Boost of @WesternChauvinist1 No, brown shirts were created because communists and Antifa were assassinating and beating Nationalists in the streets of weimar Germany. The National Socialists faced the same tyranny we do today, and they organized against it and won their country back for a brief time.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-07 04:33:38 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107754875467711195
DEFINING HOW THE UNIVERSE USES COMPUTATION VS CALCULATION
Richard: Q: — “Curt: So when matter is able to form a stable relationship that persists that is a computation rather than a calculation? I was under the (false?) impression that matter can only calculate and that life can only compute. Life, memory, consciousness, language are more and more precise levels of computation?” —
This is one of my failings of inconsistency. techically only conscious life can calculate (Transform inputs into outputs by rules). The physical universe can compute by trial and error. We don’t have a word for the space between compute and calculate. So the best thing to say is that it takes life to calculate (as you said), and the universe otherwise can only compute.
Or we can take it farther that only life can compute, only conscous life can calculate. but then we have to find some way of talking about the universe’s physical functions (which are closer to addition subtraction) and would rightly be categorized as arithmetic.
We will always be stuck in soem of these battles becasue we want to avoid neologisms, and instead just improve the precision of terms.
And so I try to pick the term that does the best job, and ‘compute’ is the most universal term at all scales, while calculate implies deduction and induction and therefore requries sentience (consciousness really).
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 23:05:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107753552240020305
WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE ONLY REQUIRE THREE DIMENSIONS OF MEASUREMENT(DESCRIPTION) AND ONE DIMENSION OF CHANGE (TIME)?
“Q: Curt: What’s so special about triangles!”
The simple answer is that no external information is needed in order to calculate a plane just as no external information is necessary to calculate a sphere.
Q: “What’s an example of something that would require external information in order to calculate it?”
1) no matter what you do with three points triangle it will always and only create a triangle. (two opposing forces – two points – can create a stable state – the third point.
2) no matter what you do to two points they will only create a line. two opposing forces can create a stable relationship.
3) no matter what you do to a point: it will only create a point. A stable state will remain stable unless subject to an opposite charge (force)
4) in order to create any other geometry you must apply some rule where the information must be stored externally to the arbitrary relation of the points.
5) in other words, how can the universe know how to create a square, or a cube? it can’t.
6) This is why the universe has only three dimensions, and can only have three dimensions.
This is why we see all the universe evolve from one force -pressure- creating two opposing forces (negative and positive charge) we call polarity.
This polarity (line) can only survive (maintain state) if it has sufficient energy not to collapse back into the background state – because the background state cannot produce (concentrate) enough negative or positive energy to cancel it out.
If this object can accumulate enough force to create a stable state (survive) then we now have three points, the negative charge x, the positive charge y, and the sum of the charges z that produces a surface area (total charge) greater than the charges of x and y and such cannot dissipate.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 21:14:38 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107753116668331825
@barramerkurprotonmailcom@RadioFreeNorthwest (And he’s one of the tiny number of adults in the room.)
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 20:14:35 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107752880559743235
@barramerkurprotonmailcom@RadioFreeNorthwest (True)
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 20:14:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107752878679646810
@WesternChauvinist1 He’s a problem to be removed from the discourse because he’s an agent of the enemy and nothing more.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 20:13:19 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107752875592367077
@Tayai Um. I think they can form the demonstration wing, but they lack the IQ points and prestentation quality to produce a solution to the problems of the age.
One does not make the public afraid of you. One makes the eliets afraid of the fact that the public admires you. And when I say the public I don’t mean the right wing.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 20:12:36 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107752872719295918
RE: TRUCKERS IN THE STATES?
Yes. Truckers + Linemen and its over.
Just because you bring it up: The strategic ‘crippling’ of the federal government is route 95 from south of Richmond va to the maryland border. I’d published a few examples of how to do it, resulting in the FBI in my kitchen.
While we think of DC as key, most of the critical infrastructure a revolution movement would be interested in is in and around Richmond. That includes certain ‘axis of evil’ data centers, telecom centers, and the federal reserve branch, and is within reach of the majority of media and ngo’s that are operating the postwar project to destroy our instituions, culture, and genetics.
Hence my strategic interest in Richmond.
There are three civil-war weak points in the US.
1. DC-Richmond
2. Denver
3. The State of Texas as a whole.
The secessionist weak points in the are
1. the northwest (nw ports)
2. the center from texas to alberta (gulf ports)
But, the strategic weakness of gulf ports is equal to the south china sea.
No I don’t do details, but I assume those who know me understand that winning a civil war is not difficult. The question is doing it by demonizing the federal government, the globalists, the financial, media, and academic sectors. (Not that their recent over-reach hasn’t caused a backlash already) And not turning the population against any such movement, but offering the population a solution to the problems unleashed by the prosperity of modernity.
The right fucks up that last point at every opportunity. IT’s easy not to fuck it up. But the right fucks it up every single time at every single opportunity. And without a leader to stop the right from fucking it up every single time at every single opportunity, I don’t see any chance of victory. Because the right is presently (and likely always) in its present state of incompetence, a greater threat to the center majority than the left and the status quo.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 15:28:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107751755233879722
@Dessi@Afterrthought@ramzpaul@kingofallnads @CounterCurrents
Just because you bring it up: The strategic ‘crippling’ of the federal government is route 95 from south of Richmond va to the maryland border. I’d published a few examples of how to do it, resulting in the FBI in my kitchen.
While we think of DC as key, most of the critical infrastructure a revolution movement would be interested in is in and around Richmond. That includes certain ‘axis of evil’ data centers, telecom centers, and the federal reserve branch, and is within reach of the majority of media and ngo’s that are operating the postwar project to destroy our instituions, culture, and genetics.
Hence my strategic interest in Richmond.
There are three civil-war weak points in the US.
1. DC-Richmond
2. Denver
3. The State of Texas as a whole.
The secessionist weak points in the are
1. the northwest (nw ports)
2. the center from texas to alberta (gulf ports)
But, the strategic weakness of gulf ports is equal to the south china sea.
No I don’t do details, but I assume those who know me understand that winning a civil war is not difficult. The question is doing it by demonizing the federal government, the globalists, the financial, media, and academic sectors. (Not that their recent over-reach hasn’t caused a backlash already) And not turning the population against any such movement, but offering the population a solution to the problems unleashed by the prosperity of modernity.
The right fucks up that last point at every opportunity. IT’s easy not to fuck it up. But the right fucks it up every single time at every single opportunity. And without a leader to stop the right from fucking it up every single time at every single opportunity, I don’t see any chance of victory. Because the right is presently (and likely always) in its present state of incompetence, a greater threat to the center majority than the left and the status quo.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 15:27:32 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107751751827668285
THE EVOLUTIONARY ORIGIN OF FACTIONS
Female->Children+Resources (Herd) Demand
… Left = Drive for Hyperconsumption (dysgenics)
… … Left of Center = Drive for Consensus (utility) Via-Positiva
… … Right of Center = Decide Conflicts (truth) Via-Negativa
… Right = Drive for Hypercapitalzation (eugenics)
Male->Peers+Territory (Pack) Demand
Once you see it as sense, perception, calculation it make sense.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-06 14:28:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107751521021919561