Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Boost of @impenitent @curtd @Weber_Kettle Warning: Effort Poast incoming That is

    Boost of @impenitent@curtd@Weber_Kettle

    Warning: Effort Poast incoming

    That isn’t fatalism, it is an attempt to recognize the problem.
    So long as the Enemy holds all the high points of culture and mass media they pick “our” leaders and always raise the feckless, incompetent or, more often, the compromised.

    Yet that isn’t the root of the problem. The Internet could route around the media now and raise a leader. Like Trump. The problem is Conservatism. If one were looking for the perfect political philosophy to oppose you, one to ensure you never faced a real threat, you couldn’t design something better. It explicitly rejects making concrete policy proposals, it only attempts to “stand athwart History, yelling STOP!”

    Having no policy preference of its own means it can’t attempt to undo any victory of the Left. So it is left holding and “conserving” them, at best making minor tweaks to make them less unstable and suicidal, leaving the Left to move on to the next battle. We all saw how fast National Review went from opposition to firing people for insufficient enthusiasm for marriage redefinition.

    Conservatism agrees society “must change” and simply reverting Leftism wholesale would just be “turning the clock back” so it must accept each new innovation by the Left and try to “make it work.” And it is right that we just can’t “go back” because tech has changed the reality on the ground too much. The 1950s (or whatever your preferred “golden age” is, doesn’t matter) with cheap, rapid air travel and the Internet would not be viable.

    What do we want?

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 16:14:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107763440747845548

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107754942661573225

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    @Weber_Kettle fatalism is a demonstration of either ignorance, incompetence, or cowardice. There is a right (population)., There just aren’t enough people in that population that will show up and take the risk necessary to foce the dialog that will create the change.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107754942661573225

  • Boost of @AngeloJohnGage Creationists (who are a dying minority of religious fol

    Boost of @AngeloJohnGage Creationists (who are a dying minority of religious folks) refuse to realize their “holy books” are not meant to be taken literally; that goat-herding, sand-dwellers 2000 years ago, literally got everything wrong, and we can objectively verify those things to be wrong with several fields of science, so much so, that the majority of Christian scientists accept evolution: one because it is a fact, and two, because it has literally nothing to do with the existence of God, or how life began on Earth (that is abiogenesis)—evolution is simply how life evolves. But because Creationists take their “holy books” literally, they cannot accept a single fact, and must deny everything, in the face of proof, otherwise they think that God doesn’t exist, or the Bible is false, when it is obvious that the Bible, and other religious texts, are manmade and have no bearing on whether God, or any gods, exist. One can easily be religious and accept the FACT of evolution, by understanding that if God exists, he created self-replicating life that evolved into everything he wanted it to, including humans.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 16:13:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107763466529715495

  • @Communism_Kills (Just want to add the tidbit that a small portion of the popula

    @Communism_Kills (Just want to add the tidbit that a small portion of the population has no inner voice. a small portion has no inner vision (visualization), and a small portion lack both. Conversely a small portion of the population has the opposite experience, hearing voices and hallucinating people and things. So as in all things humans vary across the visual, auditory, and sensory spectrum)

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 14:57:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107762957745375793

  • @voxday There is zero chance you’re smarter than I am. Zero chance you’ve done t

    @voxday There is zero chance you’re smarter than I am. Zero chance you’ve done the math. And an absolute certainty you’re quoting a Yale professor of theology who also claimed he’d done the math. And both of you proving that the function of Abrahamism is to teach adherence to lie so that they can engage in social construction of falsehoods, in order to collectively obtain false confidence is by false pretense of sexual, social, political, economic, military, status, explaining their evasion (or failure) of evolutionary adaptation, precisely because they lack that status by demonstrable means other than social construction of falsehoods.

    The female means of lying by undermining truth and social construction of falsehoods: Judaism > Christianity > Islam … Marxism > Neo-Marxism > Postmodernism > PC-Woke.

    Same tactics (female undermining of truth) same strategy (social construction of a falsehood that attempts to deny evolutionary superiority) and same result (Dark Age of Ignorance and Superstition).

    That’s the truth of why you lie, the history of why you lie, and the technique by which you lie, and the evolutionary origin of how and why you lie, in the female means of anti-social behavior, economic, political, cultural, civilizational warfare, because the female is weaker, and must seduce with false promises (lie) and undermine with disinformation (lie) by fomenting insurrection (war) because of her (your) weakness.

    Period. End of Story. So, Accusation Submitted. Argument Presented. Judgment Presented. Conviction Issued. The only question is the sentencing and the punishment for your crimes against humanity.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 14:45:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107762909718064410

  • @asomd2021 @voxday ACCUSATON: LIAR All early theories are imprecise and evolve t

    @asomd2021@voxday

    ACCUSATON: LIAR
    All early theories are imprecise and evolve to increasingly precise. Haeckel was working in right along and after Darwin, and did the best he could to communicate the idea of developmental similarity with the resources available. So he created those he could, borrowed some from others, duplicated those he couldn’t tell the difference, removed egg sacs, chose different stages of development, oritented, and scaled the different drawings, to illustrate the develomental similarity for the ordinary reader – not other biologists.

    In the drawing I’ve attached here, the photos are accurate.

    VERDICT:
    There is a difference in precision but his early attempt to illustrate the developmental similarity and sequence stands.

    Like I said. Abrahamic religion teaches you to lie. And you;re happy to lie. And the liars attempted to claim errors in precision are equal to falsity. As if a cartoon or a parable cannot be used to tell a fundamentl truth despite their extraordinary imprecision – if you catch my meaning – by appeal to the supernatural.

    Original Drawings vs Photos attached.

    Commonly Cited Paper:
    home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/articles/Haeckel–fra

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 14:27:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107762839968759052

  • @voxday A painful truth. If there is a devil we know his name: Abraham

    @voxday A painful truth. If there is a devil we know his name: Abraham.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 05:33:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107760742308253663

  • Boost of @curtd @voxday A painful truth. If there is a devil we know his name: A

    Boost of @curtd@voxday A painful truth. If there is a devil we know his name: Abraham.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 05:33:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107760744363252054

  • @voxday VOX: You aren’t intellectually capable of making that statement, and for

    @voxday VOX: You aren’t intellectually capable of making that statement, and for those of us who are, it’s one of the dumbest possible statements one could make.

    So quite the contrary, evolution is mathematically deterministic because the first principle of the universe is equivalent to the term ‘evolve’.

    In fact, the interesting thing about life on earth is that it occurred so quickly in the history of the universe, since it takes so much time to evolve the elements necessary, by generations of stars’ life cycles. And extinction events caused rapid evolution by creating punctuated equilibriums. One of which is ‘humans’ over the past three million years.

    No more of your lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 05:33:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107760740508233670

  • Boost of @curtd @voxday VOX: You aren’t intellectually capable of making that st

    Boost of @curtd@voxday VOX: You aren’t intellectually capable of making that statement, and for those of us who are, it’s one of the dumbest possible statements one could make.

    So quite the contrary, evolution is mathematically deterministic because the first principle of the universe is equivalent to the term ‘evolve’.

    In fact, the interesting thing about life on earth is that it occurred so quickly in the history of the universe, since it takes so much time to evolve the elements necessary, by generations of stars’ life cycles. And extinction events caused rapid evolution by creating punctuated equilibriums. One of which is ‘humans’ over the past three million years.

    No more of your lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 05:33:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107760744216345710

  • @Nationalist7346 SEPARATION. AND IT ISN”T HARD

    @Nationalist7346 SEPARATION. AND IT ISN”T HARD.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 05:28:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107760720042572799