Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @Dubious_pug @VII @voxday Re: “~curt’s not addressing the mathematical argument”

    @Dubious_pug@VII@voxday

    Re: “~curt’s not addressing the mathematical argument”

    I addressed it. You just didn’t understand it. It’s really simple: in the human line, vox used Change (Mutation) rate vs Survival (Fixation) Rate. I’m not sure why I need to do your work for you instead of simply pointing out the rather obviuos error of using the wrong variable. Of course vox is wrong. He’s made an amateur’s error.

    And to cut the rest of you off at the knees, I’ve been expanding the ‘error’ (motivated reasoning: in other words, a lie by failure of due diligence) to explain the variables and mathematical constraints on evolutionary processes themselves.

    This is beyond you but then, what I”m illustrating is that the concepts are beyond the entire vox-moron clique – because – by natural selection – anyone stupid (evolutionarily unfit) enough to fall for vox’s ‘pseudomath’ and moron-service argument, would of course, follow someone who supplied justification for motivated reasoning for like minded morons.

    Note how no one has even once, demonstrated even the vaguest understanding of mathematics, genetics, or logic.

    Which is expected really.
    Which is the whole point of this little side project.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 16:52:19 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769072174623600

  • “TLDR” — BlackRabbi1488 @Black_Rabbi Here. I’ll correct that answer for you. TD

    — “TLDR” — BlackRabbi1488 @Black_Rabbi

    Here. I’ll correct that answer for you.

    TDTR: Too Dumb To Read

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 16:40:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769023904626368

  • “Curt, if I could weigh in here: you’re arguing like a colossal faggot.” — Krag

    — “Curt, if I could weigh in here: you’re arguing like a colossal faggot.” — Krageley @Kragely

    It’s called “Bullying the gamma morons in the Short Bus.” And yes. I’m guilty for bullying the gamma morons in the bright yellow short bus, who are returning from the Vox Day School For Gamma Morons.

    Now, we only need to distinguish between bullying and ostracizing. And the necessity of ostracizing defectives from the gene pool.

    Someone has to clean up after you. I’m just doing my civic duty.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 13:46:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107768342680411893

  • CANCELLED BY VOX DAY 😉 I’ve succeeded in offending Vox Day and his superstitiou

    CANCELLED BY VOX DAY 😉

    I’ve succeeded in offending Vox Day and his superstitious, sophomoric infantile morons – so I’ve been blocked. 😉

    If they remain silent then maybe there is a god … lol

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 13:39:26 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107768313723219399

  • @Tuplis @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday Well, if you speak in a langua

    @Tuplis@RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday Well, if you speak in a language another doesn’t understand it’s obvous that it would be incomprehensimble. BUt we can also speak in concepts another doesn’t understand – meaning it’s still incomprehensible. What is comprehensible depends on your knowledge and intelligence. You don’t have enough.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 12:24:11 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107768017830767765

  • @jorville Look at you. On a platform for words. lol Here let’s try it your way:

    @jorville Look at you. On a platform for words. lol

    Here let’s try it your way: “Look at me! Lying and Denying, to protect my faith in magic men in the sky!”

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 12:20:43 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107768004166946589

  • @LegionnaireBear @Black_Rabbi @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday (a) JFG

    @LegionnaireBear@Black_Rabbi@RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday (a) JFG did the math and explained the ‘error’ vox was making.
    But it was unnecessary since the error is obvious. JFG was being gracious. I’m not. I’m not claiming it’s an error but a lie by a failure of due diligence because of motivated reasoning.

    (b) I explained the reason one makes such errors and engages in motivated reasoning – with emphasis on the Abrahamic method of deception and social construction.

    (c) While again the error for calculating the human rate is simple, the cause of evolution itself, the description of the process, and the range of variables one must account for in claiming evolution itself is mathematically impossible is not simple. I listed a subset of the variables necessary in order to show that vox was not accounting for those variables.

    (d) I listed a subset of the criteria that any mathematical formalization would have to overcome – and vox failed to.

    (e) What I didn’t do yet, because I was hoping someone was vaguely intelligent enough to comprehend, is that the rate of evolutionary computation approaches infinity and varies by rate (size) of infinity (or ‘infinities’), meaning any claim evolution in historical timeline isn’t possible must demonstrate a difference in rates of infinities. Now,I know that’s over pretty much anyone’s head who believes in woo woo.

    You will run out of lies before I will run out of truth.

    That’s how this thing called continuous recursive production of testimony by falsification that we call ‘science’, incrementally erases ignorance, error, bias and deceit.

    Science is just law applied outside of tests of reciprocity.

    But then you don’t want the truth. You want to preserve a lie. Which is why you are a criminal, committing crimes against the commons of man.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 12:16:50 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107767988917515206

  • @Dubious_pug @voxday In an audience of infantile imbeclies we appeal to an exter

    @Dubious_pug@voxday In an audience of infantile imbeclies we appeal to an external jury of the competent adults.

    One does not convince the faithful that their social construction and perpetuation of deciets to which they’ve become addicted is false and immoral. One merely limits the damage they do, the externalization of their criminality, and the intergenerational transfer of their frauds.

    No criminal gives up his crime without enforcement.
    You are no different from any other criminals.
    It’s working. It’s just that the adults are impatient with you.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 07:37:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107766890085011002

  • @stevebuhk @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday You post this as if it has

    @stevebuhk@RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday You post this as if it has any merit.

    How about really simple stuff like dark ages of superstition and ignorance poverty, hard labor, starvation, and disease. Scientific ages of knowledge, prosperity, elimination of labor, elimination of starvation, and radical suppression of disease.

    It’s ok. I know. Junkies gotta Junkie. You junkies never give it up until you crash.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 06:24:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107766603554377421

  • @Snidely_Whiplash @Black_Rabbi @RenegadeScoutr @voxday Them make an argument fro

    @Snidely_Whiplash@Black_Rabbi@RenegadeScoutr@voxday

    Them make an argument from evidence:
    (a) what obvious falsehood did I state?
    (b) what syllogism did I fail to understand? (you lying f—k)

    Let me help you out a bit. So, I know you morons rely on supernaturalism, faith as equivalent to testimony, sophistry, and innumeracy, plus rather extraordinary ignorance of mathematics, in pilpul, critique, lying and denying.

    But I suppose that you grasp that a syllogism constiutes a subset of the logic of inference, and within that logic of inference, a reliance on sets, and the failings of sets withing the logic of inference:
    (a) all syllogistic arguments are predicated on assummed premises
    (b) all such arguments are justificationary
    (c) proofs are a statement of internal consistency only.
    (d) there is no closure in (verbal) logic regardless of internal consistency
    (e) closure requires operational logic – because operational logic tests causality.
    (f) and so on the contrary, all set logic then at best is falsificationary with ‘proof’ limited to trivialities.

    But of course, if you understood what you claim to, you would know that these are basic findings of the 20th century. And that’s just a quick sketch.

    ( And yes the audience of intelligent folk find these bitch-slaps to your infantile arrogance the subject of humor.)

    So. Man up.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 06:21:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107766591171141248