now flooded region of rivers prior to the flooding of the persian gulf.

    The flooding of northern Europe (doggerland) appears to not have produced a mythos. We do not have the ability to determine if the flooding of the Caspian region produced any other mythos. But this set of at least three macro floods displacing humans from fresh water, explains the near universalism of the myth prior to the development of organized religions.

    You will eventually have to come to terms that the middle east is a low-iq region of an admixture of afro-Asiatic and south Eurasian peoples, who developed mythologizing instead of history or empiricism or contract law as a formal means of norm production. In other words, they invented lying. And this is why the Abrahamic religions rely on the Abrahamic method of lying we technically call ‘fictionalisms’ which make use of sophistry and supernaturalism, to impose authority over the minds of low IQ peoples.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 19:21:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107701712426412312

  • RE: “… IT”S JUST SWEAT (IN YOUR SHORTS) RIGHT?” It’s just sweat. (a) Because o

    RE: “… IT”S JUST SWEAT (IN YOUR SHORTS) RIGHT?”

    It’s just sweat. (a) Because of thyroid cancer, I have no thyroid, plus severe allergies require I take a handful of allergy medications. This combination makes it difficult to regulate body temperature in the heat. (b) I’d gained 15 pounds from covid isolation already (c) I was drinking too much water to compensate for the heat (d) the ‘fancy expensive’ shorts and athletic underwear were collecting the volumes of sweat, and as you can see the shirt is soaked too.

    And it’s rather obvious in all the videos that I’m happy and confident, and fking around with everyone.

    My primary concern was to not create another C-ville and as we saw with Jan6th, I was right not to.

    Ghandi’s strategy and seeking to restore the constitution and the necessity of the second amendment to maintain that constitution is the only viable option that does not fall victim to the left’s strategy of painting the right as evil fascist totalitarians bent on violence and oppression, by ‘BAITING US INTO HAZARD’.

    The problem is you idiots always take the bait. We showed how not to take the bait. You were stupid, didn’t understand, and copying the enemy, and doing the enemy’s work for them, cancelled us.

    The enemy plays you like a dumb-fuck fiddle, and you always fall for it.
    We showed how victory was possible by disempowering the enemy.

    You were too stupid to get it. You turned on us. And so we gave up on you.

    Enemies must be defeated on their terms not yours.

    You deserve what you get because of your stupidity, ignorance, arrogance, and infatilisim.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 19:13:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107701678141990454

  • RELIGION AND CIVILIZATION LEADING TO THE NATURAL RELIGION OF MAN ME did not deve

    RELIGION AND CIVILIZATION LEADING TO THE NATURAL RELIGION OF MAN

    ME did not develop trifunctionalism because despite the center of world trade, the supply of a sequence of ‘hill people, desert people, then steppe people’ caused rotation of conqueres of concentrated capital production along the rivers preventing trust formation.

    There are only three means of human coercion (seduction, exchange, force) -> three sets of institutions (religion, contract law, state) -> the sequence of institutions determines the hierarchy of influence.

    ME sequence was Religion -> State -> Common Law (Contract). ie: all civilizational differences are caused by degree of heterogeneity, number of competitors, means of agrarian age production, and geography.

    So ME heterogeneity (tribalism), serial conquest, river production, and religion (first generation institution) generates demand for authoritarian religion and authoritarian state, instead of common law (Indo-european) or bureaucratic state (china).

    So despite ME invention of all mechanisms of trade ( writing, recording, accounting, weights/measures) other than Greeks and their money. And despite being center of world trade, conflict maintained demand for low trust abstract authority rather than high trust empirical law.

    As we see in China, in India, and in the ME, the rate of evolutionary computation is determined by the degree of empiricism FIRST, the degree of trade second, and the homogeneity of the population third. Ergo: Which civ evolves fastest is more influential than which was first.

    If I am correct, each civilization revolts against empiricism, because it produces inequality despite raising overall prosperity(envy), then ME should only require another generation (max three) if present rates of development continue, presuming no new wave of fundamentalism.

    This is evident in the younger generation. Interestingly the west has become degenerate b/c of tolerance, the russians and chinese are preventing this and I assum ME will do so as well.

    So we see in europe, that advanced analog computing technology had evolved by 200bc, but christian religion destroyed aristocracy, replacing cooperating families of empirical-entreprenurial-military with supernatural-authoritarian-priesthood.

    From this understanding we learn (a) our cultural differences are accidents of geography (b) rule of law (empirical law of tort) matters more than the form of government or the religion (c) this rule of law is just ‘applied evolutionary science’. (d) all people can apply science.

    And lastly (e) the result of the applied science, of the rule of empirical law of tort, produces the greatest trust, and the greatest trust and surplus produces greatest possibility of producing commons, and commons reduce costs of living and need for for the poor and the middle – offsetting the inequality of income through commons production that is a radical discount not achievable through indivicual or familial income.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 19:01:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107701632779075773

  • @psychosis67 You’re just piling on. I’m avoiding unnecessary detail that simply

    @psychosis67 You’re just piling on. I’m avoiding unnecessary detail that simply leads to opportunities for deception.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 13:09:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107700247956975044

  • @Lauramcoz No. The scientific method consists of producing truthful testimony. W

    @Lauramcoz No. The scientific method consists of producing truthful testimony. What youi’re saying is evil works. And sure. Evil works. … with consequences.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 13:06:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107700234745876568

  • @QlinuxQQQ Again, you just don’t understand what I wrote. Move along

    @QlinuxQQQ Again, you just don’t understand what I wrote. Move along.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 13:04:41 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107700229363257631